Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: Tough Fraction/Algebra Question - Find possible value for n [#permalink]
30 Nov 2010, 22:34

5

This post received KUDOS

just cross multiply, we get (60-2n)b = (n-15)c now, as given, c<b ==> b/c > 1 ==> b/c = (n-15) / (60-2n) > 1

case 1: 60-2n < 0 (negative) ==> 60<2n ==> n>30 ==> from (n-15) / (60-2n) > 1 we can write (n-15) < (60-2n) as 60-2n is negative the sign changes ==> 3n<75 ==> n<25 and n>30 as derived above and this is not posible hence 60-2n is not negative

case2: 60-2n>0 positive ==> 60>2n ==> n< 30 ==> from (n-15) / (60-2n) > 1 we can write (n-15) > (60-2n) as 60-2n is positive the sign DOES NOT change ==> 3n>75 ==> n>25 and n<30 as derived above and this says n is between 25 and 30

Re: Tough Fraction/Algebra Question - Find possible value for n [#permalink]
30 Nov 2010, 22:47

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

martie11 wrote:

Source: Knewton

Solution to follow. Good luck.

You are basically given that: \(15 (\frac{4b+c}{2b+c}) = 15 (1 + \frac{2b}{2b+c}) = n\) and \(c < b\)

Thus, the largest value of the denominator should be lesser than the case where c= b. Then \(\frac{2b}{2b+c} > \frac{2b}{3b}\) which is \(\frac{2}{3}\)

Thus, \(n > 15 (1 + \frac{2}{3})\) which means \(n > 15 (\frac{5}{3}\) and hence n > 25.

The largest value to this occurs when c = 0, and if you substitute that in to the original equation, we get \(\frac{2b}{2b+c} < \frac{2b}{2b}\) which is 1. Thus \(n < (15)(2)\) which means n < 30.

The only value of n which falls in this range is 27 and hence the answer is C.

Re: Tough Fraction/Algebra Question - Find possible value for n [#permalink]
01 Dec 2010, 19:15

3

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

martie11 wrote:

Source: Knewton

Solution to follow. Good luck.

Exactly like question no 148 of OG12. Just values are different.

This question can be easily solved using weighted averages, if you are comfortable with the concept.

Note here that the question is \(\frac{{15 *c + 30*2b }}{{c + 2b}} = n\)

The formula of weighted averages looks like this: \(\frac{{ax + by}}{{x + y}} =\)Weighted Average

So n will be more than 15 but less than 30 and will depend on the relation between c and b. Since c < b, then c:2b is less than 1:2 Then weighted average (n) will lie between 25 and 30. Only possible answer is 27. Note: You cannot find the exact value of n here. Just the range in which it lies. _________________

Re: Tough Fraction/Algebra Question - Find possible value for n [#permalink]
13 Dec 2012, 03:14

1

This post received KUDOS

The values in the answer choices are quite close so it's certain that if I plug in, the resulting value will be very near one of the options. It's a rigid range.

Re: Tough Fraction/Algebra Question - Find possible value for n [#permalink]
15 Dec 2012, 20:49

VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:

martie11 wrote:

Source: Knewton

Solution to follow. Good luck.

Exactly like question no 148 of OG12. Just values are different.

This question can be easily solved using weighted averages, if you are comfortable with the concept.

Note here that the question is \(\frac{{15 *c + 30*2b }}{{c + 2b}} = n\)

The formula of weighted averages looks like this: \(\frac{{ax + by}}{{x + y}} =\)Weighted Average

So n will be more than 15 but less than 30 and will depend on the relation between c and b. Since c < b, then c:2b is less than 1:2 Then weighted average (n) will lie between 25 and 30. Only possible answer is 27. Note: You cannot find the exact value of n here. Just the range in which it lies.

Hey Karishma... I have a question.... I saw the explanation on your blog but still it did not clear... when taking weighted averages.... when a<b, the weighted average will be to the right of midpoint of the weights right..... in this case... we are taking weighted averages of c, 2b..... since c<b c is also less than 2b..... so the weighted average of c, 2b is closer to 2b.... weights are 15,30 and midpoint is 22.5... so it should be in the range of 22.5 to 30... then how did you conclude n to be between 25 and 30 instead of 22.5? I agree with your answer and was able to work it out conventional way but looking for some time saving tricks.... Thanks

Re: If b, c, and n are positive numbers such that 30(2b/(c+2b)) [#permalink]
16 Dec 2012, 03:02

Ans: solving the equation we get n= 15(c+4b)/(c+2b) the max value will occur when c =0 which is 30 and the min value will occur when c=b which is >25 , therefore the answer is (C). _________________

Re: Tough Fraction/Algebra Question - Find possible value for n [#permalink]
16 Dec 2012, 03:17

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

Amateur wrote:

Hey Karishma... I have a question.... I saw the explanation on your blog but still it did not clear... when taking weighted averages.... when a<b, the weighted average will be to the right of midpoint of the weights right..... in this case... we are taking weighted averages of c, 2b..... since c<b c is also less than 2b..... so the weighted average of c, 2b is closer to 2b.... weights are 15,30 and midpoint is 22.5... so it should be in the range of 22.5 to 30... then how did you conclude n to be between 25 and 30 instead of 22.5? I agree with your answer and was able to work it out conventional way but looking for some time saving tricks.... Thanks

Average of two numbers lies at their mid point. Weighted average of two numbers lies closer to the number which has higher weight. The average of 15 and 30 will be 22.5 The weighted average of 15 and 30 where w1 and w2 are the weights of 15 and 30 respectively will depend on the values of w1 and w2.

w1/w2 = c/2b c/b < 1 (because c < b) so c/2b < 1/2

If c/2b were equal to 1/2, w1/w2 = 1/2 so the average would be at 25. (Plug it in the formula if you are not sure how we arrived at 25). But since c/2b is actually less than 1/2, the weighted average will fall between 25 and 30. _________________

Hello everyone! Researching, networking, and understanding the “feel” for a school are all part of the essential journey to a top MBA. Wouldn’t it be great... ...

As part of our focus on MBA applications next week, which includes a live QA for readers on Thursday with admissions expert Chioma Isiadinso, we asked our bloggers to...