Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 01:02 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 01:02

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Mar 2013
Posts: 36
Own Kudos [?]: 431 [164]
Given Kudos: 37
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92903
Own Kudos [?]: 618873 [88]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Sep 2014
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 34 [11]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Feb 2014
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 16 [2]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ? [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bunuel wrote:
If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?

Is \(ab > \frac{a}{b}\)? --> is \(ab - \frac{a}{b}>0\)? --> \(\frac{a(b^2-1)}{b}>0\)? --> \(\frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0\)?

(1) |b| > 1 --> both sides are non-negative, thus we can square: \(b^2>1\) --> \(b^2-1>0\). We need to know the sign of a/b. Not sufficient.

(2) ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0. We need to know the sign of b^2-1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) \(b^2-1>0\) and \(\frac{a}{b} > 0\), thus their product \(\frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.



Hi Bunell,

Can you please explain this question through plugging in. For (2) , ab>-(a/b) .. So for what values this will give yes and no and for which values after combining 1 and 2 we will get the req answer

Also wanted to add. From (2) a/b and ab has to be of the same signs . i tried plugging in values in 2. a=8,b=4 so ab=32 and a/b=2 . Similarly a=-4,b=-2 , ab=8, a/b=2 and also with a=1/8,b=8 so ab=1, a/b=1/72. So for all values ab>a/b.

Please let me knw what i am doin wrong
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92903
Own Kudos [?]: 618873 [3]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ? [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Expert Reply
Manik12345 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?

Is \(ab > \frac{a}{b}\)? --> is \(ab - \frac{a}{b}>0\)? --> \(\frac{a(b^2-1)}{b}>0\)? --> \(\frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0\)?

(1) |b| > 1 --> both sides are non-negative, thus we can square: \(b^2>1\) --> \(b^2-1>0\). We need to know the sign of a/b. Not sufficient.

(2) ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0. We need to know the sign of b^2-1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) \(b^2-1>0\) and \(\frac{a}{b} > 0\), thus their product \(\frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.



Hi Bunell,

Can you please explain this question through plugging in. For (2) , ab>-(a/b) .. So for what values this will give yes and no and for which values after combining 1 and 2 we will get the req answer

Also wanted to add. From (2) a/b and ab has to be of the same signs . i tried plugging in values in 2. a=8,b=4 so ab=32 and a/b=2 . Similarly a=-4,b=-2 , ab=8, a/b=2 and also with a=1/8,b=8 so ab=1, a/b=1/72. So for all values ab>a/b.

Please let me knw what i am doin wrong


For (2):

If a=b=1 (ab + a/b > 0), then ab = a/b. Hence in this case the answer to the question whether ab > a/b is NO.

If a=b=2 (ab + a/b > 0), then ab > a/b. Hence in this case the answer to the question whether ab > a/b is YES.

Hope it's clear.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 May 2013
Posts: 67
Own Kudos [?]: 60 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ? [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Wow! Great approach Buneul. It never occurred to me to simplify the equation in the question.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2013
Posts: 59
Own Kudos [?]: 40 [0]
Given Kudos: 67
Send PM
Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ? [#permalink]
If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?

Is ab > \frac{a}{b}? --> is ab - \frac{a}{b}>0? --> \frac{a(b^2-1)}{b}>0? --> \frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0?

(1) |b| > 1 --> both sides are non-negative, thus we can square: b^2>1 --> b^2-1>0. We need to know the sign of a/b. Not sufficient.

(2) ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0. We need to know the sign of b^2-1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) b^2-1>0 and \frac{a}{b} > 0, thus their product \frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0. Sufficient.

Hi bunuel,

I did not get the highlighted part of the solution.
Can you please explain why both a and b cannot be negative. I think if we consider values of a and b = -2 and -3 respectively. ab + a/b will remain positive overall.

Thanks in advance for your help.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92903
Own Kudos [?]: 618873 [0]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ? [#permalink]
Expert Reply
GmatDestroyer2013 wrote:
If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?

Is ab > \frac{a}{b}? --> is ab - \frac{a}{b}>0? --> \frac{a(b^2-1)}{b}>0? --> \frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0?

(1) |b| > 1 --> both sides are non-negative, thus we can square: b^2>1 --> b^2-1>0. We need to know the sign of a/b. Not sufficient.

(2) ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0. We need to know the sign of b^2-1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) b^2-1>0 and \frac{a}{b} > 0, thus their product \frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0. Sufficient.

Hi bunuel,

I did not get the highlighted part of the solution.
Can you please explain why both a and b cannot be negative. I think if we consider values of a and b = -2 and -3 respectively. ab + a/b will remain positive overall.

Thanks in advance for your help.


Both ab and a/b cannot be negative, not a and b.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Jun 2014
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 54 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ? [#permalink]
Why cant I solve the equation as ab2 > a hence b2>1 hence (a) the ans ???
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92903
Own Kudos [?]: 618873 [9]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ? [#permalink]
3
Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
ashutoshbarawkar wrote:
Why cant I solve the equation as ab2 > a hence b2>1 hence (a) the ans ???


Never multiply (or reduce) an inequality by a variable (or the expression with a variable) if you don't know its sign.

So, we can neither cross-multiply ab > a/b by b nor reduce it by a.

If b is positive, then yes we'll get ab^2 > a but if b is negative, then when multiplying by negative value we should flip the sign of the inequality and in this case we would get ab^2 < a.

The same way if a is positive, then b > 1/b but if it's negative, then b < 1/b.

Theory on Inequalities:
Solving Quadratic Inequalities - Graphic Approach: solving-quadratic-inequalities-graphic-approach-170528.html

inequalities-trick-91482.html
data-suff-inequalities-109078.html
range-for-variable-x-in-a-given-inequality-109468.html
everything-is-less-than-zero-108884.html
graphic-approach-to-problems-with-inequalities-68037.html

Tips on inequalities: inequalities-tips-and-hints-175001.html

All DS Inequalities Problems to practice: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=184
All PS Inequalities Problems to practice: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=189

700+ Inequalities problems: inequality-and-absolute-value-questions-from-my-collection-86939.html
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 43
Own Kudos [?]: 39 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Send PM
Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ? [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
ashutoshbarawkar wrote:
Why cant I solve the equation as ab2 > a hence b2>1 hence (a) the ans ???


Never multiply (or reduce) an inequality by a variable (or the expression with a variable) if you don't know its sign.

So, we can neither cross-multiply ab > a/b by b nor reduce it by a.

If b is positive, then yes we'll get ab^2 > a but if b is negative, then when multiplying by negative value we should flip the sign of the inequality and in this case we would get ab^2 < a.

The same way if a is positive, then b > 1/b but if it's negative, then b < 1/b.


Hi Bunnel, Considering the above quote, is the below approach correct?

Given that ab>a/b

Case 1: if a > 0 then b > 1/b ; true if b>1
Case 2: if a < 0 then b< 1/b ; true is b <1

State 1 says lbl >1 cant conclude anything from this

State 2 says ab + a/b > 0 so from this we know ab & a/b are both positive which means ab is positive, meaning a & b have same sign.
Cant conclude anything further

From State 1 & 2;
lbl > 1 and ab have same sign so only case 1 valid.

Thanks in advance,
Aj
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 3726
Own Kudos [?]: 16833 [1]
Given Kudos: 165
Send PM
Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ? [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
AjChakravarthy wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
ashutoshbarawkar wrote:
Why cant I solve the equation as ab2 > a hence b2>1 hence (a) the ans ???


Never multiply (or reduce) an inequality by a variable (or the expression with a variable) if you don't know its sign.

So, we can neither cross-multiply ab > a/b by b nor reduce it by a.

If b is positive, then yes we'll get ab^2 > a but if b is negative, then when multiplying by negative value we should flip the sign of the inequality and in this case we would get ab^2 < a.

The same way if a is positive, then b > 1/b but if it's negative, then b < 1/b.


Hi Bunnel, Considering the above quote, is the below approach correct?

Given that ab>a/b

Case 1: if a > 0 then b > 1/b ; true if b>1
Case 2: if a < 0 then b< 1/b ; true is b <1

State 1 says lbl >1 cant conclude anything from this

State 2 says ab + a/b > 0 so from this we know ab & a/b are both positive which means ab is positive, meaning a & b have same sign.
Cant conclude anything further

From State 1 & 2;
lbl > 1 and ab have same sign so only case 1 valid.

Thanks in advance,
Aj


Hi AjChakravarthy,

Few suggestions on your analysis:

Case 1: if a > 0 then b > 1/b ; true if b>1--> b > 1/b is also true when -1 < b < 0. Consider b = -0.5, in this case -0.5 > -2. Hence we can't say that b > 1/b is true for only b > 1.

Case 2: if a < 0 then b< 1/b ; true is b <1 --> b < 1/b is not true for cases when -1 < b < 0. Hence we can't say b < 1/b is true for all values of b < 1.

From State 1 & 2;
lbl > 1 and ab have same sign so only case 1 valid
-- > |b| > 1 can be written as b > 1 if b is +ve or -b > 1 if b is -ve. This can be simplified to b > 1 or b < -1. Hence |b| > 1 can't be inferred as b being always positive.

Hope its clear!

Regards
Harsh
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Jul 2015
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 102
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V28
Send PM
Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ? [#permalink]
Despite reading the question and explanation again and again I still can't understand " ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0."

Bunuel could you please help? :(
SVP
SVP
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2362
Own Kudos [?]: 3626 [2]
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Send PM
Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ? [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
akirah wrote:
Despite reading the question and explanation again and again I still can't understand " ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0."

Bunuel could you please help? :(


Let me try to explain.

When you are given that ab+a/b > 0 ---> \(a* \frac{b^2+1}{b} >0\) , now realise that \(b^2+1\) is ALWAYS > 0 for all values of b and thus for making \(a* \frac{b^2+1}{b} >0\) you only need to worry about a/b > 0

Once you see that the given statement 2 is reduced to a/b > 0 ---> this can only mean that both a and b have the SAME signs. Either both are <0 or both are >0. You can also see it this way:

when a/b >0--> consider 4 cases:

a>0 and b>0 ---> YES for a/b >0
a>0 and b<0 ---> NO for a/b >0
a<0 and b>0 ---> NO for a/b >0
a<0 and b<0 ---> YES for a/b >0

Thus, you get "YES" only when both a and b are of the SAME sign.

You do not have to worry about the actual sign of a or b as shown below:

Once you see that statements need to be combined, you see that the original equation is ab > a/b ? ---> ab-a/b >0 ---> a(b-1/b) > 0 ---> \(\frac{a*(b^2-1)}{b} > 0\)

---> \(\frac{a*(b+1)(b-1)}{b} > 0\), this is ONLY dependent on the sign of (b+1)(b-1) as a/b will ALWAYS be positive for all values of a and b (as both a and b are of the SAME sign).

Statement 1 mentions that |b| >1 --> b>1 or b<-1 , for these ranges, (b+1)(b-1) is > 0 ALWAYS and hence you get a definite "YES", making C as the correct answer.

Hope this helps.
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 10161
Own Kudos [?]: 16594 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Send PM
Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ? [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?

(1) |b| > 1

(2) ab + a/b > 0

Modify the original condition and the question and multiply b^2 on the both equations, which becomes ab^3>ab? --> ab^3-ab>0? -->ab(b^2-1)>0?. There are 2 variables(a,b), which should match with the number of equations. So you need 2 equations. For 1) 1 equation, for 2) 1 equation, which is likely to make C the answer.
When 1) &2), |b|>1 -> b^2>1, ab and a/b get to have the same sign in 2). That is, ab>0 -> a/b>0(this is divided by b^2 and as b^2 is a positive number, direction of the sign doesn’t change.) So, 2) becomes ab>0, which is yes and sufficient. Therefore, the answer is C.


 For cases where we need 2 more equations, such as original conditions with “2 variables”, or “3 variables and 1 equation”, or “4 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 70% chance that C is the answer, while E has 25% chance. These two are the majority. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since C is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, D or E.
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1174
Own Kudos [?]: 20709 [0]
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Send PM
Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ? [#permalink]
gmatquant25 wrote:
If \(ab ≠ 0\), is \(ab > \frac{a}{b}\)?

(1) \(|b| > 1\)

(2) \(ab + \frac{a}{b} > 0\)


Solution from "Thursdays With Ron"
Attachments

Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg [ 181.2 KiB | Viewed 6534 times ]

Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Feb 2018
Posts: 95
Own Kudos [?]: 27 [0]
Given Kudos: 90
Location: India
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
Send PM
Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ? [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
GmatDestroyer2013 wrote:
If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?

Is ab > \frac{a}{b}? --> is ab - \frac{a}{b}>0? --> \frac{a(b^2-1)}{b}>0? --> \frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0?

(1) |b| > 1 --> both sides are non-negative, thus we can square: b^2>1 --> b^2-1>0. We need to know the sign of a/b. Not sufficient.

(2) ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0. We need to know the sign of b^2-1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) b^2-1>0 and \frac{a}{b} > 0, thus their product \frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0. Sufficient.

Hi bunuel,

I did not get the highlighted part of the solution.
Can you please explain why both a and b cannot be negative. I think if we consider values of a and b = -2 and -3 respectively. ab + a/b will remain positive overall.

Thanks in advance for your help.


Both ab and a/b cannot be negative, not a and b.


Bunuel
Can you please explain the highlighted part in detail. From my understanding, even if both a and b are -ve, the answer option would be C. THanks!
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92903
Own Kudos [?]: 618873 [0]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ? [#permalink]
Expert Reply
GittinGud wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
GmatDestroyer2013 wrote:
If ab ≠ 0, is ab > a/b ?

Is ab > \frac{a}{b}? --> is ab - \frac{a}{b}>0? --> \frac{a(b^2-1)}{b}>0? --> \frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0?

(1) |b| > 1 --> both sides are non-negative, thus we can square: b^2>1 --> b^2-1>0. We need to know the sign of a/b. Not sufficient.

(2) ab + a/b > 0. Notice that ab and a/b have the same sign. Both of them cannot be negative, because in this case their sum would also be negative, therefore both are positive: a/b > 0. We need to know the sign of b^2-1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) b^2-1>0 and \frac{a}{b} > 0, thus their product \frac{a}{b}*(b^2-1)>0. Sufficient.

Hi bunuel,

I did not get the highlighted part of the solution.
Can you please explain why both a and b cannot be negative. I think if we consider values of a and b = -2 and -3 respectively. ab + a/b will remain positive overall.

Thanks in advance for your help.


Both ab and a/b cannot be negative, not a and b.


Bunuel
Can you please explain the highlighted part in detail. From my understanding, even if both a and b are -ve, the answer option would be C. THanks!


The point is that ab and a/b will have the same sign: either both are positive or both are negative. But if ab and a/b are negative, then their sum will also be negative, thus ab + a/b > 0 means that ab and a/b are both positive.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32662
Own Kudos [?]: 821 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: If ab 0, is ab > a/b ? [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: If ab 0, is ab > a/b ? [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92901 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne