Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 01:36

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

I-Bank Training Programs Cut....

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Status: Burning mid-night oil....daily
Joined: 07 Nov 2008
Posts: 2400
Schools: Yale SOM 2011 Alum, Kellogg, Booth, Tuck
WE 1: IB - Restructuring & Distressed M&A
Followers: 73

Kudos [?]: 688 [1] , given: 548

Reviews Badge
I-Bank Training Programs Cut.... [#permalink] New post 01 Dec 2008, 08:57
1
This post received
KUDOS
This article was recently on WSJ. Apparently companies are cutting even training programs. Few years ago, many HR reps of financial services companies (while being interviewed by WSJ) promised that they won’t cut entry level training programs. Back in post 9-11 world, many i-banks cut these programs and as a result, suffered from talent shortage about 5 years later (when class of 2001 trainees would have made managing directors at this point)….

For this reason, they assured WSJ that training programs will survive regardless of other job cuts. Now that fin services are actually cutting training programs, should we all rethink our MBA applications if our ONLY goal for MBA was to work in fin service?

As Firms Retrench, Training Gets the Ax
NEW YORK -- Training programs for brokers are falling victim to the corporate budget ax, cutting off a source of new talent for financial firms.
Cost-cutting has been a prominent theme across many industries during the serious economic slump, and training often tops the list of areas to be pared back.
The shrinking pipeline for bringing in new brokers means more firms have to resort to poaching experienced brokers from rivals rather than developing their own staff.
UBS AG halted rookie hiring for the year in April, stopping at 250 trainees instead of the customary 800 trainees. Morgan Stanley, Citigroup Inc.'s Smith Barney and other firms also have cut back this year in hiring brokers-in-training, recruiters say.
Merrill Lynch & Co. revised its initiative in March, cutting training classes to 12 a year from 52 a year and adding salary tiers. But the firm didn't shrink the number of trainees going through the program. The new program is more cost-efficient, but a Merrill executive says that wasn't the reason for the change.
A UBS spokeswoman says, "We decided to focus our efforts this year on retention of our current adviser base and recruiting experienced financial advisers."
Morgan Stanley and Smith Barney declined to comment.
This restricted influx into the industry "is a severe problem," says Bob Ellis, a brokerage analyst at Celent, a financial-services consultant. "This is an aging force that needs to be replenished."
More than half of the advisers in the U.S. are more than 50 years old, and only 3% are under 30, according to a Cerrulli Associates report published this year. As those advisers begin to retire, fewer new ones will be entering the field.
"No one wants to build from the ground up -- they just want to buy brokers who already have books" of business, says Scott Smith, an analyst with Cerulli. "But, eventually, that pool is going to run dry,"
The number of advisers in the U.S. dropped to 245,831 from 256,569 between 2005 and year-end 2007, according to Cerulli.
"It's a shrinking business, and we are feeling the shrinkage," says Mickey Wasserman of recruiting firm Michael Wasserman & Associates. "There are fewer people managing more of the country's wealth."
Roughly one of 10 trainees becomes a profitable broker, and that takes anywhere from five to 10 years, analysts say. This makes training a new broker much more expensive than hiring an experienced broker.
When firms lure a veteran broker from another firm, they are paying for a record of success and an established book of client assets.
"It makes more sense in the short term, but firms need to be thinking about the long term," Mr. Smith says.
The market downturn also is causing more rookie brokers, who were able to get signed on in the past year, to then drop out of the industry.
The decline in brokers could result in investors with less than $1 million in investable assets being forced to resort to self-service investing online, saving the advisers for only the richest clients.
"This could force self-service on clients sooner," Mr. Ellis says. "Ten years from now, unless you have $5 million or more to invest, you'll be on your own."
One potential solution is for firms to contract outside training companies to come in and teach a few classes of new brokers when the firms have the money for training.
"This is a cyclical process. Firms can scale up when times are good and scale back when they're not," Mr. Ellis says. But, he adds, the firms that were most successful following the previous recession were those that continued to invest in training even when budgets were tight.
When the recession subsides, there will be an influx of client assets, and if the firms don't have rookie advisers they mightn't have people to take on those clients.
Another alternative, which some firms already are trying, is placing trainees on established teams as junior advisers. This gives them a chance to get client referrals from the veteran advisers as opposed to the traditional cold-calling approach.
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2008
Posts: 165
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: I-Bank Training Programs Cut.... [#permalink] New post 01 Dec 2008, 11:07
Thanks for the article. It seems like the actual training programs they are talking about refers to private wealth and not ibanking though (although those programs are probably cut as well)
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 797
Location: Texas
Schools: Kellogg Class of 2011
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 9

Re: I-Bank Training Programs Cut.... [#permalink] New post 01 Dec 2008, 11:34
I don't think they cut IB training programs, unless of course the company doesn't hire anyone.

Please understand the difference between 'Investment Banking' and 'Wealth Management working for an Investment Bank'. Wealth Management is not IB!!! I hate how everyone thinks that job cuts/hiring freezes/layoffs in I-Banking means client advisory or capital markets. In some cases it does, but in many others those cuts are only a small fraction of the total downsizing.
Re: I-Bank Training Programs Cut....   [#permalink] 01 Dec 2008, 11:34
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic The Sports Medicine Programs of the Olympic Training Center, Onell 6 22 Mar 2011, 23:22
2 The sports medicine program of the Olympic Training Centre maheshsrini 8 22 Aug 2010, 18:55
The Sports Medicine Programs of the Olympic Training Center, burnttwinky 4 01 Feb 2010, 20:15
7 Experts publish their posts in the topic The Sports Medicine Programs of the Olympic Training Center, tarek99 28 31 Mar 2008, 15:48
The sports medicine programs of the olympic training center, myc2004 14 24 Apr 2006, 18:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by

I-Bank Training Programs Cut....

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.