|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Intern
Status: Current Student
Joined: 16 May 2010
Posts: 44
Schools: Darden '13
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
6
[1] , given: 4
|
If m and n are negative, is m/n less than 1? [#permalink]
26 May 2010, 07:35
1
This post received KUDOS
Question Stats:
27% (02:48) correct
72% (01:05) wrong based on 6 sessions
If m and n are negative, is m/n less than 1? (1) mn<1 (2) m-n>n I'm studying using Jeff Sackman's " Total GMAT Math" and I feel like one of the DS question answers is wrong in the answer guide. I say B. The guide says E. Can anyone explain?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club team member
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 11515
Followers: 1791
Kudos [?]:
9533
[2] , given: 826
|
Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
26 May 2010, 08:53
2
This post received KUDOS
MateoLibre wrote: I'm studying using Jeff Sackman's " Total GMAT Math" and I feel like one of the DS question answers is wrong in the answer guide. Here is the question: If m and n are negative, is m/ n less than 1? (1) mn<1 (2) m- n> nI say B. The guide says E. Can anyone explain? Hi, welcome to the Gmat Club. Below is the solution for your question: Given m<0 and n<0. Q: is \frac{m}{n}<1? --> is m>n? (when multiplying by negative n, switch the sign). (1) mn<1. As both are negative --> 0<mn<1. Clearly insufficient to conclude which one is greater. (2) m-n>n --> m>2n. If m=-3 and n=-2 answer is NO but if m=-3 and n=-4 answer is YES. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) m=-0.2 and n=-1, both conditions satisfied --> m>n BUT m=-1.1 and n=-0.6, again both conditions satisfied --> m<n. Two different answers. Not sufficient. Answer: E. Hope it helps.
_________________
PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!
RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory
COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. NEW!!!
DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set. NEW!!!
 What are GMAT Club Tests? 25 extra-hard Quant Tests
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 48
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
Schools: Indian School of Business (ISB) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
WE: Other (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
8
[1] , given: 9
|
Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
26 May 2010, 09:04
1
This post received KUDOS
Hi Mateo,
Stem says m and n are neg or m<0 and n<0. It does not state that m and n are integers. It asks us whether m/n<1, which means whether |m|<|n|.
1. m*n<1
This can happen in 3 cases
I. |m|<1 and |n|<1 (eg |-0.25| and |-0.5| or |-0.5| and |-0.25|)---> presenting 2 cases |m|/|n|>1 or |m|/|n|<1
II. |m|<1 and |n|>1 (eg |-0.25| and |-1|)---> |m|/|n|>1
III. |m|>1 and |n|<1 (eg |-1| and |-0.25|)---> |m|/|n|<1
Hence Insufficient.
2. m-n>n ---> m-2n>0 This can only happen when |m|<2*|n|-----> |m|/|n|<2, which does not necessarily mean <1. Hence insufficient
Combining statements 1 and 2, we cannot get a solution since, |m|/|n| can be <2 but >1, or < 2 and <1.
Hence, E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Status: Current Student
Joined: 16 May 2010
Posts: 44
Schools: Darden '13
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
6
[1] , given: 4
|
Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
26 May 2010, 11:19
1
This post received KUDOS
Bunuel- Wow. Thanks for the quick response to that. I'm still new to DS questions. I'm only about a week and a half deep into my GMAT studying, so I have a long way to go. It makes more sense to me now. I feel like I'm making a lot of careless mistakes, especially when it comes to DS questions. I guess I need to just keep practicing. Anyway, seriously thanks.
Matt
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 447
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
25
[0], given: 112
|
Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
24 Sep 2010, 21:37
Hey Matt All the best .. I read your post today and guess we are sailing in the same boat cheers !!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1756
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 50
Kudos [?]:
145
[0], given: 108
|
Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
30 Oct 2010, 21:17
Bunuel wrote: MateoLibre wrote: I'm studying using Jeff Sackman's " Total GMAT Math" and I feel like one of the DS question answers is wrong in the answer guide. Here is the question: If m and n are negative, is m/ n less than 1? (1) mn<1 (2) m- n> nI say B. The guide says E. Can anyone explain? Hi, welcome to the Gmat Club. Below is the solution for your question: Given m<0 and n<0. Q: is \frac{m}{n}<1? --> is m>n? (when multiplying by negative n, switch the sign). (1) mn<1. As both are negative --> 0<mn<1. Clearly insufficient to conclude which one is greater. (2) m-n>n --> m>2n. If m=-3 and n=-2 answer is NO but if m=-3 and n=-4 answer is YES. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) m=-0.2 and n=-1, both conditions satisfied --> m>n BUT m=-1.1 and n=-0.6, again both conditions satisfied --> m<n. Two different answers. Not sufficient. Answer: E. Hope it helps. I solved it, but it took me many minutes. I still wondering how you know the right steps to solve it so fast
_________________
"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."
My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 50
WE 1: Business Development Manger
WE 2: Assistant Manager-Carbon Trading
WE 3: Manager-Carbon Trading
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 16
|
Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
05 Dec 2010, 05:00
Hi bunuel,
I could not understand statement 2 ; m>2n you have taken m=-3 and n =-2 this makes -3>-4 which will be 3<4 true and in second case you have taken m=-3 and n=-4 this will make -3>-8 3<8this is also true ..i could not understand Pleas explain
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club team member
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 11515
Followers: 1791
Kudos [?]:
9533
[0], given: 826
|
Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
05 Dec 2010, 05:34
rite2deepti wrote: Hi bunuel,
I could not understand statement 2 ; m>2n you have taken m=-3 and n =-2 this makes -3>-4 which will be 3<4 true and in second case you have taken m=-3 and n=-4 this will make -3>-8 3<8this is also true ..i could not understand Pleas explain Given m<0 and n<0. Question: is m>n? (2) m-n>n --> m>2n. If m=-3 and n=-2, (these values satisfy both the stem and statement: both are negative and -3>2*(-2)), then as m=-3<-2=n the answer is NO; If m=-3 and n=-4, (these values satisfy both the stem and statement: both are negative and -3>2*(-4)), then as m=-3>-4=n the answer is YES. Not sufficient. Hope it's clear.
_________________
PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!
RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory
COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. NEW!!!
DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set. NEW!!!
 What are GMAT Club Tests? 25 extra-hard Quant Tests
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. Big Fat Panda
Status: Biting Nails Into Oblivion
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1859
Followers: 293
Kudos [?]:
1114
[0], given: 194
|
Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
05 Dec 2010, 19:24
I have a random question on this problem.
For the second statement, you're given that m - n > n, so why can't you just divide the whole thing out by n, in which case you get an expression with m/n? I can intuitively sense it's wrong but I can't place my finger on why.
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club team member
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 11515
Followers: 1791
Kudos [?]:
9533
[0], given: 826
|
Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
06 Dec 2010, 00:31
whiplash2411 wrote: I have a random question on this problem.
For the second statement, you're given that m - n > n, so why can't you just divide the whole thing out by n, in which case you get an expression with m/n? I can intuitively sense it's wrong but I can't place my finger on why. It's not wrong at all, in fact it's a valid algebraic way to deal with statement (2). Statement (2): m-n>n --> m>2n --> divide both parts by n (note that as given that n is negative then we should switch sign): \frac{m}{n}<2 --> but this is not sufficient to say whether \frac{m}{n}<1.
_________________
PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!
RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory
COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. NEW!!!
DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set. NEW!!!
 What are GMAT Club Tests? 25 extra-hard Quant Tests
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 30 Aug 2010
Posts: 94
Location: Bangalore, India
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
44
[1] , given: 27
|
Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
06 Dec 2010, 00:37
1
This post received KUDOS
Friends,
In GMAT, to avoid the confusion with the negative #s, i use my own and simple technique that is as below.
PLEASE NOTE THAT: DEALING WITH THE INEQUALITIES THAT CONTAIN +VE #s IS EASIER THAN DEALING WITH THOSE CONTAIN -VE#S.
Given: m and n are -ve #s I take: x and y as +ve #s.
now i write m = -x and n = -y
FROM NOW ON I AM GONNA DEAL WITH THE +VE #S ONLY. I CAN NOT BE TRAPPED BY THE TESTMAKER.
qtn: is m/n less than 1? == > is -x/-y < 1 ==> is x/y<1 ==> is x < y (NOTE: as x and y both are +ve, i can safely cross multiply).
(1) mn<1
==> (-x)(-y)<1 ==> xy<1 : our qtn is "is x<y", why is y a greatest person than x or vice-versa. As their product is < 1 ==> means, they can always inerchange their values with out effecting thier product. So x could b < y or vice-versa. NOT SUFF.
(2) m-n>n
==> -x+y>-y ==> x-y<y ==> x< 2y ==> x/y < 2 (Again note that x and y both are +ve and hence i can safely cross multiply)
hence x/y is < 2, aren't there any other #s between 2 and 1, how can i say that x/y is < 1 knwoing that x/y is < 2....NOT SUFF.
1 & 2 together , xy<1 and x/y<2...Can't even be combined...NO LUCK...NOT SUFF.
ANSWER "E"
Regards, Murali. Kudos?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. Big Fat Panda
Status: Biting Nails Into Oblivion
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1859
Followers: 293
Kudos [?]:
1114
[0], given: 194
|
Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
06 Dec 2010, 07:52
Ah, thanks Bunuel. The sign conversion was what tripped me up. Forgot to read the part that said they were negative numbers; should pay more attention.
@Murali: Good trick!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 32
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 25
|
Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
06 Dec 2010, 22:48
Bunuel, I was wondering about the -.2 and -1 and the -1.1 and -.6. Did you use these particular figures for a purpose or were they just easy numbers you knew configured into a number less than 1. Allowing you to make M as big as possible then M as small as possible?
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club team member
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 11515
Followers: 1791
Kudos [?]:
9533
[0], given: 826
|
Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
07 Dec 2010, 05:19
mmcooley33 wrote: Bunuel, I was wondering about the -.2 and -1 and the -1.1 and -.6. Did you use these particular figures for a purpose or were they just easy numbers you knew configured into a number less than 1. Allowing you to make M as big as possible then M as small as possible? Question asks is \frac{m}{n}<1? or is m>n? From (1) we have: 0<mn<1, which is useless (whether alone or combined with 2) to answer which variable is greater. From (2) we have: \frac{m}{n}<2, so \frac{m}{n} is less than 2 but we can not say whether it's less than 1, so again this statement is useless to answer the question. So even not testing the numbers we could say that the answer is E. But to show this, to demonstrate that the answer is E I just picked 2 sets of numbers, first set m>n and the second m<n, also with little trial and error it's not hard to get the numbers to satisfy stem and the statements (remember on DS questions when plugging numbers, goal is to prove that the statement is not sufficient. So we should try to get a YES answer with one chosen number(s) and a NO with another).
_________________
PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!
RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory
COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. NEW!!!
DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set. NEW!!!
 What are GMAT Club Tests? 25 extra-hard Quant Tests
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 02 Oct 2012
Posts: 2
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 1
|
First Post, Inequality Question [#permalink]
10 Jan 2013, 01:20
Question from Total GMAT Math inequality section: If m and n are negative, is m/n less than 1? 1) mn < 1 2) m - n > n I can't for the life of me reason through this one. Plz help experts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Posts: 413
Followers: 23
Kudos [?]:
193
[0], given: 171
|
Re: First Post, Inequality Question [#permalink]
10 Jan 2013, 01:52
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club team member
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 11515
Followers: 1791
Kudos [?]:
9533
[0], given: 826
|
Re: First Post, Inequality Question [#permalink]
10 Jan 2013, 05:26
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 15 Mar 2012
Posts: 41
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 12
|
Re: Can anyone answer this DS question? [#permalink]
14 Feb 2013, 15:17
rite2deepti wrote: Hi bunuel,
I could not understand statement 2 ; m>2n you have taken m=-3 and n =-2 this makes -3>-4 which will be 3<4 true and in second case you have taken m=-3 and n=-4 this will make -3>-8 3<8this is also true ..i could not understand Pleas explain rite2deepti, I thought the same, but you have to look at the question itself m>n? Plugging m = -3 and n = -2 this yields -3 > -4 which is correct, however, the question is -3>-2 and this is incorrect, thats why its a NO. For the second case m = -3 and n = -4 this yields -3 > -8 which is correct, and YES as an answer -3>-4. Having this, we can conclude its INSUFFICIENT, NO AND YES.
_________________
MV "Better to fight for something than live for nothing.” ― George S. Patton Jr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Can anyone answer this DS question?
[#permalink]
14 Feb 2013, 15:17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|