Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

If i and d are integers, what is the value of i? (1) The remainder when i is divided by (d+2) is the same as when i is divided by d (2) The quotient when i is divided by (d+2) is d

What is the best way to tackle this kind of DS problems?

It can be done algebraically but picking numbers would probably be faster/easier.

If i and d are integers, what is the value of i?

(1) The remainder when i is divided by (d+2) is the same as when i is divided by d --> let the remainder be 0 to simplify the case. So, we have that i is divisible by both d and d+2 --> if d=1 then d+2=3 and i can be ANY multiple of 3. Not sufficient.

(2) The quotient when i is divided by (d+2) is d --> let the remainder be 0 to simplify the case. Now, if d=2 then d+2=4, so i=8 (8/4=2: i=8 divided by d+2=4 yields the quotient of d=2) but if d=3 then d+2=5 and i=15 (15/5=3). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Notice that two values of i from (2) works for (1) as well: 8 is divisible d=2 and d+2=4 and 15 is divisible by d=3 and d+2=5.

Re: What is the best way to tackle this kind of DS problems [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 May 2014, 15:12

Bunuel wrote:

smodak wrote:

If i and d are integers, what is the value of i? (1) The remainder when i is divided by (d+2) is the same as when i is divided by d (2) The quotient when i is divided by (d+2) is d

What is the best way to tackle this kind of DS problems?

It can be done algebraically but picking numbers would probably be faster/easier.

If i and d are integers, what is the value of i?

(1) The remainder when i is divided by (d+2) is the same as when i is divided by d --> let the remainder be 0 to simplify the case. So, we have that i is divisible by both d and d+2 --> if d=1 then d+2=3 and i can be ANY multiple of 3. Not sufficient.

(2) The quotient when i is divided by (d+2) is d --> let the remainder be 0 to simplify the case. Now, if d=2 then d+2=4, so i=8 (8/4=2: i=8 divided by d+2=4 yields the quotient of d=2) but if d=3 then d+2=5 and i=15 (15/5=3). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Notice that two values of i from (2) works for (1) as well: 8 is divisible d=2 and d+2=4 and 15 is divisible by d=3 and d+2=5.

Answer: E.

Hope it's clear.

What's the trick in this question? Is it only the fact that 'd' and 'd+2' as denominators can be larger than 'i' and therefore, 'i' could take any value as long as it is smaller than the denominator as well as being a multiple of both 'd' and 'd+2' ? (Has to be a multiple otherwise remainder can't be zero)

Re: What is the best way to tackle this kind of DS problems [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 May 2014, 05:07

Bunuel wrote:

smodak wrote:

If i and d are integers, what is the value of i? (1) The remainder when i is divided by (d+2) is the same as when i is divided by d (2) The quotient when i is divided by (d+2) is d

What is the best way to tackle this kind of DS problems?

It can be done algebraically but picking numbers would probably be faster/easier.

If i and d are integers, what is the value of i?

(1) The remainder when i is divided by (d+2) is the same as when i is divided by d --> let the remainder be 0 to simplify the case. So, we have that i is divisible by both d and d+2 --> if d=1 then d+2=3 and i can be ANY multiple of 3. Not sufficient.

(2) The quotient when i is divided by (d+2) is d --> let the remainder be 0 to simplify the case. Now, if d=2 then d+2=4, so i=8 (8/4=2: i=8 divided by d+2=4 yields the quotient of d=2) but if d=3 then d+2=5 and i=15 (15/5=3). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Notice that two values of i from (2) works for (1) as well: 8 is divisible d=2 and d+2=4 and 15 is divisible by d=3 and d+2=5.

Answer: E.

Hope it's clear.

Can this somehow be done algebraically or conceptually

I had that first i/ (d+2) and i/d, yield the same remainder, but if both d and d+2, are larger than i, then 'i' could just take any value as the remainder.

Clearly insufficient

Statement 2 we have that i = (d)(d+2) + r

Now, if we replace in first term, we have that (d)(d+2) + r / (d+2), gives d as quotient but still we are left with r as a remainder of d+2. while we also know that i/d gives the same remainder. Here we learn that 'i' must be greater than d+2 since if gives quotient d. However, we still have no clue as to what remainder the division can yield

Both together, i>d, i = d(d+2) + r, and 'r' here is equal to the remainder of i/d = d(d+2) / d.

So r/d = r/d+2, but still no information on the remainder

(1) The remainder when i is divided by (d+2) is the same as when i is divided by d (2) The quotient when i is divided by (d+2) is d

What is the best way to tackle this kind of DS problems?

Question: What is the value of i?

How do you express stmnt 1 in an equation? Stmnt 1: The remainder when i is divided by (d+2) is the same as when i is divided by d.

Say when i is divided by d or d + 2, the remainder we obtain is r. Does this mean that if we subtract r from i, whatever is leftover will be divisible by d as well as (d+2)? So assuming that d and d+2 do not have any common factors (even if they do have common factors other than 1, they can only have 2 as a common factor), we can put it down as

i - r = d(d + 2)k i = d(d + 2)k + r Now for different values of d, k and r, values of i will be different.

Stmnt 2: The quotient when i is divided by (d+2) is d This tells us that i = d(d +2) + r Now for different values of d and r, values of i will be different.

Using both, we know that k is 1. But for different values of d and r, we can still have different values of i. Not sufficient.

Re: If i and d are integers, what is the value of i? [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Jul 2015, 05:37

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: If i and d are integers, what is the value of i? [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Sep 2016, 23:32

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Post-MBA I became very intrigued by how senior leaders navigated their career progression. It was also at this time that I realized I learned nothing about this during my...