Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 18:07

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

I found this one debatable. This is from OG 11th edition

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2010
Posts: 20
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

I found this one debatable. This is from OG 11th edition [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2010, 16:45
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
I found this one debatable. This is from OG 11th edition Q62.

"A 1972 agreement... reduced the amount of phosphates municipalities ____ allowed to dump into the Great Lakes".

1. Are
2. Were
3. Had been

The original choices could be reduced down to the 1 and 3 (but I have included 2 as an additional possibility).

The OG is 1. However, I had selected 3, and I still think it should be either 2 or 3. My rationale is that the agreement did something in 1972, and not today. This should mean that it reduced the amount M were allowed to dump or had been allowed to dump, and not are allowed to dump back then.

What is there was another agreement in 1992 that increased the amount - the one in 1972 didnt decrease the amount M ARE allowed to dump then isnt it.

Is this one of those gray areas where we blindly agree with OG or am I missing some key grammatical rule here?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jan 2010
Posts: 135
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 3

Re: are, were or had been [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2010, 22:37
Its 'ARE' because the agreement is still in effect..
_________________

Regards
Ganesh
Class of 2012
Great Lakes Institute of Management
http://greatlakes.edu.in

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 193
Location: Finland
Schools: Admitted: IESE($$),HEC, RSM,Esade
WE 1: 3.5 years international
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 18

Re: are, were or had been [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2010, 23:02
The answer should be ARE. Because the agreement is still in place. If the passage mentioned that there is a new agreement replacing the 1972 one, then we should use WERE to denote past tense because then the agreement is no longer valid. But since the agreement is still valid, we are correct in using the word ARE as it denotes present tense.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2010
Posts: 20
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: are, were or had been [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2010, 16:42
Thanks guys. Although I see your point, I also think that #1 is based on the assumption that the agreement is still valid - which thus requires outside knowledge.

Now, thinking more about this, I think GMAT intentionally didn't provide #2 as an option. Perhaps #3 is wrong because "had been" is unnecessary - even if the agreement weren't valid today, "were" would be enough:

- A 1972 agreement reduced the amount of Phosphates Muncipalities WERE allowed to dump.. - sounds prefectly alright. Hence, "had been" actually gets ruled out by POE. So the question boils down to #1 (#2 wasn't provided).
Re: are, were or had been   [#permalink] 14 Oct 2010, 16:42
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
13 Experts publish their posts in the topic The price of lunch for 15 people was $207 including a 15% GMAT_700 22 06 Aug 2008, 16:13
OG 11th Edition umbdude 1 26 Sep 2006, 05:37
OG 11th Edition Philospher57 0 27 Jun 2006, 21:26
OG 11th edition? uvs_mba 3 04 Feb 2006, 12:50
OG 11th edition myc2004 1 05 Jan 2006, 15:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

I found this one debatable. This is from OG 11th edition

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.