Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

DS - positive or negative [#permalink]
21 Nov 2007, 06:59

If K is not equal to 0, 1, -1, is 1/k >0?

(1) 1/(k-1) >0

(2) 1/(k+1) >0

I chose D, but the OA is A.
In statement 1, the only way it can be positive is to have K greater than or equal to 2, which subsequently 1/k will always be positive.
As for statement 2, the only way it can be positive is also by using a number either greater than or equal to 2 in order to end up with 1/k as positive, yet according to the OA, statement 2 is not suff. can someone explain to me how?
thanks

Re: DS - positive or negative [#permalink]
21 Nov 2007, 07:03

tarek99 wrote:

If K is not equal to 0, 1, -1, is 1/k >0?

(1) 1/(k-1) >0

(2) 1/(k+1) >0

I chose D, but the OA is A. In statement 1, the only way it can be positive is to have K greater than or equal to 2, which subsequently 1/k will always be positive. As for statement 2, the only way it can be positive is also by using a number either greater than or equal to 2 in order to end up with 1/k as positive, yet according to the OA, statement 2 is not suff. can someone explain to me how? thanks

I got A.

Statement 2 works if say, x = -0.9 as it would read - 1/0.1 >0
However, 1/-0.9 < 0

A, as statement b fails when k=-0.5 or any other decimal lower than 1.

Did you plug in the different values of "K" or did you solve the inequality in general? Could you please elaborate on logical approach?

LM wrote:

If K is not equal to 0,1,-1, is \(1/k > 0\)?

( i ) \(1/(k-1)>0\)

( ii ) \(1/(k+1)>0\)

A My reasoning: the question is similar to k>0?, and keep the condition of k in mind. Go 1, 1/(k-1) >0, again similar to k-1 >0, so k>1, not only satify the conditions but also answer the question. Sufficient 2. again: k+1>0, so k>-1. Stop and think a little. Although combined with the conditions " k is not equal 0, 1, even -1, it still not enought to answer the question. k still can be equal to any fraction running from -1 to 0. Right? _________________

Interested in applying for an MBA? In the fourth and final part of our live QA series with guest expert Chioma Isiadinso, co-founder of consultancy Expartus and former admissions...