Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 May 2013, 01:52
Customize  |  Hide

I've been working through the PG 10th edition, and came

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 60
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

I've been working through the PG 10th edition, and came [#permalink] New post 23 Feb 2007, 09:42
I've been working through the PG 10th edition, and came across 2 questions I had trouble with in a row. # 63 and 64 in problem solving.

If each of the following fractions were written as a repeating decimal, which would have the longest sequence of different digits?

A. 2/11
B. 1/3
C. 41/99
D. 2/3
E. 23/37


I knew 1/3 and 2/3 only had 1 digit repeating from memory, but how are you supposed to figure out the other 3 fractions without actually doing the division? I figured out the trick with fractions with a denominator of 11 after doing this problem, but I still wouldn't know how to easily compare these fractions.


Today Rose is twice as old as Sam and Sam is 3 years younger than Tina. If Rose, Sam, and Tina are all alive 4 years from today, which of the following must be true on that day?

1. Rose is twice as old as Sam
2. Sam is 3 years younger than Tina
3. Rose is older than Tina

(A) 1 only
(B) 2 only
(C) 3 only
(D) 1 and 2
(E) 2 and 3

1 is obviously not true, since you added 4 to the ages so it wouldn't stay doubles. 2 is obviously true, as the difference would stay the same.

The problem I have is with the third statment. If you R=2S and S=T-3, it comes out to R>T only if 2(T-3)>T or T>6. The OA says because of this restriction only statement 2 is true.

I got to this point, but I reasoned that since Sam is 3 years young than Tina, the youngest Tina could be is 3, since Sam couldn't have a negative age. 4 years later, the youngest Tina could be is 7, which is > 6 and thus makes statement 3 true. Am I right and is the OA wrong?
I've been working through the PG 10th edition, and came   [#permalink] 23 Feb 2007, 09:42
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC The Official Guide for GMAT Review, 10th Edition Praetorian 10 01 May 2004, 02:43
New posts OG 10th Edition RJ417 1 30 Sep 2005, 13:01
New posts I've been working through the PG 10th edition, and came maxpowers 3 23 Feb 2007, 09:47
New posts OG-10th edition or 12th edition rite2deepti 5 03 Oct 2010, 21:11
New posts EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Rate the 10th Edition OG m990540 2 11 Mar 2011, 08:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by

I've been working through the PG 10th edition, and came

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.