Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Can we do this question algebraically without substituting fractions? By trying to prove that each of the statements given indeed have x values within the range of 0 and 1 on the number line?

Using wavy line method we know that for \(0 < x < 1\) the inequality holds true

Thus all the three inequalities are true for the range \(0 < x < 1\)

Hope it's clear

Regards Harsh

Quote:

Thanks Harsh for your reply. Can you please throw some more light on the wave method? Of what I knw, signs usually alternate but what I see in your workings, signs don't always alternate. Can you explain it? Second, why are we ignoring the negative portions say in statement 1 that makes it less than -1. It shows x values dont only pertain to 0 and 1 region. So how can stmt 1 be sufficient?

You are right when you say signs usually alternate around zero points of the inequality but they only alternate when the expression is sign dependent i.e. for odd powers. For example sign of \(x^3\) is dependent on the sign of \(x\) but sign of \(x^2\) is independent of sign of \(x\). Hence for expressions, signs of which are independent of the signs of their base variable, the wave would not alternate but rather bounce back to the same region it is currently in.

I would also suggest you to go through this post on Wavy Line method which will help you understand it better.

For your second query, in st-I the range of \(x\) for which the inequality holds is \(0 < x < 1\) or \(x < -1\) as seen from the wavy line diagram. However as the question asks us if the inequality is true for the range \(0 < x < 1\), we are not concerned about the other possible values of x for which the inequality is true. Once the inequality satisfies the range \(0 < x < 1\), we have our answer.

If 0 < x < 1, which of the following inequalities must be true ?

I. \(x^5 < x^3\) II. \(x^4 + x^5 < x^3 + x^2\) III. \(x^4 - x^5 < x^2 - x^3\)

A. None B. I only C. II only D. I and II only E. I, II and III

If 0 < x < 1, then x > x^2 > x^3 > x^4 > x^5 ...

I. \(x^5 < x^3\). True.

II. \(x^4 + x^5 < x^3 + x^2\). Each term on the left hand side is less than each term on the right hand side, thus LHS < RHS.

III. \(x^4 - x^5 < x^2 - x^3\) --> \(x^4(1 - x) < x^2(1 - x)\). Since 0 < x < 1, then 1 - x > 0, so we can reduce by it: \(x^4 < x^2\). True.

Answer: E.

Hope it's clear.

Bunuel

Can we do this question algebraically without substituting fractions? By trying to prove that each of the statements given indeed have x values within the range of 0 and 1 on the number line?

Re: If 0 < x < 1, which of the following inequalities must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Oct 2008, 08:36

My two cents:

I beeter if you divided by x^2: x^2+x^3<x+1 -> always II better if you divided by x^2: x^2-x^3<1-x^2 always III dividing by x^2: x^2-x^3<1-x^2 if x=0.1 thus 0.01-0.001<1-0.01 always if x=0.9 thus 0.81-0.729<1-0.9 // 0.081<1 always

E

OA?

Cheers
_________________

mates, please visit my profile and leave comments http://gmatclub.com/forum/johnlewis1980-s-profile-feedback-is-more-than-welcome-80538.html

I'm not linked to GMAT questions anymore, so, if you need something, please PM me

I'm already focused on my application package

My experience in my second attempt http://gmatclub.com/forum/p544312#p544312 My experience in my third attempt http://gmatclub.com/forum/630-q-47-v-28-engineer-non-native-speaker-my-experience-78215.html#p588275

Re: If 0 < x < 1, which of the following inequalities must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Oct 2008, 09:01

I also believe the answer is E since even the third equation, x^4 - x^5 < x^2 - x^3 = x^4 + x^3 < x^2 + x^5 =x^2 + x < 1+x^3 which is true since the value on the right hand side will be greater than 1.

Re: If 0 < x < 1, which of the following inequalities must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 May 2015, 22:43

Bunuel wrote:

scofield1521 wrote:

People, please throw some more light!!

If 0 < x < 1, which of the following inequalities must be true ?

I. \(x^5 < x^3\) II. \(x^4 + x^5 < x^3 + x^2\) III. \(x^4 - x^5 < x^2 - x^3\)

A. None B. I only C. II only D. I and II only E. I, II and III

If 0 < x < 1, then x > x^2 > x^3 > x^4 > x^5 ...

I. \(x^5 < x^3\). True.

II. \(x^4 + x^5 < x^3 + x^2\). Each term on the left hand side is less than each term on the right hand side, thus LHS < RHS.

III. \(x^4 - x^5 < x^2 - x^3\) --> \(x^4(1 - x) < x^2(1 - x)\). Since 0 < x < 1, then 1 - x > 0, so we can reduce by it: \(x^4 < x^2\). True.

Answer: E.

Hope it's clear.

Bunuel

Can we do this question algebraically without substituting fractions? By trying to prove that each of the statements given indeed have x values within the range of 0 and 1 on the number line?

Re: If 0 < x < 1, which of the following inequalities must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 May 2015, 23:52

Bunuel

Can we do this question algebraically without substituting fractions? By trying to prove that each of the statements given indeed have x values within the range of 0 and 1 on the number line?[/quote]

Using wavy line method we know that for \(0 < x < 1\) the inequality holds true

Thus all the three inequalities are true for the range \(0 < x < 1\)

Hope it's clear

Regards Harsh[/quote]

Thanks Harsh for your reply. Can you please throw some more light on the wave method? Of what I knw, signs usually alternate but what I see in your workings, signs don't always alternate. Can you explain it? Second, why are we ignoring the negative portions say in statement 1 that makes it less than -1. It shows x values dont only pertain to 0 and 1 region. So how can stmt 1 be sufficient?

Re: If 0 < x < 1, which of the following inequalities must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 May 2015, 22:58

EgmatQuantExpert wrote:

Quote:

Bunuel

Can we do this question algebraically without substituting fractions? By trying to prove that each of the statements given indeed have x values within the range of 0 and 1 on the number line?

Using wavy line method we know that for \(0 < x < 1\) the inequality holds true

Thus all the three inequalities are true for the range \(0 < x < 1\)

Hope it's clear

Regards Harsh

Quote:

Thanks Harsh for your reply. Can you please throw some more light on the wave method? Of what I knw, signs usually alternate but what I see in your workings, signs don't always alternate. Can you explain it? Second, why are we ignoring the negative portions say in statement 1 that makes it less than -1. It shows x values dont only pertain to 0 and 1 region. So how can stmt 1 be sufficient?

You are right when you say signs usually alternate around zero points of the inequality but they only alternate when the expression is sign dependent i.e. for odd powers. For example sign of \(x^3\) is dependent on the sign of \(x\) but sign of \(x^2\) is independent of sign of \(x\). Hence for expressions, signs of which are independent of the signs of their base variable, the wave would not alternate but rather bounce back to the same region it is currently in.

I would also suggest you to go through this post on Wavy Line method which will help you understand it better.

For your second query, in st-I the range of \(x\) for which the inequality holds is \(0 < x < 1\) or \(x < -1\) as seen from the wavy line diagram. However as the question asks us if the inequality is true for the range \(0 < x < 1\), we are not concerned about the other possible values of x for which the inequality is true. Once the inequality satisfies the range \(0 < x < 1\), we have our answer.

Hope it's clear

Regards Harsh

Ok Harsh, but by the same logic haven't been able to crack the question below? Can you help?

If –1 < x < 1 and x ≠ 0, which of the following inequalities must be true? I. x3 < x II. x2 < |x| III. x4 – x5 > x3 – x2 (A) I only (B) II only (C) III only (D) II and III only (E) I, II, and III

Can we do this question algebraically without substituting fractions? By trying to prove that each of the statements given indeed have x values within the range of 0 and 1 on the number line?

Using wavy line method we know that for \(0 < x < 1\) the inequality holds true

Thus all the three inequalities are true for the range \(0 < x < 1\)

Hope it's clear

Regards Harsh

Quote:

Thanks Harsh for your reply. Can you please throw some more light on the wave method? Of what I knw, signs usually alternate but what I see in your workings, signs don't always alternate. Can you explain it? Second, why are we ignoring the negative portions say in statement 1 that makes it less than -1. It shows x values dont only pertain to 0 and 1 region. So how can stmt 1 be sufficient?

You are right when you say signs usually alternate around zero points of the inequality but they only alternate when the expression is sign dependent i.e. for odd powers. For example sign of \(x^3\) is dependent on the sign of \(x\) but sign of \(x^2\) is independent of sign of \(x\). Hence for expressions, signs of which are independent of the signs of their base variable, the wave would not alternate but rather bounce back to the same region it is currently in.

I would also suggest you to go through this post on Wavy Line method which will help you understand it better.

For your second query, in st-I the range of \(x\) for which the inequality holds is \(0 < x < 1\) or \(x < -1\) as seen from the wavy line diagram. However as the question asks us if the inequality is true for the range \(0 < x < 1\), we are not concerned about the other possible values of x for which the inequality is true. Once the inequality satisfies the range \(0 < x < 1\), we have our answer.

Hope it's clear

Regards Harsh

Ok Harsh, but by the same logic haven't been able to crack the question below? Can you help?

If –1 < x < 1 and x ≠ 0, which of the following inequalities must be true? I. x3 < x II. x2 < |x| III. x4 – x5 > x3 – x2 (A) I only (B) II only (C) III only (D) II and III only (E) I, II, and III

Re: If 0 < x < 1, which of the following inequalities must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Jun 2015, 08:25

Ok Harsh, but by the same logic haven't been able to crack the question below? Can you help?

If –1 < x < 1 and x ≠ 0, which of the following inequalities must be true? I. x3 < x II. x2 < |x| III. x4 – x5 > x3 – x2 (A) I only (B) II only (C) III only (D) II and III only (E) I, II, and III[/quote]

Please refer to this post where Japinder has presented the algebraic approach using the wavy line method.

Request you to go through it and let us know if you have trouble at any point of the solution

Regards Harsh[/quote]

Hey Harsh

Saw Japinder's solution and posted some concerns. Haven't managed a reply yet. Pls find below my comments.

Japinder two concerns: 1. why have we not flipped the inequality sign for stmt 2 when changing the sign to negative? 2. for stmt 3, we have x values less than 1 till negative infinity. how can this be sufficient as the range we want it to be is from -1 to +1

Ok Harsh, but by the same logic haven't been able to crack the question below? Can you help?

If –1 < x < 1 and x ≠ 0, which of the following inequalities must be true? I. x3 < x II. x2 < |x| III. x4 – x5 > x3 – x2 (A) I only (B) II only (C) III only (D) II and III only (E) I, II, and III

Please refer to this post where Japinder has presented the algebraic approach using the wavy line method.

Request you to go through it and let us know if you have trouble at any point of the solution

Regards Harsh

Hey Harsh

Saw Japinder's solution and posted some concerns. Haven't managed a reply yet. Pls find below my comments.

Japinder two concerns: 1. why have we not flipped the inequality sign for stmt 2 when changing the sign to negative? 2. for stmt 3, we have x values less than 1 till negative infinity. how can this be sufficient as the range we want it to be is from -1 to +1

Re: If 0 < x < 1, which of the following inequalities must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Aug 2015, 09:23

Hi,

Please help me understand how do we derive that 0<x<1 holds true by looking at the wavy curve?

Is it because the wave crosses over in the said interval (0<x<1) ? If yes, then it doesnt matter if the area is on the positive or the negative region?

Re: If 0 < x < 1, which of the following inequalities must be [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Jan 2016, 09:41

amitdgr wrote:

If 0 < x < 1, which of the following inequalities must be true ?

I. \(x^5 < x^3\) II. \(x^4 + x^5 < x^3 + x^2\) III. \(x^4 - x^5 < x^2 - x^3\)

A. None B. I only C. II only D. I and II only E. I, II and III

I've started with I: just pick x=1/2 --> 1/32<1/8. Now look at the answer choices -which would be easier to test. As we already know "I" is correct, now, if we test III and it's correct, we don't need to test II anymore, because the only answer choice that has I and III is E. If you manipulate III as stated in many solutions here, one can see that it must be true --> Answer E (we could save some time by picking III after I)
_________________

When you’re up, your friends know who you are. When you’re down, you know who your friends are.

Share some Kudos, if my posts help you. Thank you !

After days of waiting, sharing the tension with other applicants in forums, coming up with different theories about invites patterns, and, overall, refreshing my inbox every five minutes to...

I was totally freaking out. Apparently, most of the HBS invites were already sent and I didn’t get one. However, there are still some to come out on...

In early 2012, when I was working as a biomedical researcher at the National Institutes of Health , I decided that I wanted to get an MBA and make the...