I think there is some serious flaw in my understanding of : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 09 Dec 2016, 18:29

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# I think there is some serious flaw in my understanding of

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
Posts: 26
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 5

I think there is some serious flaw in my understanding of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2010, 19:30
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (01:31) correct 50% (00:06) wrong based on 6 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

I think there is some serious flaw in my understanding of the use of HAD.
Need some help with this. I have my GMAT on Wednesday; cannot afford to make such fundamental mistakes.

Before the storm destroyed much of the harbor, this town, with its sandy beaches and multiple opportunities for sports, had been one of the most popular resort destinations on the East Coast.

(b) has been
(d) was being
(e) was

In my view:
(a) is correct because 'Had' is required with the verb which takes place first as the sentence has two action: 'destroy' and 'being a popular resort destination'. .
Pls. help me find the gap in my understanding. Thx.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Retired Moderator
Joined: 03 Aug 2010
Posts: 246
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 37 [1] , given: 41

Re: I think there is some serious flaw in my understanding of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2010, 19:44
1
KUDOS
hey dude,

go thru this link... am sure it will reduce your tension, it really helped me.

http://www.beatthegmat.com/present-perf ... 49438.html
_________________

http://www.gmatpill.com/gmat-practice-test/

Amazing Platform

Ms. Big Fat Panda
Status: Three Down.
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1922
Concentration: General Management, Nonprofit
Followers: 443

Kudos [?]: 1958 [0], given: 210

Re: I think there is some serious flaw in my understanding of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2010, 20:36
I usually follow a simple time line when I have to decide between simple past or past perfect.

Provided the events are connected to one another (i.e one influences the other in some way) and they are NOT parallel, then you use the time-line and say that the event that happened in the far past takes a perfect tense and the event in the near past takes a simple tense.

In this case, we can clearly see that the events are linked, but the word "before" indicates that you don't need to use a perfect tense. But in the following case:

Quote:
Before its independence in 1947, Britain ruled India as a colony and they would relinquish power only after a long struggle by the native people.

A. Before its independence in 1947, Britain ruled India as a colony and they would relinquish power
B. Before independence in 1947, Britain had ruled India as a colony and relinquished power
C. Before its independence in 1947, India was ruled by Britain as a colony and they relinquished power
D. Before independence in 1947, India had been ruled as a colony by Britain, which relinquished power
E. Before independence in 1947, India had been a colony of the British, who relinquished power

Just by looking at the sentence, you can see that the modifier is misplaced. "Before its independence in 1947" refers to India and not Britain. So you can eliminate options A and B immediately.

Let's look at the remaining issues and answer choices now:

C: The modifier issue is corrected, but "they relinquished power" uses the wrong pronoun. No matter which antecedent you're referring to by using "they" it's wrong since all the entities mentioned take singular pronouns.

D: "India had been ruled as a colony by Britain, which relinquished power" adopts a passive voice and hence is not preferred on the GMAT. Also, Britain as a country did not relinquish power - the British people relinquished power, so the use of "which" in this scenario is also wrong.

E: This sentence correctly makes use of the modifier, and converts the pronoun to refer to the antecedent British, and hence corrects that issue as well.

A lot of people find this one confusing since you use a perfect tense here despite being given the word "before" - so in this situation, the other answers all had OTHER wrong elements. Though the usage of simple perfect is preferred in this situation, option E is grammatically consistent and the best among the given choices. Similarly, in the question you posted, if "was" was not an option, then "had been" would have been the right answer.
Intern
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
Posts: 26
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 5

Re: I think there is some serious flaw in my understanding of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2010, 23:22
Thx. and kudos.

whiplash2411 wrote:
I usually follow a simple time line when I have to decide between simple past or past perfect.

Provided the events are connected to one another (i.e one influences the other in some way) and they are NOT parallel, then you use the time-line and say that the event that happened in the far past takes a perfect tense and the event in the near past takes a simple tense.

In this case, we can clearly see that the events are linked, but the word "before" indicates that you don't need to use a perfect tense. But in the following case:

Quote:
Before its independence in 1947, Britain ruled India as a colony and they would relinquish power only after a long struggle by the native people.

A. Before its independence in 1947, Britain ruled India as a colony and they would relinquish power
B. Before independence in 1947, Britain had ruled India as a colony and relinquished power
C. Before its independence in 1947, India was ruled by Britain as a colony and they relinquished power
D. Before independence in 1947, India had been ruled as a colony by Britain, which relinquished power
E. Before independence in 1947, India had been a colony of the British, who relinquished power

Just by looking at the sentence, you can see that the modifier is misplaced. "Before its independence in 1947" refers to India and not Britain. So you can eliminate options A and B immediately.

Let's look at the remaining issues and answer choices now:

C: The modifier issue is corrected, but "they relinquished power" uses the wrong pronoun. No matter which antecedent you're referring to by using "they" it's wrong since all the entities mentioned take singular pronouns.

D: "India had been ruled as a colony by Britain, which relinquished power" adopts a passive voice and hence is not preferred on the GMAT. Also, Britain as a country did not relinquish power - the British people relinquished power, so the use of "which" in this scenario is also wrong.

E: This sentence correctly makes use of the modifier, and converts the pronoun to refer to the antecedent British, and hence corrects that issue as well.

A lot of people find this one confusing since you use a perfect tense here despite being given the word "before" - so in this situation, the other answers all had OTHER wrong elements. Though the usage of simple perfect is preferred in this situation, option E is grammatically consistent and the best among the given choices. Similarly, in the question you posted, if "was" was not an option, then "had been" would have been the right answer.
Re: I think there is some serious flaw in my understanding of   [#permalink] 26 Dec 2010, 23:22
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 To understand why some people are incapable 10 30 Sep 2015, 20:16
Although some people think of New York as the quintessential 0 18 Dec 2012, 08:14
I want to understand why the following structure is correct 1 13 Mar 2010, 08:47
based on my understanding of as likely/more likely, I did 4 15 Aug 2007, 11:08
I completely do not understand the structure of the below 8 15 Apr 2007, 19:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by