Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

"Appreciation is a wonderful thing. It makes what is excellent in others belong to us as well." ― Voltaire Press Kudos, if I have helped. Thanks! shit-happens-my-journey-to-172475.html#p1372807

OA. C OE: Statement (1) means that X or Y can take on the values 5, 7, 8, 9 each of which can be made by adding two distinct single digit prime numbers. Now, plug in to evaluate the statement. If XY = 75, then the answer to the question is no. However, if XY = 59, then the answer to the question is yes. The correct answer must be B, C or E. Statement (2) is also insufficient. If XY = 88, the answer is no but if XY = 79, the answer is yes. Cross off B. If the statements are combined, then only two numbers, 79 and 97, satisfy both conditions and both are prime. The correct answer is C.

I choose B. It is given X and Y are different, so XY=88 in second case is not possible.

You are right, answer must be B:

(2) The sum of digits X and Y is 16. There are only three such two-digit numbers possible: 79, 97 and 88, but since we are told that X and Y are distinct then 88 is out and we are left with two prime numbers - 79 and 97.

Re: If each of the two digits X and Y is distinct [#permalink]
31 Aug 2012, 07:23

Bunuel wrote:

OE: Statement (1) means that X or Y can take on the values 5, 7, 8, 9 each of which can be made by adding two distinct single digit prime numbers. Now, plug in to evaluate the statement. If XY = 75, then the answer to the question is no. However, if XY = 59, then the answer to the question is yes. The correct answer must be B, C or E. Statement (2) is also insufficient. If XY = 88, the answer is no but if XY = 79, the answer is yes. Cross off B. If the statements are combined, then only two numbers, 79 and 97, satisfy both conditions and both are prime. The correct answer is C.

I choose B. It is given X and Y are different, so XY=88 in second case is not possible.[/spoiler]

Hi Bunuel/Ahmed, could you please explain again as I'm getting a definite "no" from (1) and a "yes" from (2), which is not possible of course: (1)The option XY = 75 can not exist, note it says that X & Y are both the sum of distinct prime numbers, so X and Y must each be one of the following options -> 4 (1+3), 6 (1+5), 8 (1+7 OR 5+3). So that gives only even XY options which can not be prime.

Thus (1) is a definite "NO", so its either A or D (2) X+Y=16, so as you mentioned its 88, 79, 97 - 88 goes out as its not distinct for X & Y, so YES as they're both prime.

Not sure what I'm doing wrong here. Would appreciate your clarification!

_________________

How to improve your RC score, pls Kudo if helpful! http://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-improve-my-rc-accuracy-117195.html Work experience (as of June 2012) 2.5 yrs (Currently employed) - Mckinsey & Co. (US Healthcare Analyst) 2 yrs - Advertising industry (client servicing)

Re: If each of the two digits X and Y is distinct [#permalink]
31 Aug 2012, 07:39

Expert's post

Aximili85 wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

OE: Statement (1) means that X or Y can take on the values 5, 7, 8, 9 each of which can be made by adding two distinct single digit prime numbers. Now, plug in to evaluate the statement. If XY = 75, then the answer to the question is no. However, if XY = 59, then the answer to the question is yes. The correct answer must be B, C or E. Statement (2) is also insufficient. If XY = 88, the answer is no but if XY = 79, the answer is yes. Cross off B. If the statements are combined, then only two numbers, 79 and 97, satisfy both conditions and both are prime. The correct answer is C.

I choose B. It is given X and Y are different, so XY=88 in second case is not possible.[/spoiler]

Hi Bunuel/Ahmed, could you please explain again as I'm getting a definite "no" from (1) and a "yes" from (2), which is not possible of course: (1)The option XY = 75 can not exist, note it says that X & Y are both the sum of distinct prime numbers, so X and Y must each be one of the following options -> 4 (1+3), 6 (1+5), 8 (1+7 OR 5+3). So that gives only even XY options which can not be prime.

Thus (1) is a definite "NO", so its either A or D (2) X+Y=16, so as you mentioned its 88, 79, 97 - 88 goes out as its not distinct for X & Y, so YES as they're both prime.

Not sure what I'm doing wrong here. Would appreciate your clarification!

1 is not a prime number. Single digit primes are: 2, 3, 5, and 7. So, x and y could be: 2+3=5, 2+5=7, 2+7=9, 3+5=8 --> xy could be: 57, 75, 58, 85, 59, 95, 78, 87, 79, 97, 89 and 98. Some numbers are prime (for example 79) and some are not (for example 75).

Re: If each of the two digits X and Y is distinct [#permalink]
03 Sep 2012, 01:45

Hi Bunuel,

I have a question here: I agree that the 2nd statement leads to 79, 97 and 88. While the 1st statement states that each of the digits in X and Y need to be single digit prime numbers, can we definitively conclude, using the 2nd statement, that 79 or 97 is a prime number? Since 9 is not a prime number, can both statements contradict or am I missing something here?

Re: If each of the two digits X and Y is distinct [#permalink]
03 Sep 2012, 01:50

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

nutshell wrote:

Hi Bunuel,

I have a question here: I agree that the 2nd statement leads to 79, 97 and 88. While the 1st statement states that each of the digits in X and Y need to be single digit prime numbers, can we definitively conclude, using the 2nd statement, that 79 or 97 is a prime number? Since 9 is not a prime number, can both statements contradict or am I missing something here?

(1) doesn't say that X and Y must be primes, it says that "each of the digits X and Y is the sum of 2 distinct single digit prime numbers". So, x and y could be: 2+3=5, 2+5=7, 2+7=9, or 3+5=8.