Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 02 Sep 2014, 01:17

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If m>0 and n>o, is (m+x)/(n+x) greater than m/n ?

Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Posts: 92
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 12

If m>0 and n>o, is (m+x)/(n+x) greater than m/n ? [#permalink]  14 Apr 2011, 02:14
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

78% (01:19) correct 22% (00:44) wrong based on 32 sessions
If m>0 and n>o, is (m+x)/(n+x) greater than m/n ?

(1) m < n
(2) x > 0
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2047
Followers: 128

Kudos [?]: 906 [0], given: 376

Re: Another DS [#permalink]  14 Apr 2011, 02:50
whichscore wrote:
If m>0 and n>0, is (m+x)/(n+x) greater than m/n ?
1. m < n
2. x > 0

\frac{m+x}{n+x} > \frac{m}{n}

\frac{m+x}{n+x} - \frac{m}{n} > 0

\frac{mn+nx-mn-mx}{n(n+x)} > 0

A: Does \frac{x(n-m)}{n(n+x)} > 0?

1. m<n

m-n<0
n-m>0

But, what if x<0 \hspace{2} & \hspace{2} |x|<n
Then the answer to the question would be No.

If x>0
Then the answer to the question would be Yes.
Not Sufficient.

2. x>0

Denominator is +ve.
Numerator must be +ve to make the expression true.

n-m>0
n>m should be true to make the expression true. But, it is not given which of the two is greater.

If n>m, the answer would be Yes.
If n<m, the answer would be No.

Combining both statements:
Denominator becomes +ve.
Numerator also becomes +ve as m<n
Answer to the question is Yes.
Sufficient.

Ans: "C"
_________________
Director
Status: Matriculating
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 931
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 193 [0], given: 123

Re: Another DS [#permalink]  14 Apr 2011, 03:26
1) Insufficient.
Lets consider m = 1 n = 2
If x = 0 The answer is NO
If x = 1 The answer is YES

2) Insufficient
consider m = n = 1 x = 1 The answer is NO
Consider m = 1 n = 2 x = 1 The answer is YES

1) + 2) Consider m = 1 n = 2 x = 1 The answer is YES. Sufficient

whichscore wrote:
If m>0 and n>o, is (m+x)/(n+x) greater than m/n ?
1. m < n
2. x > 0
SVP
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1691
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 288 [0], given: 36

Re: Another DS [#permalink]  14 Apr 2011, 04:24
As per (1)

m = 2, n = 3

m/n = 2/3

if x = -2, then 0/1 < 2/3

if x = 0 then (m+0)/(n +0) = m/n

if x = 2 then (2 + 2)/(3+2) = 4/5 > 2/3

(1) is insufficient

As per (2)

x > 0, but it's possible that m = n , and hence (m+x)/(n+x) = m/n

(2) is insufficient

(1) and (2) together

if x = 1, m = 2, n = 3

(2 + 1)/(3 + 1) = 3/4 hence m/n < (m+x)/(n+x)

if x = 2, m = 2, n = 3 then (2 + 2)/(3+2) = 4/5 > 2/3 hence m/n < (m+x)/(n+x)

_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2011
Posts: 770
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 42

Re: Another DS [#permalink]  14 Apr 2011, 05:12
Rephrasing given expression we have ((n-m)x)/(n(n+x)) >0?

1. Not sufficient as we don't know anything about x.

2. Not sufficient as we don't know anything about m,n

Together we have n>m & x>0 . sufficient to answer.

Posted from my mobile device
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 4699
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1090

Kudos [?]: 4890 [3] , given: 163

Re: Another DS [#permalink]  14 Apr 2011, 13:31
3
KUDOS
Expert's post
whichscore wrote:
If m>0 and n>o, is (m+x)/(n+x) greater than m/n ?
1. m < n
2. x > 0

It is useful to understand that when you add the same positive number to the numerator and denominator of a positive fraction, it moves towards 1.

Say 1/2 = 0.5
I add 1 to both numerator and denominator, it becomes 2/3 = 0.67 i.e. closer to 1 than 1/2
Say 3/2 = 1.5
I add 1 to both numerator and denominator, it becomes 4/3 = 1.33 i.e. closer to 1

When you add the same negative number (or in other words, subtract the same positive number) to the numerator and denominator of a positive fraction, it moves away from 1.

Say 1/2 = 0.5
I add -1 to both numerator and denominator, it becomes 0 i.e. farther from 1 than 1/2
Say 3/2 = 1.5
I add -1 to both numerator and denominator, it becomes 2/1 i.e. farther from 1

Once you understand this, the question takes a few seconds.

1. m < n
The fraction m/n must be less than 1. So if x is positive, the fraction will increase and move towards 1. If x is negative, the fraction will decrease to move away from 1. Not sufficient.

2. x > 0
x is positive but we do not know whether the fraction is greater than 1 or less than 1. If m/n is greater than 1, it will decrease and move towards 1. If m/n is less than 1, it will increase and move towards 1.

Using both together, m/n is less than 1 and x is positive so we are adding the same positive number to both numerator and denominator. Hence (m+x)/(n+x) will be greater than m/n to move towards 1.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Save $100 on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options. Veritas Prep Reviews Senior Manager Joined: 08 Nov 2010 Posts: 422 WE 1: Business Development Followers: 7 Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 161 Re: Another DS [#permalink] 15 Apr 2011, 11:20 great explanation. thanks karishma. _________________ Manager Joined: 16 May 2011 Posts: 77 Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 2 Re: If m>0 and n>o, is (m+x)/(n+x) greater than m/n ? 1. m [#permalink] 06 Mar 2012, 06:30 Why cant we cross multiply to get; mn + nx > mn + mx, simplify, resulting is n>m?? is this totally wrong? Math Expert Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 25239 Followers: 3430 Kudos [?]: 25245 [1] , given: 2702 Re: If m>0 and n>o, is (m+x)/(n+x) greater than m/n ? 1. m [#permalink] 06 Mar 2012, 07:08 1 This post received KUDOS Expert's post dchow23 wrote: Why cant we cross multiply to get; mn + nx > mn + mx, simplify, resulting is n>m?? is this totally wrong? Cross-multiplying (m+x)/(n+x)>m/n would be wrong, since we don't know whether n+x is positive or negative: if n+x>0 then we would have as you've written mn+nx>mn+mx BUT if n+x<0 then when multiplying by negative number we should flip the sign of the inequity and write mn+nx<mn+mx. General rule: never multiply or divide inequality by a variable (or by an expression with variable) unless you are sure of its sign since you do not know whether you must flip the sign of the inequality. Hope it's clear. _________________ Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 4699 Location: Pune, India Followers: 1090 Kudos [?]: 4890 [0], given: 163 Re: If m>0 and n>o, is (m+x)/(n+x) greater than m/n ? 1. m [#permalink] 06 Mar 2012, 10:17 Expert's post dchow23 wrote: Why cant we cross multiply to get; mn + nx > mn + mx, simplify, resulting is n>m?? is this totally wrong? Yes, cross multiplying is incorrect here. We do not know whether (n+x) is positive or negative. We know that m and n are positive but we know nothing about x. When you multiply an inequality by a positive number, the inequality sign stays the same but when you multiply an inequality by a negative number, the inequality sign flips. So before you multiply/divide an inequality by a variable, you need to know whether the variable is positive or negative. _________________ Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog Save$100 on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Intern
Joined: 22 Jan 2012
Posts: 6
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: If m>0 and n>o, is (m+x)/(n+x) greater than m/n ? [#permalink]  07 Mar 2012, 09:53
@flute, thanks for the solution.
Re: If m>0 and n>o, is (m+x)/(n+x) greater than m/n ?   [#permalink] 07 Mar 2012, 09:53
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
If m>0, n>0, is (m+x)/(n+x) > m/n? 4 25 Aug 2008, 02:41
If m > 0 and n > 0, is (m+x)/(n+x) > m/n 1) m < 2 22 Jun 2008, 12:33
If m>0 and n>0, is (m+x)/(n+x) > m/n? (1) m is less 8 23 Aug 2007, 17:44
If m>0 and n>0, is m+x/n+x > m/n? 4 09 Jun 2007, 21:14
3 If m > 0 and n > 0, is (m+x)/(n+x) > m/n? 7 12 Mar 2006, 19:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by