Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 27 Mar 2015, 17:51

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If m>0, n>0, is (m+x)/(n+x)>m/n? 1. m<n 2.

Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 345
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

If m>0, n>0, is (m+x)/(n+x)>m/n? 1. m<n 2. [#permalink]  26 May 2004, 17:27
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
If m>0, n>0, is (m+x)/(n+x)>m/n?

1. m<n
2. x>0
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 358
Location: Manhattan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

my vote goes to 'C'
a doesn't work since x could be negative
b doesn't work since we don't know whether 'n' or 'm' is largest
c combines the two and we have a solution

any thoughts?
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1797
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 0

A) m = 0.1 n = 0.2 m/n = 0.5 if x = 1000 then (m+x)/(n+x) = 1
so (m+x)/(n+x) > m/n
but if x = -0.1 then (m+x)/(n+x) < m/n
(Insufficient)

B) if m = n then (m+x)/(n+x) = m/n
but if m = 0.1 n = 0.2 x = 0.1 then (m+x)/(n+x) > m/n
(insufficient)

if you combine you can tell (m+x)/(n+x) > m/n

I think the answer is C.
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 329
Location: There
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: DS: Inequality challange-3 [#permalink]  26 May 2004, 20:56
Substract 1 from both sides

(m-n)/(n+x) > (m-n)/n

let g = (m-n)/(n+x) -(m-n)/n = (n-m)x/[n(n+x)]

1 and 2 each alone are not sufficient.
combined, g > 0

C it is
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 294
Location: US
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

C here too.

To evaluate the equation, we need to know if m>n OR if m< n. We also need to know whether x is +ve or -ve.
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 345
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

If m>0, n>0, is (m+x)/(n+x)>m/n?

1. m<n
2. x>0

(m+x)/(n+x)>m/n
n(m+x)>m(n+x)
mn+nx>mn+mx
nx>mx

We can not divide both by x, because x can be negative resuting in changes of inequalities.

nx>mx this would be true if m>0, n>0, n>m & x>0

Manager
Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 183
Location: Ukraine, Russia(part-time)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: DS: Inequality challange-3 [#permalink]  29 May 2004, 02:45
mirhaque wrote:
If m>0, n>0, is (m+x)/(n+x)>m/n?

1. m<n
2. x>0

1 is not sufficient: x = -1, m = 1, n = 2.

2 is not sufficient: x = 1000, m = 2, n = 1.

1 and 2 are sufficient: (m+x)/(n+x)>m/n <=> (m + x)n > (n + x)m <=> n > m (since x > 0, n + x > 0, m + x > 0, n, m > 0).
Re: DS: Inequality challange-3   [#permalink] 29 May 2004, 02:45
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
If m > 0 and n > 0, is (m+x)/(n+x) > m/n 1) m < 2 22 Jun 2008, 12:33
If m>0 and n>0, is (m+x)/(n+x) > m/n? (1) m is less 8 23 Aug 2007, 17:44
If m>0 and n>0, is (m+x)/(n+x) > m/n? (1) m<n 4 19 Mar 2007, 07:21
If M>0 and N>0, is M+X/N+X > M/N ? 1) M<N 2) 7 14 Sep 2005, 16:31
If m>0 and n>0 is (m+x)/(n+x) >m/n ? 4 04 May 2005, 20:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by