Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: PS - Number properties [#permalink]
28 Jan 2008, 16:50

I cant think of anything shorter. But, the way I do it is for 2/11. I make it 20/11. So the quotient will be 1.8181..Then I shift the decimal so it is 0.18

Re: PS - Number properties [#permalink]
28 Jan 2008, 18:39

gmatraider wrote:

Is there any easy way to decipher this question (i.e. how do you get the answer here without a calculator or doing long division for a while?)?

If each of the following fractions were written as a repeating decimal, which would have the longest sequence of digits?

2/11 1/3 41/99 2/3 23/37

I also waste more than 2 minutes for this. At first, I did not know what the repeating decimal, only decimal. Anyway, let call to Walker, Alo Walker, where are you? and how are you? hihi _________________

Re: PS - Number properties [#permalink]
28 Jan 2008, 22:07

3

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

E

After reading of the problem I pick E by intuition: I thought that: 1. nominators do not influence on length of sequence. (for right fraction) 2.the largest prime in denominator lead to the largest sequence).

But I did not know a general rule...

\(1/a=0.(b)=b*(10^{-n}+10^{-2n}+10^{-3n.....}+...)=b*\frac{10^{-n}}{1-10^{-n}}=b*\frac{1}{10^{n}-1}=\frac{b}{99...99_n}\) where n - the length of sequence (the number of digits of b)

Therefore, \(a\) have to be a factor of \(99...9_n\)

1. n=1, 9: B,D out, because of 9=3*k 2. n=2, 99: A,C out, because of 99=11*k=99*k

E remains. It took about 2 min but I think we have now a good rule

Check:

2/11=0.(18) n=2. ok 1/3=0.(3) n=1. ok 41/99=0.(41) n=2. ok 1/3=0.(6) n=1. ok 23/37=0.(621) n=3. 999=27*37. ok _________________

Re: PS - Number properties [#permalink]
29 Jan 2008, 00:01

walker wrote:

E

After reading of the problem I pick E by intuition: I thought that: 1. nominators do not influence on length of sequence. (for right fraction) 2.the largest prime in denominator lead to the largest sequence).

But I did not know a general rule...

\(1/a=0.(b)=b*(10^{-n}+10^{-2n}+10^{-3n.....}+...)=b*\frac{10^{-n}}{1-10^{-n}}=b*\frac{1}{10^{n}-1}=\frac{b}{99...99_n}\) where n - the length of sequence (the number of digits of b)

Therefore, \(a\) have to be a factor of \(99...9_n\)

1. n=1, 9: B,D out, because of 9=3*k 2. n=2, 99: A,C out, because of 99=11*k=99*k

E remains. It took about 2 min but I think we have now a good rule

Check:

2/11=0.(18) n=2. ok 1/3=0.(3) n=1. ok 41/99=0.(41) n=2. ok 1/3=0.(6) n=1. ok 23/37=0.(621) n=3. 999=27*37. ok

I got it, Walker!

Let apply it, if something wrong, please correct me! -do not care about nominator -ignore the denominator as not prime because the largest prime in denominator, the largest sequence -[Most important] is to check what denominator as prime biggest? right?

Walker, you are deserved to be 51 in Q! Many thanks _________________

Re: PS - Number properties [#permalink]
29 Jan 2008, 01:27

Expert's post

walker wrote:

After reading of the problem I pick E by intuition: I thought that: 1. nominators do not influence on length of sequence. (for right fraction) - it is true 2.the largest prime in denominator lead to the largest sequence). - it is false

I think a fast way for such problem is:

1. Test for right fractions. 2. Exclude nominators 3. Exclude 2 and 5 from a denominators. 4. 3,9 - n=1, 3,11,33,99 - n=2 5. POI 6. find 1/denominator for remained variants.

Re: PS - Number properties [#permalink]
29 Jan 2008, 01:55

walker wrote:

walker wrote:

After reading of the problem I pick E by intuition: I thought that: 1. nominators do not influence on length of sequence. (for right fraction) - it is true 2.the largest prime in denominator lead to the largest sequence). - it is false

I think a fast way for such problem is:

1. Test for right fractions. 2. Exclude nominators 3. Exclude 2 and 5 from a denominators. 4. 3,9 - n=1, 3,11,33,99 - n=2 5. POI= what abbreviation? 6. find 1/denominator for remained variants. Please do not tell me that I must do a calculation!

Re: PS - Number properties [#permalink]
29 Jan 2008, 02:14

Ur basic calculations shiould be strong enough.keep all the basic divisions on ur tips to deal with any big calculations. Eg.3/22 could be calculated as simple as it is done here. 1/11=0.0909.. 3/11 is trice this i.e 0.272727... 0272727..../2 gives u the requiered value..

Re: PS - Number properties [#permalink]
29 Jan 2008, 02:16

Expert's post

Sorry, P.O.E. (process of elimination) at 6. You may have some options that did not eliminated by previous steps: for example, 1/7 or 1/37. _________________

Re: PS - Number properties [#permalink]
29 Jan 2008, 02:22

Expert's post

Pzazz wrote:

Ur basic calculations shiould be strong enough.keep all the basic divisions on ur tips to deal with any big calculations. Eg.3/22 could be calculated as simple as it is done here. 1/11=0.0909.. 3/11 is trice this i.e 0.272727... 0272727..../2 gives u the requiered value..

You are right. I think it is better to have 2-3 ways to solve the problem. You always can choose the most clearest and fastest way that is appropriate for you. _________________

Re: PS - Number properties [#permalink]
29 Jan 2008, 12:11

gmatraider wrote:

Is there any easy way to decipher this question (i.e. how do you get the answer here without a calculator or doing long division for a while?)?

If each of the following fractions were written as a repeating decimal, which would have the longest sequence of digits?

2/11 1/3 41/99 2/3 23/37

Well I dunno a fast approach other than long division. But you can easily elim B and D b/c they are essentially the same type of repeating decimal.

2/11 --> .1818 41/99 --> .414141 etc...

23/37 --> .621 winner. E it is.

You dont have to go all the way w/ long division here Ex/ 37)23 --> 37)230 --> 6*37 230-222 --> 8 37 goes into 80 twice so 80-74 =6 You should realize here that you will have a different number so this is the answer.

You can apply this approach to the other two as well.

If each of the following fractions were written as a repeating decimal, which would have the longest sequence of different digits? 2/11 1/3 41/99 2/3 23/37 I am marching thru the OG, this is simple, but just wonder anyone got better trick for repeating decimal (hmm obviously if we play division game for A, B, D we can find; but i try to optimize calculation time )

I remember in one post Walker had some nice explaination about the terminating and repeating fraction.

He said that "1/17 has how many repeating numbers? (p-1) = 16 numbers". So I think E is my choice because E will have 37-1 =36 repeating digits?

Correct me if I wrong you and Walker _________________

1. reduce fraction if it is possible. Here we have all proper fractions. 2. because numerator does not influence on period of sequence, set all numerators to 1: 1/11, 1/3, 1/99, 1/3, 1/37 3. transform all fraction to the denominator such as 9, 99, 999 .....: 9/99, 3/9, 1/99, 3/9, 1/37 4. 1/37 we cannot write out as a fraction with denominator of 9 or 99. (actually we can with 999 but this is not necessary here) So, E is a winner. _________________

I remember in one post Walker had some nice explaination about the terminating and repeating fraction.

He said that "1/17 has how many repeating numbers? (p-1) = 16 numbers". So I think E is my choice because E will have 37-1 =36 repeating digits?

Correct me if I wrong you and Walker

I remember that I even proved rule with 99....999 by means of geometrical progression.... But it say that we should count 9 in 99...999 denominator. _________________

nice to see the 9 rule, is it some fundamental property of arithmetic? thanks sodenso i don't think the rule works with 1/37 (only 3 repeated numbers) ...

Re: PS - repeating decimal [#permalink]
01 May 2008, 04:32

AlbertNTN wrote:

If each of the following fractions were written as a repeating decimal, which would have the longest sequence of different digits? 2/11 1/3 41/99 2/3 23/37 I am marching thru the OG, this is simple, but just wonder anyone got better trick for repeating decimal (hmm obviously if we play division game for A, B, D we can find; but i try to optimize calculation time )

I did this in my head in bout 2 min. its not really that bad. B,D elim right off the bat.

A. just solve out, you get .1818 C again just solve out you get .4141

I was wondering if there are any tips or tricks to save time in questions like these rather than manually calculating values. I know one trick which is used to check the greater values in fractions

For e.g to check which one greater among say 2/3 , 3/16 and 7/ 48

Just multiply the denominator one fraction to other numerator i.e 2 x 16 and 3 x 3. here 2x16 is greater hence the 2/3 is greater than 3/16.

Folks please share if you know tips and tricks to save time while doing these cheesy time consuming calculations.

Re: Tips and Tricks [#permalink]
28 Jul 2009, 12:16

11

This post received KUDOS

5

This post was BOOKMARKED

I have taken 15 seconds to resolve this problem! For this problem specifically, there are some very fast tricks that you can do remembering the properties of recurring decimals. You just need a little patience to understand a first time. Then you probably will never forget.

Here is a brief description useful in a some GMAT exercises:

First - We use the number that is repeating and the denominator has as many "9" digits as there are different digits in the block that repeats. e.g. \(0.555555 = 5/9\) \(0.13131313 = 13/99\) \(0.432432432432 = 432/999\)

Second - If the sequence starts to repeat after some zeros, add the same number of zeros in the denominator. e.g. \(0.005555 = 5/900\) \(0.013131313 = 13/990\) \(0.0004324324324... = 432/999000 = 54/124875 = 2/4625\)

Last one - The reciprocal of a prime number "p", except 2 and 5, has a repeating sequence of p-1 digits, or a factor of p-1 digits. e.g. \(1/7 = 0.142857 142857 142857...\) - As you can notice, the sequence has 6 digits = p-1 = 7-1 = 6 digits. And if you multiply this fraction by a number you will only change the beginning of the sequence. e.g. \(4/7 = 4*1/7 = 0.57 142857 142857 ...\)

**************** Once you have all these little rules in mind it is very fast to work in this problem. A) 2/11 -> 11 is a factor of 99, so there are 2 repeating digits. B) 1/3 -> 3 is a factor of 9, so there is 1 repeating digit. C) 41/99 -> 99, so there are 2 repeating digits. D) 2/3 -> 3 is a factor of 9, so there is 1 repeating digit.. E) 23/37 -> As I still don't have one item that is winning in repeating digits, this must be CORRECT

\(E\)

Good studies!

If you enjoyed the post, please consider a kudo!!! I need to practice my verbal skills in the GMATClub tests

Last edited by coelholds on 28 Jul 2009, 13:55, edited 2 times in total.

I am not panicking. Nope, Not at all. But I am beginning to wonder what I was thinking when I decided to work full-time and plan my cross-continent relocation...

Over the last week my Facebook wall has been flooded with most positive, almost euphoric emotions: “End of a fantastic school year”, “What a life-changing year it’s been”, “My...