Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: Solving exponents II [#permalink]
15 Nov 2010, 14:18

1

This post received KUDOS

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

Hey guys,

This has always been a favorite problem of mine - the first time I saw it, an instructor had blanked on how to solve it and emailed me a photo from his phone asking for help. He had excused himself from a tutoring session and needed me to explain how to solve it (correctly, of course) within a few minutes, so the pressure was on!

Bunuel's explanation is perfect (as always), but when the pressure was on and I wasn't exactly thinking about factoring, I did this instead - I looked to see if there were a pattern in the subtraction at left (2 to an exponent minus 2 to another exponent, two less) that would always produce 3*something on the right. So I did:

x = 3 and x-2 = 1 2^3 - 2^1 = 8 - 2 = 6

And 6 = 3(2^1), so I had a start.

x = 4 and x-2 = 2 2^4 - 2^2 = 16 - 4 = 12

And 12 = 3(2^2), so the pattern held

x = 5 and x-2 = 3 2^5 - 2^3 = 32 - 8 = 24

And 24 = 3(2^3), and the pattern became clear... The operation at left was always producing 3*2^(x-2) as its answer, so if x-2 = 13, then x = 15.

Strategically, using small numbers to establish patterns works pretty well when huge numbers (like 3(2^13)) are in play, and when exponents are involved (exponents are essentially just repetitive multiplication, so there are bound to be some repetitive patterns involved). If you can factor like Bunuel did, that's a great way to go...but I'd recommend having the "prove patterns w/ small numers" ideology in your arsenal! _________________

Re: If 2^x - 2^(x-2) = 3*2^13, What is the value of x? [#permalink]
08 Jun 2012, 23:44

1

This post received KUDOS

This has the look of not factoring easily, so I applied some logic first.

We can rule out A,B and C (as the left hand side would all be 2^13 less a positive number (smaller than 2^13), so could never equal 3 * 2^13 (larger than 2^13)

Re: If 2^x - 2^(x-2) = 3*2^13, what is the value of x? [#permalink]
15 Jun 2014, 07:14

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________