Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 17 Sep 2014, 08:10

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

I found this sentence on CNN. Does this sentence look ok to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 539
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
I found this sentence on CNN. Does this sentence look ok to [#permalink] New post 26 Apr 2007, 10:54
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
I found this sentence on CNN. Does this sentence look ok to you?

Junnier and Smith had been charged in the indictment with felony murder, violation of oath by a public officer, criminal solicitation, burglary, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and making false statements.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Nov 2006
Posts: 144
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - CNN sentence [#permalink] New post 26 Apr 2007, 11:39
[quote="ggarr"]I found this sentence on CNN. Does this sentence look ok to you?

Junnier and Smith had been charged in the indictment with felony murder, violation of oath by a public officer, criminal solicitation, burglary, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and making false statements.[/quote]

This sentence has severe problems with parallelism! In addition, on the Gmat you'll expect to see a comma before the last item of a list (e.g. "...had been charged with X, Y, and Z")
The use of "had been charged" should be analyzed within the context of the text, do you have the whole text?
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 539
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 Apr 2007, 11:54
That is the entire para.
But here is the link to the article jic:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/04/26/atlan ... index.html

I dunno if you noticed but there is an "and" before the last item in the list.
Also, what's wrong with the parallelism?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Nov 2006
Posts: 144
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 26 Apr 2007, 22:36
[quote="ggarr"]That is the entire para.
But here is the link to the article jic:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/04/26/atlan ... index.html

I dunno if you noticed but there is an "and" before the last item in the list.
Also, what's wrong with the parallelism?[/quote]


Parallelism: тАЬтАжcharged with A,B,C,D,E, and FтАЭ
A: felony murder
B: violation of oath by a public officer
C: criminal solicitaction
D: burglary
E: aggravated assault with a deadly weapon
F: making false statements

If you have a look at the above items, you will find discrepancies in the parallel structures among the items in the list. For instance, item F (verb+adj+noun) is not parallel with D (noun). Do you see the difference? As a rule, ALL items in a given list MUST be grammatically parallel. In addition, before the last item of the list you should have the following structure тАЬ, andтАЭ. The list of items in the text has got the word тАЬandтАЭ but fails to include the comma, the sentence should read тАЬ..deadly weapon, and making false statementsтАЭ

Regarding the verb tense, within the context of the text the use of тАЬhad been chargedтАЭ is correct. The author uses this verb tense to show that this action happened before (тАЬ..earlier ThursdayтАЭ) the other actions he is describing.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Posts: 6
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 27 Apr 2007, 05:22
Junnier and Smith, who is on administrative leave, had been charged in an indictment unsealed earlier Thursday with felony murder, violation of oath by a public officer, criminal solicitation, burglary, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and making false statements.

Shouldn't it be :
Junnier and Smith[ as AND makes it a compund subject ] , who ARE on administrative leave, HAVE been charged in an indictment unsealed earlier ........
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 539
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 27 Apr 2007, 14:24
querio wrote:
ggarr wrote:
That is the entire para.
But here is the link to the article jic:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/04/26/atlan ... index.html

I dunno if you noticed but there is an "and" before the last item in the list.
Also, what's wrong with the parallelism?



Parallelism: “…charged with A,B,C,D,E, and Fâ€
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Nov 2006
Posts: 144
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 28 Apr 2007, 10:43
The article was changed to read:
[quote]Junnier and Smith [b]had been charged[/b] in an indictment [b]unsealed[/b] earlier Thursday with felony murder, violation of oath by a public officer, criminal solicitation, burglary, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and making false statements.[/quote]
This is ok in my book, however, the original sentence was flawed. I think the simple past tense (were) would've been suffice. Do you agree?

Sure, it should be simple past (were).

Here is the orig:[quote]Junnier and Smith, who is on administrative leave, [b]were charged[/b] with felony murder, violation of oath by a public officer, criminal solicitation, burglary, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and making false statements.[/quote]
And I think they're referring to Smith who is on admin leave. So that might be ok. Also, how would you reconcile the lack of parallelism?[/quote]

I agree, the 'who' is referring to Smith. The reconstruction of the lack of parallelism is a bit more complicated, you have to find new words/phrases for many of the items displayed in the list. The idea is that you MUST ensure that ALL items listed are grammatically parallel.
E.g. "... verb, verb, and verb"; "... adj+noun, adj+noun, and adj+noun", etc...
  [#permalink] 28 Apr 2007, 10:43
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Is the sentence looks correct ? grakesh 2 07 Apr 2013, 08:03
Is it ok to use whether twice in the same sentence? For mainhoon 5 27 Oct 2010, 09:31
1 I have found cutting unnecessary words out for Sentence trunksli 2 22 Aug 2010, 13:30
I found these 2 sentences. A number of men has/have ggarr 3 30 Apr 2007, 15:33
Does this sentence sound weird? batchgmat 14 05 Jan 2007, 12:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

I found this sentence on CNN. Does this sentence look ok to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.