Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 25 Oct 2016, 23:46

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If Jim saved a total of $90 in 3 weeks, how much did he save  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics Author Message Senior Manager Joined: 21 Jul 2009 Posts: 366 Schools: LBS, INSEAD, IMD, ISB - Anything with just 1 yr program. Followers: 17 Kudos [?]: 156 [1] , given: 22 If Jim saved a total of$90 in 3 weeks, how much did he save [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2010, 20:53
1
KUDOS
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

76% (02:08) correct 24% (01:46) wrong based on 73 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

If Jim saved a total of $90 in 3 weeks, how much did he save in week 2? 1) Jim's average savings for the first 2 weeks were$20
2) Jim's first week's savings were half of his savings in week 2 and a third of his savings in week 3

Let F be Jim's first week savings, S for second week and T for third week.

Can Stmt 2 be interpreted as F = (S/2) + (T/3)?

Rather, can somebody explain, what are the rules for interpreting statements to correct equations, especially for the statement above?
_________________

I am AWESOME and it's gonna be LEGENDARY!!!

Last edited by BarneyStinson on 26 Feb 2010, 08:45, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 209
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 1

Re: M01, Question 20, Interpretation of Stmt 2 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2010, 22:37
Let F be Jim's first week savings, S for second week and T for third week.

F=S/2=T/3

st 1) Not sufficient to find out how much Jim saved in week 2
st 2) using the above expression we can get Jims week 2 savings.

B
Manager
Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Posts: 193
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 6

Re: M01, Question 20, Interpretation of Stmt 2 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2010, 08:01
BarneyStinson wrote:
Can Stmt 2 be interpreted as F = (S/2) + (T/3)?

I think Stmt 2 shld be interpreted as F = (S/2) = (T/3)
Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 201
Concentration: General Management, Sustainability
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 12

Re: M01, Question 20, Interpretation of Stmt 2 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2010, 09:47
This is the way how I solve this question.
Let savings in 3 weeks is x,y,z respectively.
So x+y+z = 90
Statement 1 : average of first 2 weeks x+y /2 =20.
Not suff.

Statement 2: This means x+2x+3x=90
First week is half of second week and one third of third week is nothing but Jim had twice the saving second week and thrice the savings on third week.
This is sufficient to find how much Jim saved on second week.

Hope that helps.
Re: M01, Question 20, Interpretation of Stmt 2   [#permalink] 26 Feb 2010, 09:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by