I'm having trouble with the rule behind this concept. This : Quant Question Archive [LOCKED]
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 Jan 2017, 00:32

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# I'm having trouble with the rule behind this concept. This

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 11 Apr 2008
Posts: 128
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

I'm having trouble with the rule behind this concept. This [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2008, 15:24
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

I'm having trouble with the rule behind this concept. This problem is a good example of my confusion:

If y is an integer, is y divisible by 3?
(1) y = 2x^3 + 9x^2 - 5x
(2) x is indivisible by 3

Here is what I did:

(1) factor out an x --> x (2x^2 + 9x - 5)
factor the quadratic --> x (2x - 1) (x + 5)
so, y is the product of 3 integers and I wrote down that since 3 integers are multiplied together, it must be that it is divisible by 3. HOWEVER, I thought that this rule ONLY applies if the integers that are multiplied together are consecutive!!!

For example, x (x - 1) (x -4) is not divisible by 3 (even though it is the product of 3 numbers) because the parts are not consecutive.

_________________

Factorials were someone's attempt to make math look exciting!!!

Director
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 518
Schools: Wharton
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 0

Re: Last minute help....(test in 2 days) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2008, 16:07
brokerbevo wrote:
I'm having trouble with the rule behind this concept. This problem is a good example of my confusion:

If y is an integer, is y divisible by 3?
(1) y = 2x^3 + 9x^2 - 5x
(2) x is indivisible by 3

Here is what I did:

(1) factor out an x --> x (2x^2 + 9x - 5)
factor the quadratic --> x (2x - 1) (x + 5)
so, y is the product of 3 integers and I wrote down that since 3 integers are multiplied together, it must be that it is divisible by 3. HOWEVER, I thought that this rule ONLY applies if the integers that are multiplied together are consecutive!!!

For example, x (x - 1) (x -4) is not divisible by 3 (even though it is the product of 3 numbers) because the parts are not consecutive.

Yes, the rule does only apply to the product of three consecutive integers. This is because one of those consecutive integers, by definition, is divisible by 3 by itself.
Manager
Joined: 11 Apr 2008
Posts: 128
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Re: Last minute help....(test in 2 days) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2008, 16:12
zoinnk wrote:
brokerbevo wrote:
I'm having trouble with the rule behind this concept. This problem is a good example of my confusion:

If y is an integer, is y divisible by 3?
(1) y = 2x^3 + 9x^2 - 5x
(2) x is indivisible by 3

Here is what I did:

(1) factor out an x --> x (2x^2 + 9x - 5)
factor the quadratic --> x (2x - 1) (x + 5)
so, y is the product of 3 integers and I wrote down that since 3 integers are multiplied together, it must be that it is divisible by 3. HOWEVER, I thought that this rule ONLY applies if the integers that are multiplied together are consecutive!!!

For example, x (x - 1) (x -4) is not divisible by 3 (even though it is the product of 3 numbers) because the parts are not consecutive.

Yes, the rule does only apply to the product of three consecutive integers. This is because one of those consecutive integers, by definition, is divisible by 3 by itself.

Ok good, that's what I thought but didn't know for sure. So, in that case, how do you solve the above problem?
_________________

Factorials were someone's attempt to make math look exciting!!!

SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2492
Followers: 68

Kudos [?]: 736 [0], given: 19

Re: Last minute help....(test in 2 days) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2008, 16:41
brokerbevo wrote:
I'm having trouble with the rule behind this concept. This problem is a good example of my confusion:

If y is an integer, is y divisible by 3?
(1) y = 2x^3 + 9x^2 - 5x
(2) x is indivisible by 3

Here is what I did:

(1) factor out an x --> x (2x^2 + 9x - 5)
factor the quadratic --> x (2x - 1) (x + 5)
so, y is the product of 3 integers and I wrote down that since 3 integers are multiplied together, it must be that it is divisible by 3. HOWEVER, I thought that this rule ONLY applies if the integers that are multiplied together are consecutive!!!

For example, x (x - 1) (x -4) is not divisible by 3 (even though it is the product of 3 numbers) because the parts are not consecutive.

you are almost there.

(1) y = 2x^3 + 9x^2 - 5x = x (2x^2 + 9x - 5) = x (2x - 1) (x + 5)

plug-in: any integer value for x in the above expression is divisible by 3.
if x = 2: x (2x - 1) (x + 5) = 2 (2x2 - 1) (2+5) = 2 x 3 x 7. suff.
if x = 4: x (2x - 1) (x + 5) = 4 (2x4 - 1) (4+5) = 4 x 7 x 9. suff.
if x = 5: x (2x - 1) (x + 5) = 5 (2x5 - 1) (5+5) = 4 x 9 x 10. suff.
if x = 7: x (2x - 1) (x + 5) = 7 (2x7 - 1) (7+5) = 7 x 13 x 12. suff.

i believe every integer value for x result y divisible by 3.

2: x = 3k is not sufficient.

So //A//
_________________

Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html

GT

GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1183
Followers: 422

Kudos [?]: 1511 [0], given: 4

Re: Last minute help....(test in 2 days) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2008, 18:45
brokerbevo wrote:
I'm having trouble with the rule behind this concept. This problem is a good example of my confusion:

If y is an integer, is y divisible by 3?
(1) y = 2x^3 + 9x^2 - 5x
(2) x is indivisible by 3

Here is what I did:

(1) factor out an x --> x (2x^2 + 9x - 5)
factor the quadratic --> x (2x - 1) (x + 5)
so, y is the product of 3 integers and I wrote down that since 3 integers are multiplied together, it must be that it is divisible by 3. HOWEVER, I thought that this rule ONLY applies if the integers that are multiplied together are consecutive!!!

For example, x (x - 1) (x -4) is not divisible by 3 (even though it is the product of 3 numbers) because the parts are not consecutive.

Well, it doesn't *only* apply when the integers are consecutive. Say x is an integer. You know already that one of x, x+1 or x+2 is a multiple of 3. Well, that guarantees that one of, say, x, x+4, and x+8 is divisible by 3 (because if x+1 is, then x+1+3 = x+4 is, and if x+2 is, so is x+2 + 6 = x+8), and many other combinations besides.

You can apply that logic here if you want. We know that one of these numbers: x, x+1 or x+2 is a multiple of 3:

-If x is a multiple of 3, then x is a multiple of 3
-If x+1 is a multiple of 3, then 2x+2 is also a multiple of 3, and (subtract 3) 2x-1 is also a multiple of 3
-If x+2 is a multiple of 3, then x+2+3 = x+5 is also a multiple of 3.

So one of x, 2x-1 or x+5 will always be a multiple of 3, and since y = x (2x - 1) (x + 5), y must be a multiple of 3.

There are other ways to go about the question that might be preferable here (modular arithmetic, for example); I just wanted to show how you can extend the logic about 'consecutive numbers' to this situation.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1569
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 250 [0], given: 0

Re: Last minute help....(test in 2 days) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2008, 22:34
But, the question stem does not specifically mention that x is an integer....hence I will go with C.
SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2492
Followers: 68

Kudos [?]: 736 [0], given: 19

Re: Last minute help....(test in 2 days) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2008, 10:55
scthakur wrote:
But, the question stem does not specifically mention that x is an integer....hence I will go with C.

Do you have any non-integer value for x that yeilds an integer value for y?

any example?
_________________

Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html

GT

VP
Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Posts: 1043
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 570 [0], given: 1

Re: Last minute help....(test in 2 days) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2008, 23:30
GMAT TIGER wrote:
brokerbevo wrote:
I'm having trouble with the rule behind this concept. This problem is a good example of my confusion:

If y is an integer, is y divisible by 3?
(1) y = 2x^3 + 9x^2 - 5x
(2) x is indivisible by 3

Here is what I did:

(1) factor out an x --> x (2x^2 + 9x - 5)
factor the quadratic --> x (2x - 1) (x + 5)
so, y is the product of 3 integers and I wrote down that since 3 integers are multiplied together, it must be that it is divisible by 3. HOWEVER, I thought that this rule ONLY applies if the integers that are multiplied together are consecutive!!!

For example, x (x - 1) (x -4) is not divisible by 3 (even though it is the product of 3 numbers) because the parts are not consecutive.

you are almost there.

(1) y = 2x^3 + 9x^2 - 5x = x (2x^2 + 9x - 5) = x (2x - 1) (x + 5)

plug-in: any integer value for x in the above expression is divisible by 3.
if x = 2: x (2x - 1) (x + 5) = 2 (2x2 - 1) (2+5) = 2 x 3 x 7. suff.
if x = 4: x (2x - 1) (x + 5) = 4 (2x4 - 1) (4+5) = 4 x 7 x 9. suff.
if x = 5: x (2x - 1) (x + 5) = 5 (2x5 - 1) (5+5) = 4 x 9 x 10. suff.
if x = 7: x (2x - 1) (x + 5) = 7 (2x7 - 1) (7+5) = 7 x 13 x 12. suff.

i believe every integer value for x result y divisible by 3.

2: x = 3k is not sufficient.

So //A//

GMAT TIGER, why are we trying only integer values of x here ? The stem does not mention anything about x, it could be a fraction also.
_________________

"You have to find it. No one else can find it for you." - Bjorn Borg

VP
Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Posts: 1043
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 570 [0], given: 1

Re: Last minute help....(test in 2 days) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2008, 23:35
IanStewart wrote:

-If x is a multiple of 3, then x is a multiple of 3
-If x+1 is a multiple of 3, then 2x+2 is also a multiple of 3, and (subtract 3) 2x-1 is also a multiple of 3
-If x+2 is a multiple of 3, then x+2+3 = x+5 is also a multiple of 3.

So one of x, 2x-1 or x+5 will always be a multiple of 3, and since y = x (2x - 1) (x + 5), y must be a multiple of 3.

There are other ways to go about the question that might be preferable here (modular arithmetic, for example); I just wanted to show how you can extend the logic about 'consecutive numbers' to this situation.

If x is a multiple of 3, then x is a multiple of 3 . I guess there is a typo or am I missing the concept ?

Ian how do we apply modular arithmetic here ? Please guide.

Thanks
_________________

"You have to find it. No one else can find it for you." - Bjorn Borg

GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1183
Followers: 422

Kudos [?]: 1511 [0], given: 4

Re: Last minute help....(test in 2 days) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2008, 06:13
amitdgr wrote:

If x is a multiple of 3, then x is a multiple of 3 . I guess there is a typo or am I missing the concept ?

No typo- I was just pointing out that one of x, x+5 or 2x-1 must be a multiple of 3, and if x is a multiple of 3, then it's just obvious that one of the three expressions is a multiple of 3.

I can explain how to approach this with modular arithmetic, but be aware that you won't need modular arithmetic on the GMAT. It would take me too long to explain the theory, so if you don't know modular arithmetic already, don't worry about it!

We want to know if

2x^3 + 9x^2 - 5x ~ 0 (mod 3)

We don't need to bother simplifying, but it makes things slightly easier: since 9 ~ 0 mod 3, and -5 ~ 1 mod 3, we just want to know if:

2x^3 + x ~ 0 (mod 3)

Now it's easy to check that if x ~ 0, 1 or 2 (mod 3), that 2x^3 + x is always congruent to 0 (mod 3), so it must be divisible by 3.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1183
Followers: 422

Kudos [?]: 1511 [0], given: 4

Re: Last minute help....(test in 2 days) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2008, 06:21
GMAT TIGER wrote:
scthakur wrote:
But, the question stem does not specifically mention that x is an integer....hence I will go with C.

Do you have any non-integer value for x that yeilds an integer value for y?

any example?

y = 2x^3 + 9x^2 - 5x is a continuous function with an unrestricted range, so y can take on any value at all (graph it on the co-ordinate plane and you'll see why). I've ignored the possibility, in my posts above, that x is not an integer, because on the GMAT you would never see a question like this unless you were told in the question that x is an integer. I assumed there was a typo in the question, and that it was meant to begin "If x is an integer" rather than "If y is an integer". If the question doesn't mention this, it's really testing whether you know properties of continuous functions, something you learn in calculus, not in GMAT prep.

Still, if we accept the possibility that x is not an integer, the answer is not C, since Statement 2 is not at all helpful in this case; the answer would be E. But I'm sure the intended answer is A, and that the question intends for x to be an integer.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

Re: Last minute help....(test in 2 days)   [#permalink] 19 Sep 2008, 06:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by