Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

If X denotes one of two arithmetic operations, addition or multiplication, and if k is an integer, what is the value of 3 X k?

1) 2 X k = 3 2) 1 X 0 = k

Got E.

X can be multiply or add. For simplicity sake, I am going to change that to @.
So, 3@k can be 3+k or 3*k.

1) 2@k = 3. Two equations here. 2+k = 3 or 2*k = 3.
Possible k are 1 or 2/3. k is an integer, so k=1.
This gives 3+1 = 4 or 3*1 = 3
Either 4 or 3, INSUFFICIENT.

2) 1@0 = k. Two equations: 1+0 = k, 1*0 = k
k can be 1 or 0
for k=1, plug in: 3+1 = 4, 3*1 =3
for k=0, plug in: 3+0 = 3, 3*0 = 0
So it can be either 4, 3, or 0
INSUFFICIENT.

I think it's A. and I'm guessing that they're trying to say that X is either multiplication or addition but it cannot be both. Since 1 shows that is HAS to be addition and k has to be 1 you can get 3 + 1 = 4

that's my guess anyway. otherwise you could never be sure.

St1:
We know k is an integer, and 2xK results in an intger, 3.So x cannot be multiplication since that would require k to be a non-integer (3/2). Thus x must be addition, and k must be 1. and 3xk = 4. Sufficient.

St2:
Insufficient. It could be 1*0 = 0 (k=0) or 1+0 = 1 (k=1).

the reason it's not e is because X can be either addition or subtraction -- but it can't be both. so a suffices because the only way 3Xk=4 is if k is 1 and X is addition. that means that for the purposes of the problem, using a X is addition --- a takes multiplication completely out of the picture. so now we're left with a or d as the possible answers. d alone certainly not sufficient - so it has to be a.

Since K is an integer and X is either addition or multiplication:

1) Stmt 1 can only imply addition since 2 + 1 = 3 (1 being K)
and if we use multiplication, the answer would not be an integer: 2 * 1.5 = 3. We can now solve for 3 X k, since we know which operation X is.
SUFFICIENT

2) Stmt 2 both addition and multiplication is true in this case 1 + 0 = 1 (K) and 1 * 0 = 0 (K) since both generates an integer we cannot solve for 3 X K.
thus INSUFFICIENT

As for the solution: If @ denotes one of two arithmetic operations, addition or multiplication, and if k is an integer, what is the value of 3 @ k?

(1) 2 @ k = 3 --> @ can only by addition because if it's multiplication then 2*k=3 -- k=3/2, which is not an integer as stated in the stem. So, we have 2+k=3 --> k=1 --> 3@k=3+1=4. Sufficient.

(2) 1 @ 0 = k --> @ can be both addition and multiplication, since 1+0=1=k=integer and 1*0=0=k=integer, so we also have two values of k: 1 and 0. In this case 3@k=3+1=4 or 3@k=3*0=0, two different answers. Not sufficient.

Re: If X denotes one of two arithmetic operations, addition or [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Mar 2012, 15:24

Bunuel wrote:

bschoolnewbie2011 wrote:

I think this question is worded extremely poorly.

As for the solution: If @ denotes one of two arithmetic operations, addition or multiplication, and if k is an integer, what is the value of 3 @ k?

(1) 2 @ k = 3 --> @ can only by addition because if it's multiplication then 2*k=3 -- k=3/2, which is not an integer as stated in the stem. So, we have 2+k=3 --> k=1 --> 3@k=3+1=4. Sufficient.

(2) 1 @ 0 = k --> @ can be both addition and multiplication, since 1+0=1=k=integer and 1*0=0=k=integer, so we also have two values of k: 1 and 0. In this case 3@k=3+1=4 or 3@k=3*0=0, two different answers. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it helps.

I understand the answer behind it. I did everything you did. I still picked E because it did not say that symbols in different equations had to be the same. Yes you are able to know what k is, but that doesn't mean you know what the answer to the equation is because the operation could be either.

This question did not test mathematics in my opinion, but rather an obscure interpretation of a poorly worded question.

As for the solution: If @ denotes one of two arithmetic operations, addition or multiplication, and if k is an integer, what is the value of 3 @ k?

(1) 2 @ k = 3 --> @ can only by addition because if it's multiplication then 2*k=3 -- k=3/2, which is not an integer as stated in the stem. So, we have 2+k=3 --> k=1 --> 3@k=3+1=4. Sufficient.

(2) 1 @ 0 = k --> @ can be both addition and multiplication, since 1+0=1=k=integer and 1*0=0=k=integer, so we also have two values of k: 1 and 0. In this case 3@k=3+1=4 or 3@k=3*0=0, two different answers. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it helps.

I understand the answer behind it. I did everything you did. I still picked E because it did not say that symbols in different equations had to be the same. Yes you are able to know what k is, but that doesn't mean you know what the answer to the equation is because the operation could be either.

This question did not test mathematics in my opinion, but rather an obscure interpretation of a poorly worded question.

First of all it's a GMAT Prep question, so it's a GMAT wording. If you are preparing for the GMAT it's better to get used to it.

Next, from (1) you are able to get that @ can denote ONLY addition, which gives unique value of k: 1. So, the answer to the question: "what is the value of 3@k?" is 4 since 3+1=4.

Re: If @ denotes one of two arithmetic operations, addition or [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Jun 2013, 02:42

1

This post received KUDOS

leeye84 wrote:

If @ denotes one of two arithmetic operations, addition or multiplication, and if k is an integer, what is the value of 3 @ k?

(1) 2 @ k = 3

(2) 1 @ 0 = k

Here, keep in mind we need to find two values, i.e. k=? and the operator + or * ?

(1) 2 @ k = 3

k is an integer, hence, 2 + 1 seems like the obvious choice. Since, 2 * 3/2 = 3, however, k is an integer so ruled out. If k hadnt been integer, then we would have to worry a bit, but this makes things easier.

k=1 and operator = + => Sufficient.

(2) 1 @ 0 = k

We dont know the outcome which is k, so we could have either 1 + 0 = 1 or 1 * 0 = 0 We dont know. Hence insufficient => A answer
_________________

PS: Like my approach? Please Help me with some Kudos.

Re: If @ denotes one of two arithmetic operations, addition or [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Dec 2014, 08:46

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: If @ denotes one of two arithmetic operations, addition or [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Sep 2016, 01:17

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...