Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

OA. C OE: Statement (1) means that X or Y can take on the values 5, 7, 8, 9 each of which can be made by adding two distinct single digit prime numbers. Now, plug in to evaluate the statement. If XY = 75, then the answer to the question is no. However, if XY = 59, then the answer to the question is yes. The correct answer must be B, C or E. Statement (2) is also insufficient. If XY = 88, the answer is no but if XY = 79, the answer is yes. Cross off B. If the statements are combined, then only two numbers, 79 and 97, satisfy both conditions and both are prime. The correct answer is C.

I choose B. It is given X and Y are different, so XY=88 in second case is not possible.

You are right, answer must be B:

(2) The sum of digits X and Y is 16. There are only three such two-digit numbers possible: 79, 97 and 88, but since we are told that X and Y are distinct then 88 is out and we are left with two prime numbers - 79 and 97.
_________________

Re: If each of the two digits X and Y is distinct [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Aug 2012, 07:23

Bunuel wrote:

OE: Statement (1) means that X or Y can take on the values 5, 7, 8, 9 each of which can be made by adding two distinct single digit prime numbers. Now, plug in to evaluate the statement. If XY = 75, then the answer to the question is no. However, if XY = 59, then the answer to the question is yes. The correct answer must be B, C or E. Statement (2) is also insufficient. If XY = 88, the answer is no but if XY = 79, the answer is yes. Cross off B. If the statements are combined, then only two numbers, 79 and 97, satisfy both conditions and both are prime. The correct answer is C.

I choose B. It is given X and Y are different, so XY=88 in second case is not possible.[/spoiler]

Hi Bunuel/Ahmed, could you please explain again as I'm getting a definite "no" from (1) and a "yes" from (2), which is not possible of course: (1)The option XY = 75 can not exist, note it says that X & Y are both the sum of distinct prime numbers, so X and Y must each be one of the following options -> 4 (1+3), 6 (1+5), 8 (1+7 OR 5+3). So that gives only even XY options which can not be prime.

Thus (1) is a definite "NO", so its either A or D (2) X+Y=16, so as you mentioned its 88, 79, 97 - 88 goes out as its not distinct for X & Y, so YES as they're both prime.

Not sure what I'm doing wrong here. Would appreciate your clarification!
_________________

How to improve your RC score, pls Kudo if helpful! http://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-improve-my-rc-accuracy-117195.html Work experience (as of June 2012) 2.5 yrs (Currently employed) - Mckinsey & Co. (US Healthcare Analyst) 2 yrs - Advertising industry (client servicing)

OE: Statement (1) means that X or Y can take on the values 5, 7, 8, 9 each of which can be made by adding two distinct single digit prime numbers. Now, plug in to evaluate the statement. If XY = 75, then the answer to the question is no. However, if XY = 59, then the answer to the question is yes. The correct answer must be B, C or E. Statement (2) is also insufficient. If XY = 88, the answer is no but if XY = 79, the answer is yes. Cross off B. If the statements are combined, then only two numbers, 79 and 97, satisfy both conditions and both are prime. The correct answer is C.

I choose B. It is given X and Y are different, so XY=88 in second case is not possible.[/spoiler]

Hi Bunuel/Ahmed, could you please explain again as I'm getting a definite "no" from (1) and a "yes" from (2), which is not possible of course: (1)The option XY = 75 can not exist, note it says that X & Y are both the sum of distinct prime numbers, so X and Y must each be one of the following options -> 4 (1+3), 6 (1+5), 8 (1+7 OR 5+3). So that gives only even XY options which can not be prime.

Thus (1) is a definite "NO", so its either A or D (2) X+Y=16, so as you mentioned its 88, 79, 97 - 88 goes out as its not distinct for X & Y, so YES as they're both prime.

Not sure what I'm doing wrong here. Would appreciate your clarification!

1 is not a prime number. Single digit primes are: 2, 3, 5, and 7. So, x and y could be: 2+3=5, 2+5=7, 2+7=9, 3+5=8 --> xy could be: 57, 75, 58, 85, 59, 95, 78, 87, 79, 97, 89 and 98. Some numbers are prime (for example 79) and some are not (for example 75).

Re: If each of the two digits X and Y is distinct [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Sep 2012, 01:45

Hi Bunuel,

I have a question here: I agree that the 2nd statement leads to 79, 97 and 88. While the 1st statement states that each of the digits in X and Y need to be single digit prime numbers, can we definitively conclude, using the 2nd statement, that 79 or 97 is a prime number? Since 9 is not a prime number, can both statements contradict or am I missing something here?

I have a question here: I agree that the 2nd statement leads to 79, 97 and 88. While the 1st statement states that each of the digits in X and Y need to be single digit prime numbers, can we definitively conclude, using the 2nd statement, that 79 or 97 is a prime number? Since 9 is not a prime number, can both statements contradict or am I missing something here?

(1) doesn't say that X and Y must be primes, it says that "each of the digits X and Y is the sum of 2 distinct single digit prime numbers". So, x and y could be: 2+3=5, 2+5=7, 2+7=9, or 3+5=8.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Post-MBA I became very intrigued by how senior leaders navigated their career progression. It was also at this time that I realized I learned nothing about this during my...