Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

If 0 < r < 1 < s < 2, which of the following must be less than 1? I. r/s II. rs III. s - r

A. I only B. II only C. III only D. I and II E. I and III

Notice that we are asked "which of the following MUST be lees than 1, not COULD be less than 1. For such kind of questions if you can prove that a statement is NOT true for one particular set of numbers, it will mean that this statement is not always true and hence not a correct answer.

Given: \(0 < r < s\) --> divide by \(s\) (we can safely do this since we know that \(s>0\)) --> \(\frac{r}{s}<1\), so I must be true;

II. rs: if \(r=\frac{9}{10}<1\) and \(1<(s=\frac{10}{9})<2\) then \(rs=1\), so this statement is not alway true;

III. s-r: if \(r=0.5<1\) and 1\(<(s=1.5)<2\) then \(s-r=1\), so this statement is not alway true.

So the best strategy is to pick numbers in these ques?

Number picking is a good strategy for such kind of questions, though as you can see we proved that I is true with algebra (so to prove that a statement MUST be true you might need an algebraic or logical/conceptual approach).

Generally it really depends on the problem to pick the way of handling it. Check the link in my previous post to see bunch of Must or Could be True Questions solved using different approaches.
_________________

Re: If 0<r<1<s<2. Which of the following must be less than 1. [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Sep 2014, 19:39

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: If 0<r<1<s<2. Which of the following must be less than 1. [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Oct 2015, 14:28

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: If 0<r<1<s<2. Which of the following must be less than 1. [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Jul 2016, 17:14

Curious if this can be solved this way:

Given: 0<r<1<s<2

1. r/s <1 = r<s (yes)

2. rs<1 = r<1/s (no)

3. s-r<1 = s<r (no)

So only 1 must be true?

Bunuel wrote:

If 0 < r < 1 < s < 2, which of the following must be less than 1? I. r/s II. rs III. s - r

A. I only B. II only C. III only D. I and II E. I and III

Notice that we are asked "which of the following MUST be lees than 1, not COULD be less than 1. For such kind of questions if you can prove that a statement is NOT true for one particular set of numbers, it will mean that this statement is not always true and hence not a correct answer.

Given: \(0 < r < s\) --> divide by \(s\) (we can safely do this since we know that \(s>0\)) --> \(\frac{r}{s}<1\), so I must be true;

II. rs: if \(r=\frac{9}{10}<1\) and \(1<(s=\frac{10}{9})<2\) then \(rs=1\), so this statement is not alway true;

III. s-r: if \(r=0.5<1\) and 1\(<(s=1.5)<2\) then \(s-r=1\), so this statement is not alway true.

Also, s-r<1 is not the same as s < r. It is the same as s < 1 + r.

To prove 2, think of a case such as r = 3/4 and s = 4/3. The product is 1, not less than 1. To prove 3, think what happens when r is very close to 0 and s is very close to 2. Then s - r is almost 2, not less than 1.
_________________

Re: If 0<r<1<s<2. Which of the following must be less than 1. [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Jul 2016, 05:22

Thank you Karishma. Testing numbers seems like a much better way to solve these. Also, thanks for pointing out mistakes in my calculations!

VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:

nk18967 wrote:

Curious if this can be solved this way:

Given: 0<r<1<s<2

1. r/s <1 = r<s (yes)

2. rs<1 = r<1/s (no)

3. s-r<1 = s<r (no)

So only 1 must be true?

Not sure how you arrive at this: = r<1/s (no)

Also, s-r<1 is not the same as s < r. It is the same as s < 1 + r.

To prove 2, think of a case such as r = 3/4 and s = 4/3. The product is 1, not less than 1. To prove 3, think what happens when r is very close to 0 and s is very close to 2. Then s - r is almost 2, not less than 1.

gmatclubot

Re: If 0<r<1<s<2. Which of the following must be less than 1.
[#permalink]
21 Jul 2016, 05:22

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Post-MBA I became very intrigued by how senior leaders navigated their career progression. It was also at this time that I realized I learned nothing about this during my...