Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

If k and x are positive integers and x is divisible by 6 [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Oct 2010, 16:10

3

This post received KUDOS

13

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (02:16) correct
45% (01:20) wrong based on 657 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

If k and x are positive integers and x is divisible by 6, which of the following CANNOT be the value of \(\sqrt{288kx}\) ?

A) \(24k\sqrt{3}\) B)\(24\sqrt{k}\) C)\(24\sqrt{3k}\) D)\(24\sqrt{6k}\) E)\(72\sqrt{k}\)

I got it wrong and I have had a look to the explanation and I am just wondering if it can be solved differently than the official explanation of MGMAT. I also thought it could be interesting as I have not found a previous thread with this question.

If k and x are positive integers and x is divisible by 6, which of the following CANNOT be the value of \sqrt{288kx} ?

A) 24k\sqrt{3} B)24\sqrt{k} C)24\sqrt{3k} D)24\sqrt{6k} E)72\sqrt{k}

I got it wrong and I have had a look to the explanation and I am just wondering if it can be solved differently than the official explanation of MGMAT.

x is divisible by 6 --> \(x=6n\) for some positive integer \(n\).

Now, for any values of positive integers \(k\) and \(n\) \(24\sqrt{3kn}\) is always more than \(24\sqrt{k}\) (B): \(24\sqrt{3kn}>24\sqrt{k}\) --> \(\sqrt{3n}>1\).

Thanks. It is kind of the same approach of the one in MGMAT so I guess I am gonna have to stick to this. I guess I don't have the initiative to say x=6n and then to compare.

This is not an ez one... u can also put x=6, k=1 and you can see A,B,C goes out quickly bc u found a very ez to spot solution for them...
_________________

How can one be sure that the expression here is 288*k*x and not 28800 + 10*K + x where K and x are integers?

Only multiplication sign is usually omitted so 288kx means 288*k*x. If it were meant to be 5-digit integer 288kx, where k is a tens digit and x is a units digit then this would be explicitly mentioned in the stem.
_________________

I still dont understand it. It is clear that 24\sqrt{3kn} > 24\sqrt{k}. But isn't it also greater than 24\sqrt{3k} ?

Not really. For, x=6, n=1; \(24\sqrt{3kn}=24\sqrt{3k}\)

Likewise; For, n=k; \(24\sqrt{3kn}=24\sqrt{3k^2}=24k\sqrt{3}\) For, x=12, n=2; \(24\sqrt{3kn}=24\sqrt{6k}\) For, x=18, n=3; \(24\sqrt{3kn}=24\sqrt{3^2k}=72\sqrt{k}\)

But to make \(24\sqrt{3kn}=24\sqrt{k}\), n should be 1/3 and we know that n is an integer. Not possible.
_________________

Option a- Posible if n*x=k^2 Option b- Not possible as x is an integer, it cannot be a fraction. (6n=k=an integer, x is an integer). For this to be true, k=1 and x=2 not possible as k is a multiple of 6 or k=3 again not possible.

Re: If k and x are positive integers and x is divisible by 6 [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Sep 2013, 12:02

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

If k and x are positive integers and x is divisible by 6, which of the following CANNOT be the value of \sqrt{288kx} ?

A) 24k\sqrt{3} B)24\sqrt{k} C)24\sqrt{3k} D)24\sqrt{6k} E)72\sqrt{k}

I got it wrong and I have had a look to the explanation and I am just wondering if it can be solved differently than the official explanation of MGMAT.

x is divisible by 6 --> \(x=6n\) for some positive integer \(n\).

Now, for any values of positive integers \(k\) and \(n\) \(24\sqrt{3kn}\) is always more than \(24\sqrt{k}\) (B): \(24\sqrt{3kn}>24\sqrt{k}\) --> \(\sqrt{3n}>1\).

Answer: B.

Can you explain how you know that? I got C for an answer...

If k and x are positive integers and x is divisible by 6, which of the following CANNOT be the value of \sqrt{288kx} ?

A) 24k\sqrt{3} B)24\sqrt{k} C)24\sqrt{3k} D)24\sqrt{6k} E)72\sqrt{k}

I got it wrong and I have had a look to the explanation and I am just wondering if it can be solved differently than the official explanation of MGMAT.

x is divisible by 6 --> \(x=6n\) for some positive integer \(n\).

Now, for any values of positive integers \(k\) and \(n\) \(24\sqrt{3kn}\) is always more than \(24\sqrt{k}\) (B): \(24\sqrt{3kn}>24\sqrt{k}\) --> \(\sqrt{3n}>1\).

Answer: B.

Can you explain how you know that? I got C for an answer...

That's because for any values of positive integers \(k\) and \(n\), \(\sqrt{3kn}>\sqrt{k}\)
_________________

If k and x are positive integers and x is divisible by 6, which of the following CANNOT be the value of \sqrt{288kx} ?

A) 24k\sqrt{3} B)24\sqrt{k} C)24\sqrt{3k} D)24\sqrt{6k} E)72\sqrt{k}

I got it wrong and I have had a look to the explanation and I am just wondering if it can be solved differently than the official explanation of MGMAT.

x is divisible by 6 --> \(x=6n\) for some positive integer \(n\).

Now, for any values of positive integers \(k\) and \(n\) \(24\sqrt{3kn}\) is always more than \(24\sqrt{k}\) (B): \(24\sqrt{3kn}>24\sqrt{k}\) --> \(\sqrt{3n}>1\).

Answer: B.

Makes complete sense when the steps are listed out in such a way. Question though -- when I read the statement that x is divisible by 6, I started to work with the primes (2 & 3) and tried to correlate that to the prime of (288). Why is that approach incorrect in this problem?

I realize that there is no sure fire way to encompass every problem but it just seems odd that we solve a lot of problems by factoring down to their primes but in this case, we added an unknown variable to solve the problem?

If k and x are positive integers and x is divisible by 6, which of the following CANNOT be the value of \sqrt{288kx} ?

A) 24k\sqrt{3} B)24\sqrt{k} C)24\sqrt{3k} D)24\sqrt{6k} E)72\sqrt{k}

I got it wrong and I have had a look to the explanation and I am just wondering if it can be solved differently than the official explanation of MGMAT.

x is divisible by 6 --> \(x=6n\) for some positive integer \(n\).

Now, for any values of positive integers \(k\) and \(n\) \(24\sqrt{3kn}\) is always more than \(24\sqrt{k}\) (B): \(24\sqrt{3kn}>24\sqrt{k}\) --> \(\sqrt{3n}>1\).

Answer: B.

Makes complete sense when the steps are listed out in such a way. Question though -- when I read the statement that x is divisible by 6, I started to work with the primes (2 & 3) and tried to correlate that to the prime of (288). Why is that approach incorrect in this problem?

I realize that there is no sure fire way to encompass every problem but it just seems odd that we solve a lot of problems by factoring down to their primes but in this case, we added an unknown variable to solve the problem?

Thanks!

We are told that a positive integer x is divisible by 6. It can be 6, 12, 18, 24, ... So, it can have some other primes than 2 and 3. That's why we need to represent it as 6n, where n is a positive integer and not just assume that it's 6.

As for factorization: as you can see that along the way we do factorize 6n into 2*3*n.

Re: If k and x are positive integers and x is divisible by 6 [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 May 2015, 05:46

I am really bad with number properties... So what I did was estimating the squareroot of 288XX which I thought to be something around 170. Then I went through the solutions estimating which of them could be around 170, and I could elimate B. 24 times squareroot of 9 ( the highest digit for k) would def be less than 170

I am really bad with number properties... So what I did was estimating the squareroot of 288XX which I thought to be something around 170. Then I went through the solutions estimating which of them could be around 170, and I could elimate B. 24 times squareroot of 9 ( the highest digit for k) would def be less than 170

This is definitely not the way to solve this question. Even though you got the right answer, let me tell you the gaps in your methodology:

1. Please note that k and x are not single unit digits at the tens and units place of the number 288kx. The number is 288 *k *x. Hence, the number is not around 288XX for which the square root will be around 170. x can be any multiple of 6 and k can be any other positive integer. So value of 288kx can be far greater than 288XX.

2. Since k and x may not be single unit digits, assuming maximum value of k to be 9 is not correct. k is a positive integer and can take any value which may be greater than 9.

Simplifying the number by prime factorizing and then evaluating the options would be the right way to go about this question.

Hope its clear! Let me know if you need help at any point of this question.

Re: If k and x are positive integers and x is divisible by 6 [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Jan 2016, 14:07

Could someone please tell me if this is a correct way to solve the problem.

Given that X is divisible by 6, it has prime factors of 3 and 2. Prime factors of 288 are 2,2,2,2,2,3,3 Combined, under the square root, we have the prime factors 2,2,2,2,2,2,3,3,3, and k

I concluded that B is the answer because it was missing a prime factor 3.

Could someone please tell me if this is a correct way to solve the problem.

Given that X is divisible by 6, it has prime factors of 3 and 2. Prime factors of 288 are 2,2,2,2,2,3,3 Combined, under the square root, we have the prime factors 2,2,2,2,2,2,3,3,3, and k

I concluded that B is the answer because it was missing a prime factor 3.

Yes, that is a correct approach but an incomplete one. When x = 6p, where p=positive integer, then x can be any 1 of multiples of 6 = 6 or 12 or 18 or 24 etc. So you would have prime factors (2*3*p) and not just (2*3). This is a very small but important difference that might become important in other questions.

Another approach to this question is as follows:

We are given that x is a divisible by 6 ---> x = 6p =2*3*p

Now analyse the options (a very important tool in GMAT quant) to eliminate options that are possible (as we need to mark the option that is NOT possible).

\(A) 24k\sqrt{3}\). Possible with p=k. Eliminate \(B)24\sqrt{k}\). Not possible unless p =1/3 , not allowed as this will make x not an integer ---> against the given statement. Keep. \(C)24\sqrt{3k}\). Possible with p=1. Eliminate. \(D)24\sqrt{6k}\). Possible with p=2. Eliminate. \(E)72\sqrt{k}\). Possible with p=3. Eliminate.

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...