Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: If a, b, and c are positive numbers such that a is b percent [#permalink]
20 Jul 2013, 06:15

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

3

This post was BOOKMARKED

If a, b, and c are positive numbers such that a is b percent of c, what is the value of c?

a is b percent of c --> \(a=c*\frac{b}{100}\).

(1) a is c percent of b --> \(a=b*\frac{c}{100}\). The same info. Not sufficient.

(2) b is c percent of a --> \(b=a*\frac{c}{100}\) --> \(a=\frac{100b}{c}\) --> \(\frac{100b}{c}=c*\frac{b}{100}\) --> \(b\) reduces and we get: \(c^2=100^2\) --> \(c=100\) (discard c=-100 because we are told that c is positive). Sufficient.

Re: If a, b, and c are positive numbers such that a is b percent [#permalink]
06 Oct 2014, 11:24

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

Re: If a, b, and c are positive numbers such that a is b percent [#permalink]
18 Aug 2015, 15:30

Bunuel wrote:

If a, b, and c are positive numbers such that a is b percent of c, what is the value of c?

a is b percent of c --> \(a=c*\frac{b}{100}\).

(1) a is c percent of b --> \(a=b*\frac{c}{100}\). The same info. Not sufficient.

(2) b is c percent of a --> \(b=a*\frac{c}{100}\) --> \(a=\frac{100b}{c}\) --> \(\frac{100b}{c}=c*\frac{b}{100}\) --> \(b\) reduces and we get: \(c^2=100^2\) --> \(c=100\) (discard c=-100 because we are told that c is positive). Sufficient.

Answer: B.

Hi Bunuel,

I understand why B is sufficient (as you have clearly shown) but I always thought that you need at least three equations to solve a system of equation with three variables involved (a, b, and c in this case). But it seems that we only needed two equations in this case (the one in QS and (2)) to solve for c. So does the rule about needing three equations for three variables not always hold?

If a, b, and c are positive numbers such that a is b percent [#permalink]
18 Aug 2015, 17:00

2

This post received KUDOS

torontoclub15 wrote:

Hi Bunuel,

I understand why B is sufficient (as you have clearly shown) but I always thought that you need at least three equations to solve a system of equation with three variables involved (a, b, and c in this case). But it seems that we only needed two equations in this case (the one in QS and (2)) to solve for c. So does the rule about needing three equations for three variables not always hold?

Let me try to answer your question.

You are correct to say that you need 'n' equations to solve for 'n' variables, but sometimes you might be able to solve for a particular variable by manipulating the given equations (when the number of equations < number of variables).

Example, Lets say the questions asks to find the value of 'a' and you are given the following equations:

a+b+c=100 200+b=a-c

On the first glance, you will mark that the statements are not sufficient as number of equations (=2) < number of variables (=3) but look carefully,

a+b+c=100...(1) 200+b = a-c ---> a-b-c=200....(2), adding equations (1) and (2) you get,

a=150 and hence the statements are sufficient.

Thus, in a DS question, you need to be absolutely sure that given a system of linear equations, you will not be able to eliminate n-1 variables in order to mark E. Otherwise, you will end up marking anything but E (i.e. you will be able to eliminate n-1 variables!).

Re: If a, b, and c are positive numbers such that a is b percent [#permalink]
18 Aug 2015, 18:03

Engr2012 wrote:

torontoclub15 wrote:

Hi Bunuel,

I understand why B is sufficient (as you have clearly shown) but I always thought that you need at least three equations to solve a system of equation with three variables involved (a, b, and c in this case). But it seems that we only needed two equations in this case (the one in QS and (2)) to solve for c. So does the rule about needing three equations for three variables not always hold?

Let me try to answer your question.

You are correct to say that you need 'n' equations to solve for 'n' variables, but sometimes you might be able to solve for a particular variable by manipulating the given equations (when the number of equations < number of variables).

Example, Lets say the questions asks to find the value of 'a' and you are given the following equations:

a+b+c=100 200+b=a-c

On the first glance, you will mark that the statements are not sufficient as number of equations (=2) < number of variables (=3) but look carefully,

a+b+c=100...(1) 200+b = a-c ---> a-b-c=200....(2), adding equations (1) and (2) you get,

a=300 and hence the statements are sufficient.

Thus, in a DS question, you need to be absolutely sure that given a system of linear equations, you will not be able to eliminate n-1 variables in order to mark E. Otherwise, you will end up marking anything but E (i.e. you will be able to eliminate n-1 variables!).

Hope this helps.

Excellent. Thanks for clearing that up. I had been blindly following that rule for DS questions without any further work.

If a, b, and c are positive numbers such that a is b percent [#permalink]
19 Aug 2015, 03:16

1

This post received KUDOS

torontoclub15 wrote:

Engr2012 wrote:

torontoclub15 wrote:

Hi Bunuel,

I understand why B is sufficient (as you have clearly shown) but I always thought that you need at least three equations to solve a system of equation with three variables involved (a, b, and c in this case). But it seems that we only needed two equations in this case (the one in QS and (2)) to solve for c. So does the rule about needing three equations for three variables not always hold?

Let me try to answer your question.

You are correct to say that you need 'n' equations to solve for 'n' variables, but sometimes you might be able to solve for a particular variable by manipulating the given equations (when the number of equations < number of variables).

Example, Lets say the questions asks to find the value of 'a' and you are given the following equations:

a+b+c=100 200+b=a-c

On the first glance, you will mark that the statements are not sufficient as number of equations (=2) < number of variables (=3) but look carefully,

a+b+c=100...(1) 200+b = a-c ---> a-b-c=200....(2), adding equations (1) and (2) you get,

a=300 and hence the statements are sufficient.

Thus, in a DS question, you need to be absolutely sure that given a system of linear equations, you will not be able to eliminate n-1 variables in order to mark E. Otherwise, you will end up marking anything but E (i.e. you will be able to eliminate n-1 variables!).

Hope this helps.

Excellent. Thanks for clearing that up. I had been blindly following that rule for DS questions without any further work.

I forgot to mention one additional corollary of the above discussion. Is DS questions, just because you are given n equations for n variabels DOES NOT mean that you will be able to find a unique solution. Case in point:

Let the 3 equations be:

a+b+c =100 2a+2b+2c=200 3a+3b+3c=300

Thus although you are given 3 equations in 3 variables, these 3 equations are essentially the same. Thus, you can not solve this system of equations for a unique solution. Although superficially you had the sufficient number of equations, the answer will be E. _________________

Re: If a, b, and c are positive numbers such that a is b percent [#permalink]
02 Oct 2015, 06:53

kingflo wrote:

If a, b, and c are positive numbers such that a is b percent of c, what is the value of c?

(1) a is c percent of b.

(2) b is c percent of a.

Took me a while. Will post OE later.

If a, b, and c are positive numbers such that a is b percent of c, what is the value of c? for statement 2) we get c^2 = 10000 Because c is positive , c=100 but if it were given as c is INTEGER then can we can say c = +100 or -100 and statment is insufficient. I remember Bunuel's post, where he mentioned if GMAT has given even-root then it is always positive. But if we are taking even-root of both sides then we need to consider both +ve and -ve when it is odd root then it is always visible. whereas for even roots sign is hidden Thanks

gmatclubot

Re: If a, b, and c are positive numbers such that a is b percent
[#permalink]
02 Oct 2015, 06:53

On September 6, 2015, I started my MBA journey at London Business School. I took some pictures on my way from the airport to school, and uploaded them on...

When I was growing up, I read a story about a piccolo player. A master orchestra conductor came to town and he decided to practice with the largest orchestra...

Although I have taken many lessons from Field Foundations that can be leveraged later, the lessons that will stick with me the strongest have been the emotional intelligence lessons...

Tick, tock, tick...the countdown to January 7, 2016 when orientation week kicks off. Been a tiring but rewarding journey so far and I really can’t wait to...