Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 06 Feb 2016, 08:15

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# I found this one debatable. This is from OG 11th edition

Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Joined: 24 Sep 2010
Posts: 20
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

I found this one debatable. This is from OG 11th edition [#permalink]  13 Oct 2010, 16:45
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
I found this one debatable. This is from OG 11th edition Q62.

"A 1972 agreement... reduced the amount of phosphates municipalities ____ allowed to dump into the Great Lakes".

1. Are
2. Were

The original choices could be reduced down to the 1 and 3 (but I have included 2 as an additional possibility).

The OG is 1. However, I had selected 3, and I still think it should be either 2 or 3. My rationale is that the agreement did something in 1972, and not today. This should mean that it reduced the amount M were allowed to dump or had been allowed to dump, and not are allowed to dump back then.

What is there was another agreement in 1992 that increased the amount - the one in 1972 didnt decrease the amount M ARE allowed to dump then isnt it.

Is this one of those gray areas where we blindly agree with OG or am I missing some key grammatical rule here?
Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2010
Posts: 135
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 3

Its 'ARE' because the agreement is still in effect..
_________________

Regards
Ganesh
Class of 2012
Great Lakes Institute of Management
http://greatlakes.edu.in

Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 193
Location: Finland
Schools: Admitted: IESE(),HEC, RSM,Esade
WE 1: 3.5 years international
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 18

The answer should be ARE. Because the agreement is still in place. If the passage mentioned that there is a new agreement replacing the 1972 one, then we should use WERE to denote past tense because then the agreement is no longer valid. But since the agreement is still valid, we are correct in using the word ARE as it denotes present tense.
Intern
Joined: 24 Sep 2010
Posts: 20
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Thanks guys. Although I see your point, I also think that #1 is based on the assumption that the agreement is still valid - which thus requires outside knowledge.

Now, thinking more about this, I think GMAT intentionally didn't provide #2 as an option. Perhaps #3 is wrong because "had been" is unnecessary - even if the agreement weren't valid today, "were" would be enough:

- A 1972 agreement reduced the amount of Phosphates Muncipalities WERE allowed to dump.. - sounds prefectly alright. Hence, "had been" actually gets ruled out by POE. So the question boils down to #1 (#2 wasn't provided).
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 These are the two questions from OG12. In one it says usage 4 25 Jun 2011, 06:32
3 I found the following piece of information on one of 4 18 Sep 2010, 02:27
From icandy: I apologize. I did not mean to edit. I wanted 3 23 Oct 2008, 11:03
From the LSAT bible I found this to be extremely helpful in 0 04 Mar 2008, 11:21
1 I found this material in one of the websites. I found it 0 06 Aug 2006, 04:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by