Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

If d is a positive integer and f is the product of the first 30 positive integers, what is the value of d?

(1) 10^d is a factor of f --> \(k*10^d=30!\).

First we should find out how many zeros \(30!\) has, it's called trailing zeros. It can be determined by the power of \(5\) in the number \(30!\) --> \(\frac{30}{5}+\frac{30}{25}=6+1=7\) --> \(30!\) has \(7\) zeros.

\(k*10^d=n*10^7\), (where \(n\) is the product of other multiples of 30!) --> it tells us only that max possible value of \(d\) is \(7\). Not sufficient.

Side notes: 30! is some huge number with 7 trailing zeros (ending with 7 zeros). Statement (1) says that \(10^d\) is factor of this number, but \(10^d\) can be 10 (d=1) or 100 (d=2) ... or 10,000,000 (d=7). Basically \(d\) can be any integer from 1 to 7, inclusive (if \(d>7\) then \(10^d\) won't be a factor of 30! as 30! has only 7 zeros in the end). So we cannot determine single numerical value of \(d\) from this statement. Hence this statement is not sufficient.

(2) d>6 Not Sufficient.

(1)+(2) From (2) \(d>6\) and from (1) \(d_{max}=7\) --> \(d=7\).

Trailing zeros: Trailing zeros are a sequence of 0s in the decimal representation (or more generally, in any positional representation) of a number, after which no other digits follow.

125000 has 3 trailing zeros;

The number of trailing zeros in the decimal representation of n!, the factorial of a non-negative integer n, can be determined with this formula:

\(\frac{n}{5}+\frac{n}{5^2}+\frac{n}{5^3}+...+\frac{n}{5^k}\), where k must be chosen such that 5^(k+1)>n

It's more simple if you look at an example:

How many zeros are in the end (after which no other digits follow) of 32!? \(\frac{32}{5}+\frac{32}{5^2}=6+1=7\) (denominator must be less than 32, \(5^2=25\) is less)

So there are 7 zeros in the end of 32!

The formula actually counts the number of factors 5 in n!, but since there are at least as many factors 2, this is equivalent to the number of factors 10, each of which gives one more trailing zero.

Re: If d is a positive integer and f is the product of the first [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Jan 2012, 14:50

Hi Bunuel thanks - all makes sense apart from the concept of trailing zeros.

Am I right in saying this is how you said there will be 7 zero's.

30/5 + 30/25 = 6 + 1 (quotient) = 7. Where I am not clear is have you simply divided 30/25? I hope I am making myself clear, if I am not then please let me know.
_________________

Hi Bunuel thanks - all makes sense apart from the concept of trailing zeros.

Am I right in saying this is how you said there will be 7 zero's.

30/5 + 30/25 = 6 + 1 (quotient) = 7. Where I am not clear is have you simply divided 30/25? I hope I am making myself clear, if I am not then please let me know.

Yes, you take only the integer part. For example how many trailing zeros does 126! have?

Re: If d is a positive integer and f is the product of the first [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Jun 2013, 20:17

Hi. I think there is a solution without knowing the trailing zeros formula. Of course I. alone will not be enough (d= 10 or d=100 do the trick) and II. d>6 is vague. Now, to evaluate I and II together, like you know that 10 = 2*5, and 10^x = (2*5)^x = 2^x*5^x, if 10^d is a factor of f, like f = 1*2*3*4*5...*30, you need to see how many 2s and 5ves you can get. You have plenty of 2s, so lets focus on the 5ves. You actually get 7 fives between 1 and 30 (one in 5,10,15,20,30 and two in 25). So basically d could be any number between 1 and 7. Like II is "d>6", you know that d = 7.

(my 1st post, sorry for style... just trying to help, I suck at knowing formulas, although they save you time. (I learned a lot from this forum, Bunuel is my Guru!))

Re: If d is a positive integer and f is the product of the first [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jul 2014, 10:11

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: If d is a positive integer and f is the product of the first [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Apr 2015, 09:11

Bunuel wrote:

If d is a positive integer and f is the product of the first 30 positive integers, what is the value of d?

(1) 10^d is a factor of f --> \(k*10^d=30!\).

First we should find out how many zeros \(30!\) has, it's called trailing zeros. It can be determined by the power of \(5\) in the number \(30!\) --> \(\frac{30}{5}+\frac{30}{25}=6+1=7\) --> \(30!\) has \(7\) zeros.

\(k*10^d=n*10^7\), (where \(n\) is the product of other multiples of 30!) --> it tells us only that max possible value of \(d\) is \(7\). Not sufficient.

Side notes: 30! is some huge number with 7 trailing zeros (ending with 7 zeros). Statement (1) says that \(10^d\) is factor of this number, but \(10^d\) can be 10 (d=1) or 100 (d=2) ... or 10,000,000 (d=7). Basically \(d\) can be any integer from 1 to 7, inclusive (if \(d>7\) then \(10^d\) won't be a factor of 30! as 30! has only 7 zeros in the end). So we can not determine single numerical value of \(d\) from this statement. Hence this statement is not sufficient.

(2) d>6 Not Sufficient.

(1)+(2) From (2) \(d>6\) and from (1) \(d_{max}=7\) --> \(d=7\).

Answer: C.

Hope it helps.

there are not just 5 and 2 which multiplies to 10 but also 2*5.. then the number of 10's in the product can be greater than 7 isnt it?

If d is a positive integer and f is the product of the first 30 positive integers, what is the value of d?

(1) 10^d is a factor of f --> \(k*10^d=30!\).

First we should find out how many zeros \(30!\) has, it's called trailing zeros. It can be determined by the power of \(5\) in the number \(30!\) --> \(\frac{30}{5}+\frac{30}{25}=6+1=7\) --> \(30!\) has \(7\) zeros.

\(k*10^d=n*10^7\), (where \(n\) is the product of other multiples of 30!) --> it tells us only that max possible value of \(d\) is \(7\). Not sufficient.

Side notes: 30! is some huge number with 7 trailing zeros (ending with 7 zeros). Statement (1) says that \(10^d\) is factor of this number, but \(10^d\) can be 10 (d=1) or 100 (d=2) ... or 10,000,000 (d=7). Basically \(d\) can be any integer from 1 to 7, inclusive (if \(d>7\) then \(10^d\) won't be a factor of 30! as 30! has only 7 zeros in the end). So we can not determine single numerical value of \(d\) from this statement. Hence this statement is not sufficient.

(2) d>6 Not Sufficient.

(1)+(2) From (2) \(d>6\) and from (1) \(d_{max}=7\) --> \(d=7\).

Answer: C.

Hope it helps.

there are not just 5 and 2 which multiplies to 10 but also 2*5.. then the number of 10's in the product can be greater than 7 isnt it?

Re: If d is a positive integer and f is the product of the first [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Apr 2015, 20:31

in gmatprep there are many too difficult questions.

if we practice harder questions, take the questions form og or gmatprep not from prep companies. because the harder questions from prep companies are not basic. gmat is very basic.

We know that \(35\) has two factors \(5\) and \(7\) First impulse is to just take answer from previous question because of presence of \(5\) but we should calculate that number, that has less occurrences So \(5\) in \(30!\) meets \(7\) times but \(7\) in \(30!\) meets \(4\) times.

And we can infer that \(30!\) will be divisible by \(35\) only \(4\) times. So \(p = 4\)
_________________

We know that \(35\) has two factors \(5\) and \(7\) First impulse is to just take answer from previous question because of presence of \(5\) but we should calculate that number, that has less occurrences So \(5\) in \(30!\) meets \(7\) times but \(7\) in \(30!\) meets \(4\) times.

And we can infer that \(30!\) will be divisible by \(35\) only \(4\) times. So \(p = 4\)

Re: If d is a positive integer and f is the product of the first [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Dec 2015, 00:04

Bunuel : I understood the solution but what i didn't understand is ..why isn't statement 1 sufficient. We know the trailing zeros are 7and can only be 7 because it would otherwise exceed 30! ..so wouldn't A be enough to tell us that d=7.

although statement 2 says d>6 ..and if we combine them it just reconfirms the same thing. can you pls help me fill the gap in my understanding .

Bunuel : I understood the solution but what i didn't understand is ..why isn't statement 1 sufficient. We know the trailing zeros are 7and can only be 7 because it would otherwise exceed 30! ..so wouldn't A be enough to tell us that d=7.

although statement 2 says d>6 ..and if we combine them it just reconfirms the same thing. can you pls help me fill the gap in my understanding .

From (1) we only know that max possible value of d is 7.

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...