Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: geometry triangles [#permalink]
06 Nov 2009, 05:27

1) Is insufficient - This length doesn't help us except to tell us that BCD is not a right isosceles triangle. 2) x = 60. This means that Angle BCD = 180-60 =120. The remaining angle CBD = 180-120-30 = 30. This tells us that the triangle is isosceles. BC = CD = 6.

Re: geometry triangles [#permalink]
06 Nov 2009, 06:03

2

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

3

This post was BOOKMARKED

tejal777 wrote:

Nope..that's what I thought too!!please try again..

If CD = 6, what is the length of BC?

As it's a DS question no need to actually find the value of BC, rather than to determine that it's possible to find it with either of statements:

(1) \(BD=6\sqrt{3}\). We know CD, BD and the angle between them. The opposite side BC is fixed and has single value, meaning that you cannot draw two or more triangles with given two sides and the angle between them. Sufficient.

(2) \(x=60\). Again we know x, hence we know all the angles in triangle BCD, plus we know one of the sides CD=6, again only one such triangle exists, hence the length of BC can be determined. Sufficient.

Re: geometry triangles [#permalink]
06 Nov 2009, 09:55

1

This post received KUDOS

Draw BE perpendicular to AD, let \(CE = y\).

stmt1: \(sin30 = BE/BD\), BD is known, so BE can be found as sin30 =1/2. \(cos30 = DE/BD\), \(\sqrt{3}/2 = (6+y)/BD\) , so y can be found. Now we know BE and CE, apply pythagoras and find BC.

stmt2: \(sin30 = BE/BD\), BD is known, so BE can be found as sin30 =1/2. Now apply \(sin60 = BE/BC\), so BC can be found.

Re: geometry triangles [#permalink]
06 Nov 2009, 14:06

Kudos to both of you. Had not thought about that.

So just for my knowledge, if we know 2 sides of a triangle, and the angle in between we can safely determine that the information is sufficient?

When answering I did think about what you guys said, but thought that we a) couldn't assume that if we have 2 fixed sides and an angle we can derive the 3rd (althgouh I know we don't need to actaully derive it) and b) that trigonometry wasn't really required knowledge for the GMAT?

Re: geometry triangles [#permalink]
06 Nov 2009, 19:26

3

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

2

This post was BOOKMARKED

yangsta8 wrote:

So just for my knowledge, if we know 2 sides of a triangle, and the angle in between we can safely determine that the information is sufficient?

This is a very good question. Well, I think everybody agrees that knowing such tips is very important for GMAT. Especially in DS as it helps to avoid time wasting by not calculating an exact numerical values.

When can we say that information given is sufficient to calculate some unknown value in triangle? Think it's the same as determining congruency. If we are given some data and we can conclude that ONLY one triangle with given measurements exists, it should mean also that with given data we can calculate anything regarding this triangle.

Determining congruency:

1. SAS (Side-Angle-Side): If two pairs of sides of two triangles are equal in length, and the included angles are equal in measurement, then the triangles are congruent.

2. SSS (Side-Side-Side): If three pairs of sides of two triangles are equal in length, then the triangles are congruent.

3. ASA (Angle-Side-Angle): If two pairs of angles of two triangles are equal in measurement, and the included sides are equal in length, then the triangles are congruent.

So, knowing SAS or ASA is sufficient to determine unknown angles or sides.

NOTE IMPORTANT EXCEPTION: The SSA condition (Side-Side-Angle) which specifies two sides and a non-included angle (also known as ASS, or Angle-Side-Side) does not always prove congruence, even when the equal angles are opposite equal sides.

Specifically, SSA does not prove congruence when the angle is acute and the opposite side is shorter than the known adjacent side but longer than the sine of the angle times the adjacent side. This is the ambiguous case. In all other cases with corresponding equalities, SSA proves congruence.

The SSA condition proves congruence if the angle is obtuse or right. In the case of the right angle (also known as the HL (Hypotenuse-Leg) condition or the RHS (Right-angle-Hypotenuse-Side) condition), we can calculate the third side and fall back on SSS.

To establish congruence, it is also necessary to check that the equal angles are opposite equal sides.

So, knowing two sides and non-included angle is NOT sufficient to calculate unknown side and angles.

Angle-Angle-Angle AAA (Angle-Angle-Angle) says nothing about the size of the two triangles and hence proves only similarity and not congruence.

So, knowing three angles is NOT sufficient to determine lengths of the sides.

In our original question we had had SAS situation with (1), and ASA situation in (2) so each alone was indeed sufficient to calculate any other unknown value in this triangle. _________________

Re: geometry triangles [#permalink]
18 Nov 2010, 08:43

From statement 1 we can know that the triangle BDC is 30-60-90 degree because cd=6 and bd =6root3 so for a 30-60-90 triangle x-xroot3-2x=6-6root3-12 so the length of BC =12 From Statement 2 I dont have asolution yet

Re: geometry triangles [#permalink]
20 Nov 2010, 05:21

tejal777 wrote:

:cry:

Using Premise 1) when BD is given,BC is given ,use cosine formula BC ^ 2 = BD ^ 2 + + CB ^ 2 - 2 CB.BC Cos 30 2) When x = 60, BCD=120 , Triangle is isoceles , CB=6 therefore D, either premise satisfies _________________

Re: If CD = 6, what is the length of BC? [#permalink]
21 Jun 2013, 10:23

1

This post received KUDOS

tejal777 wrote:

Attachment:

The attachment g2.JPG is no longer available

If CD = 6, what is the length of BC?

(1) \(BD=6\sqrt{3}\) (2) x = 60

One way to solve this would be to draw a perpendicular line from B to A to make a 90 deg triangle and then solve.

Statement 1: \(BD=6\sqrt{3}\) - Sufficient

For Triangle BAD we know <C = 30, <A = 90, so <B = 60. We now have a 30:60:90 triangle with sides in the ratio x:x\(\sqrt{3}\):2x. Knowing BD allows us to calculate the value of x = 3\(\sqrt{3}\). So AD = 9 and hence AC = 3 and BA = 3\(\sqrt{3}\).

Now for triangle BAC we know the 2 sides we can calculate BC the 3rd side. Sufficient.

Statement 2: x = 60 - Sufficient If x = 60 then <C = 120 and <B = 30. We now have an isosceles triangle with two equal sides making BC and CD equal (corresponding angles being equal) so BC = 6. Sufficient.

Attachments

triangle.jpg [ 11.95 KiB | Viewed 3044 times ]

_________________

___________________________________________ Consider +1 Kudos if my post helped

Re: If CD = 6, what is the length of BC? [#permalink]
10 Dec 2013, 12:46

If CD = 6, what is the length of BC?

(1) BD=6\sqrt{3}

We know the length of BD and CD. We also know the angle that lies between them. BC is fixed. We don't have to find the solution, just confirm that there is only one possible solution. The only way that BC's angle or length could change is if line DC were extended to the left but as the diagram states, that isn't possible because we are given it's length. Sufficient.

(2) x = 60

If x = 60 then the interior angle c = 120. Seeing as angle d = 30, angle b also = 60. The shape and side lengths of this triangle are fixed into position and cannot be changed. Given side length CD = 6 then there is only one possible answer for BC. Sufficient.

If CD = 6, what is the length of BC? [#permalink]
03 Mar 2015, 07:17

(1) we know that CD = 6, and angle CDB = 30 we can draw a perpendicular line, and get 2 right triangles (30-60-90), since the new angle CFD must be 90 degrees, we can conclude that angle C must be 60 degrees. Thus, we have CD = 6, CF = 3, and FD = 3 sqrt 3. Hm, this is interesting, 3 sqrt 3 is half of BD. That means that CF is the median of BD. Knowing FD & BF, we can calculate for BC. but that is not needed. Statement 1 Sufficient

(2) x = 60, thus we can conclude that we have an isosceles triangle, and BC = CD.

Re: If CD = 6, what is the length of BC? [#permalink]
03 Mar 2015, 08:27

1

This post received KUDOS

Hi bunnel pls correct me if my approach is wrong. Here angle D is 30

In statement 1 BD 6root3

Draw a perpendicular from Cto BD at O then angle at O 90 angle D 30 angle C 60. If CD =6 then side opposite to D 30 degree is half then CO is 3 then OD is 3root3 then OB= 3root3. Trianlge OCD are congruent OCB then BC =CD. Value of BC=6

gmatclubot

Re: If CD = 6, what is the length of BC?
[#permalink]
03 Mar 2015, 08:27

On September 6, 2015, I started my MBA journey at London Business School. I took some pictures on my way from the airport to school, and uploaded them on...

When I was growing up, I read a story about a piccolo player. A master orchestra conductor came to town and he decided to practice with the largest orchestra...

I’ll start off with a quote from another blog post I’ve written : “not all great communicators are great leaders, but all great leaders are great communicators.” Being...