Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
26 May 2010, 07:53

4

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

MateoLibre wrote:

I'm studying using Jeff Sackman's "Total GMAT Math" and I feel like one of the DS question answers is wrong in the answer guide. Here is the question:

If m and n are negative, is m/n less than 1? (1) mn<1 (2) m-n>n

I say B. The guide says E. Can anyone explain?

Hi, welcome to the Gmat Club. Below is the solution for your question:

Given m<0 and n<0. Q: is \frac{m}{n}<1? --> is m>n? (when multiplying by negative n, switch the sign).

(1) mn<1. As both are negative --> 0<mn<1. Clearly insufficient to conclude which one is greater.

(2) m-n>n --> m>2n. If m=-3 and n=-2 answer is NO but if m=-3 and n=-4 answer is YES. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) m=-0.2 and n=-1, both conditions satisfied --> m>nBUTm=-1.1 and n=-0.6, again both conditions satisfied --> m<n. Two different answers. Not sufficient.

Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
26 May 2010, 10:19

1

This post received KUDOS

Bunuel- Wow. Thanks for the quick response to that. I'm still new to DS questions. I'm only about a week and a half deep into my GMAT studying, so I have a long way to go. It makes more sense to me now. I feel like I'm making a lot of careless mistakes, especially when it comes to DS questions. I guess I need to just keep practicing. Anyway, seriously thanks.

Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
30 Oct 2010, 20:17

Bunuel wrote:

MateoLibre wrote:

I'm studying using Jeff Sackman's "Total GMAT Math" and I feel like one of the DS question answers is wrong in the answer guide. Here is the question:

If m and n are negative, is m/n less than 1? (1) mn<1 (2) m-n>n

I say B. The guide says E. Can anyone explain?

Hi, welcome to the Gmat Club. Below is the solution for your question:

Given m<0 and n<0. Q: is \frac{m}{n}<1? --> is m>n? (when multiplying by negative n, switch the sign).

(1) mn<1. As both are negative --> 0<mn<1. Clearly insufficient to conclude which one is greater.

(2) m-n>n --> m>2n. If m=-3 and n=-2 answer is NO but if m=-3 and n=-4 answer is YES. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) m=-0.2 and n=-1, both conditions satisfied --> m>nBUTm=-1.1 and n=-0.6, again both conditions satisfied --> m<n. Two different answers. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.

Hope it helps.

I solved it, but it took me many minutes. I still wondering how you know the right steps to solve it so fast _________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
05 Dec 2010, 04:00

Hi bunuel,

I could not understand statement 2 ; m>2n you have taken m=-3 and n =-2 this makes -3>-4 which will be 3<4 true and in second case you have taken m=-3 and n=-4 this will make -3>-8 3<8this is also true ..i could not understand Pleas explain

Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
05 Dec 2010, 04:34

Expert's post

rite2deepti wrote:

Hi bunuel,

I could not understand statement 2 ; m>2n you have taken m=-3 and n =-2 this makes -3>-4 which will be 3<4 true and in second case you have taken m=-3 and n=-4 this will make -3>-8 3<8this is also true ..i could not understand Pleas explain

Given m<0 and n<0. Question: is m>n?

(2) m-n>n --> m>2n. If m=-3 and n=-2, (these values satisfy both the stem and statement: both are negative and -3>2*(-2)), then as m=-3<-2=n the answer is NO; If m=-3 and n=-4, (these values satisfy both the stem and statement: both are negative and -3>2*(-4)), then as m=-3>-4=n the answer is YES. Not sufficient.

Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
05 Dec 2010, 18:24

Expert's post

I have a random question on this problem.

For the second statement, you're given that m - n > n, so why can't you just divide the whole thing out by n, in which case you get an expression with m/n? I can intuitively sense it's wrong but I can't place my finger on why.

Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
05 Dec 2010, 23:31

Expert's post

whiplash2411 wrote:

I have a random question on this problem.

For the second statement, you're given that m - n > n, so why can't you just divide the whole thing out by n, in which case you get an expression with m/n? I can intuitively sense it's wrong but I can't place my finger on why.

It's not wrong at all, in fact it's a valid algebraic way to deal with statement (2).

Statement (2): m-n>n --> m>2n --> divide both parts by n (note that as given that n is negative then we should switch sign): \frac{m}{n}<2 --> but this is not sufficient to say whether \frac{m}{n}<1. _________________

Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
05 Dec 2010, 23:37

3

This post received KUDOS

Friends,

In GMAT, to avoid the confusion with the negative #s, i use my own and simple technique that is as below.

PLEASE NOTE THAT: DEALING WITH THE INEQUALITIES THAT CONTAIN +VE #s IS EASIER THAN DEALING WITH THOSE CONTAIN -VE#S.

Given: m and n are -ve #s I take: x and y as +ve #s.

now i write m = -x and n = -y

FROM NOW ON I AM GONNA DEAL WITH THE +VE #S ONLY. I CAN NOT BE TRAPPED BY THE TESTMAKER.

qtn: is m/n less than 1? == > is -x/-y < 1 ==> is x/y<1 ==> is x < y (NOTE: as x and y both are +ve, i can safely cross multiply).

(1) mn<1

==> (-x)(-y)<1 ==> xy<1 : our qtn is "is x<y", why is y a greatest person than x or vice-versa. As their product is < 1 ==> means, they can always inerchange their values with out effecting thier product. So x could b < y or vice-versa. NOT SUFF.

(2) m-n>n

==> -x+y>-y ==> x-y<y ==> x< 2y ==> x/y < 2 (Again note that x and y both are +ve and hence i can safely cross multiply)

hence x/y is < 2, aren't there any other #s between 2 and 1, how can i say that x/y is < 1 knwoing that x/y is < 2....NOT SUFF.

1 & 2 together , xy<1 and x/y<2...Can't even be combined...NO LUCK...NOT SUFF.

Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
06 Dec 2010, 06:52

Expert's post

Ah, thanks Bunuel. The sign conversion was what tripped me up. Forgot to read the part that said they were negative numbers; should pay more attention.

Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
06 Dec 2010, 21:48

Bunuel, I was wondering about the -.2 and -1 and the -1.1 and -.6. Did you use these particular figures for a purpose or were they just easy numbers you knew configured into a number less than 1. Allowing you to make M as big as possible then M as small as possible?

Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
07 Dec 2010, 04:19

Expert's post

mmcooley33 wrote:

Bunuel, I was wondering about the -.2 and -1 and the -1.1 and -.6. Did you use these particular figures for a purpose or were they just easy numbers you knew configured into a number less than 1. Allowing you to make M as big as possible then M as small as possible?

Question asks is \frac{m}{n}<1? or is m>n?

From (1) we have: 0<mn<1, which is useless (whether alone or combined with 2) to answer which variable is greater.

From (2) we have: \frac{m}{n}<2, so \frac{m}{n} is less than 2 but we can not say whether it's less than 1, so again this statement is useless to answer the question.

So even not testing the numbers we could say that the answer is E. But to show this, to demonstrate that the answer is E I just picked 2 sets of numbers, first set m>n and the second m<n, also with little trial and error it's not hard to get the numbers to satisfy stem and the statements (remember on DS questions when plugging numbers, goal is to prove that the statement is not sufficient. So we should try to get a YES answer with one chosen number(s) and a NO with another). _________________

Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
14 Feb 2013, 14:17

rite2deepti wrote:

Hi bunuel,

I could not understand statement 2 ; m>2n you have taken m=-3 and n =-2 this makes -3>-4 which will be 3<4 true and in second case you have taken m=-3 and n=-4 this will make -3>-8 3<8this is also true ..i could not understand Pleas explain

rite2deepti,

I thought the same, but you have to look at the question itself m>n?

Plugging m = -3 and n = -2 this yields -3 > -4 which is correct, however, the question is -3>-2 and this is incorrect, thats why its a NO.

For the second case m = -3 and n = -4 this yields -3 > -8 which is correct, and YES as an answer -3>-4. Having this, we can conclude its INSUFFICIENT, NO AND YES. _________________

MV "Better to fight for something than live for nothing.” ― George S. Patton Jr

Re: If m and n are negative, is m/n less than 1? [#permalink]
09 May 2014, 10:44

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

I attended a portfolio workshop hosted by Business Design club today. Competing against thousands of MBA students with the entire world, you need more than your resume and coverletter...

so actually alongside the MBA studies, I am studying for personal trainer exam in December as a side. I can basically only read when I’m in the subway...