Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Oct 2014, 13:18

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

I do find the proposed OA debatable - the word many in it is

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Sep 2009
Posts: 53
WE 1: Real estate investment consulting
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 7

800-score V1 question [#permalink] New post 07 Dec 2009, 15:29
I do find the proposed OA debatable - the word many in it is what bothers me. What do you guys say?

Thanks for sharing your opinions!

During World War I, the issue of neutral rights on the seas plagued America’s foreign relations. One of the German justifications for its shoot-on-sight policy was the fragility of the U-boat and its vulnerability to armed vessels. To deal with this problem, in early 1916, Lansing proposed a modus vivendi: if the Allies agreed to disarm their merchant ships, the Germans would agree to not attack such vessels without warning and without protecting the safety of civilians. In effect, the submarine would act as a surface cruiser and observe the established rules of naval warfare.

Unwilling to surrender what they considered to be a right to arm surface vessels, the British rejected the proposal. Lansing quickly dropped the modus vivendi proposal. Unfortunately, he had opened a Pandora’s box. In explaining it to the German government, Lansing had implied that the American government regarded Allied
armed merchant vessels as warships. This had been the German position all along, and they seized on the opening the Americans had created. The Germans informed the Americans that their U-boats would resume attacks on armed merchant vessels without prior warning.

These events alarmed the pacifists. The Wilson administration, by dropping the modus vivendi, seemed to be saying that it accepted the British position that armed merchant vessels were not warships. If this were so, then by the administration’s interpretation, Americans would have the right to travel on such vessels. Since the Germans now intended to attack them on sight, Wilson was almost guaranteeing a collision with Germany. To avoid such a confrontation, Representative Jeff McLemore and Senator Thomas Gore introduced resolutions forbidding American travel on armed ships. Wilson interpreted this as a challenge to his leadership in foreign affairs and a surrender of American rights. “For my own part,” Wilson wrote the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, “I cannot consent to any abridgment of the rights of American citizens in any respect. Once we accept a single abatement of rights, many other humiliations would certainly follow, and the whole fine fabric of international law might crumble in our hands.” Congress backed down and tabled the Gore-McLemore resolutions. Wilson’s victory over Congress would later be viewed as a pivotal incident, since later attacks on U.S. shipping drew America into the war.

For what reason does the author say that the dropping of the modus vivendi alarmed the pacifists?(highlighted text)

A. To show that Wilson had few opponents
B. To show that many disagreed with Wilson.
C. To show that peacemakers feared the Germans.
D. To show that not everyone was against Germany
E. To show that America was in turmoil.

OA is B
Tuck Thread Master
User avatar
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 312
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Schools: Stanford (in), Tuck (WL), Wharton (ding), Cornell (in)
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 69

Re: 800-score V1 question [#permalink] New post 08 Dec 2009, 08:39
Where is this question from?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Sep 2009
Posts: 53
WE 1: Real estate investment consulting
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 7

Re: 800-score V1 question [#permalink] New post 08 Dec 2009, 09:04
800score.com tests - there are 5 Quant and 5 Verbal tests.
Re: 800-score V1 question   [#permalink] 08 Dec 2009, 09:04
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic Debatable OA jamifahad 13 21 Jun 2011, 10:51
Ozone layer - Debatable OA metallicafan 6 29 Dec 2010, 23:39
I do not agree with OA viveksharma 4 03 Sep 2008, 10:23
I do not agree with the OA.. ugo_castelo 4 12 Nov 2006, 12:48
I do not agree with the OA here... gmatornot 3 10 Aug 2006, 14:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by

I do find the proposed OA debatable - the word many in it is

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.