Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Re: If m, p, and t are positive integers and m<p<t, is the [#permalink]
26 May 2010, 04:25
8
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was BOOKMARKED
Pkit wrote:
DS , Q. 76 page 313
If m, p, and t are positive integers and m < p < t, is the product mpt an even integer? (1) t – p = p – m (2) t – m = 16
My solution is: (1) t+m=2p ->, \((t+m)/2=p\), p can not be odd since: if t and m are even, then p is even , keep in mind that m < p < t, \(m<>t\) if t and m are odd, p is even, keep in mind that m < p < t, \(m<>t\),[(5+11)/2=8, but (5+5)/2=5 odd,but m<>t] if t is even and m is odd, then p can not be odd , since (even+odd)/2 must give us integer, so P could not be odd, thus it is even.
Then we know that P must be even, so either of results m*t when multiplied by even number P give us Even product, so the product m*p*t= even Sufficient.
If m, p, and t are positive integers and m < p < t, is the product mpt an even integer?
For \(mpt\) to be even at least one should be even (as m, p, and t are integers).
(1) \(t-p=p-m\) --> \(\frac{t+m}{2}=p\) --> this algebraic expression means that \(p\) is halfway between \(t\) and \(m\) on the number line: \(----m-------p-------t----\)
So m, p, and t are evenly spaced. Does this imply that any integer must be even? Not necessarily. If \(p\) is odd and \(m\) and \(t\) are some even constant below and above it, then all three will be odd. So we can have an YES as well as a NO answer. For example: If \(m=1\), \(p=3\), \(t=5\) the answer is NO; If \(m=2\), \(p=4\), \(t=6\) the answer is YES.
Not sufficient.
(2) \(t-m=16\). Clearly not sufficient. No info about \(p\).
(1)+(2) Second statement says that the distance between \(m\) and \(t\) is 16, so as from (1) \(m\), \(p\), and \(t\) are evenly spaced, then the distance between \(m\) and \(p\) and the distance between\(p\) and \(t\) must 8. But again we can have two different answers:
Re: If m, p, and t are positive integers and m<p<t, is the [#permalink]
19 Jan 2012, 02:21
Expert's post
Yes, number properties theory is simple but its application can get really tricky. The worst thing is that you don't even realize that there was a trick in the question and that you have messed up! You might very confidently mark A here and move on! This is a perfect example of trickery of number properties on GMAT. _________________
Re: If m, p, and t are positive integers and m<p<t, is the [#permalink]
23 Jan 2012, 05:29
Ok this is my take, take statement 1, t+m/2= p which means that t+m/2 equals an integer and the only way that is possible is when t+m are either both odd or both even since if they are odd and even that doesn't given an integer. Secondly, if t+m is either both odd or both even the result will be even hence p= even. But statement 1 insufficient because we dont know whether t+m are both odd or even.
There BCE Now let's take statement 2
We have no information about p so insufficient. Hence CE Now both statements taken together We still can't conclude that t and m are either odd or even since that will determine whether the product is even. So E. Do let me know if my solution makes sense to people.
Re: If m, p, and t are positive integers and m<p<t, is the [#permalink]
27 Mar 2012, 09:46
2
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
andih wrote:
Hey!
I need help with this one.
It's obvious that each statement alone is not sufficient, but I'm struggling with both statements together not sufficient.
From (1) we know that p=(t+m)/2 From (2) we know that t-m=16 -> following this info, you can say that either both t and m are even or both are odd.
Now putting it together, since t+m will be even and and saying that (t+m)/2 will be even, too, we can say that it will be even?!?!
We need to find whether at least one of m, p and t is even.
S1: p = (t+m)/2 tells us that (t+m) is even since p has to be integer. So all we know is that t and m are both either odd or both even (since their sum is even). It doesn't say anything about p i.e. whether p is even or odd. p could be odd e.g. (4+2)/2 = 3 or (5+1)/2 = 3 or it could be even e.g. (8+4)/2 = 6 or (7+5)/2 = 6 etc.
S2: t - m = 16 tells us that t and m are either both odd or both even (because the difference between them is even).We again don't know whether they are even. e.g. 18 - 2 = 16 or 17 - 1 = 16. We also don't know whether p is even.
Using both statements, 2p = t+m, 16 = t - m. Add them to get p+8 = t. If t is odd, p is also odd. If t is even, p is also even. So basically, all 3 variables are either odd or all three are even. But we do not know whether they are even. Hence not sufficient. Answer (E) _________________
Re: If m, p, and t are positive integers and m<p<t, is the [#permalink]
03 Dec 2012, 06:27
Bunuel wrote:
Pkit wrote:
DS , Q. 76 page 313
If m, p, and t are positive integers and m < p < t, is the product mpt an even integer? (1) t – p = p – m (2) t – m = 16
My solution is: (1) t+m=2p ->, \((t+m)/2=p\), p can not be odd since: if t and m are even, then p is even , keep in mind that m < p < t, \(m<>t\) if t and m are odd, p is even, keep in mind that m < p < t, \(m<>t\),[(5+11)/2=8, but (5+5)/2=5 odd,but m<>t] if t is even and m is odd, then p can not be odd , since (even+odd)/2 must give us integer, so P could not be odd, thus it is even.
Then we know that P must be even, so either of results m*t when multiplied by even number P give us Even product, so the product m*p*t= even Sufficient.
If m, p, and t are positive integers and m < p < t, is the product mpt an even integer?
For \(mpt\) to be even at least one should be even (as m, p, and t are integers).
(1) \(t-p=p-m\) --> \(\frac{t+m}{2}=p\) --> this algebraic expression means that \(p\) is halfway between \(t\) and \(m\) on the number line: \(----m-------p-------t----\)
So m, p, and t are evenly spaced. Does this imply that any integer must be even? Not necessarily. If \(p\) is odd and \(m\) and \(t\) are some even constant below and above it, then all three will be odd. So we can have an YES as well as a NO answer. For example: If \(m=1\), \(p=3\), \(t=5\) the answer is NO; If \(m=2\), \(p=4\), \(t=6\) the answer is YES.
Not sufficient.
(2) \(t-m=16\). Clearly not sufficient. No info about \(p\).
(1)+(2) Second statement says that the distance between \(m\) and \(t\) is 16, so as from (1) \(m\), \(p\), and \(t\) are evenly spaced, then the distance between \(m\) and \(p\) and the distance between\(p\) and \(t\) must 8. But again we can have two different answers:
Re: If m, p, and t are positive integers and m<p<t, is the [#permalink]
03 Dec 2012, 06:38
1
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
Maxswe wrote:
Bunuel, great explanation but in my humble opinion I don't think you can take m=0 since it says that m p and t are positive integer
Correct, but it does not affect the answer. Consider: \(m=2\), \(p=10\), \(t=18\) --> \(mpt=even\); \(m=1\), \(p=9\), \(t=17\) --> \(mpt=odd\). _________________
Re: If m, p, and t are positive integers and m<p<t, is the [#permalink]
08 Dec 2012, 00:34
1
This post received KUDOS
imk wrote:
Hi,
Can someone help me find where I'm wrong in solving the following Q:
Q: If m,p and t are positive integers and m<p<t, is the product mpt an even integer? 1. t-p=p-m 2. t-m= 16
O.A (E)
My interpretation:
Q: For "mpt" to be an even integer atleast one of the three numbers should be even. to find if any one of m,p or t is even.
1. t-p=p-m
so, t+m=2p t+m/2 = p
if t+m is divisible by 2 and results in an integer 'p', then 'p' has to be a multiple of '2' which is even. hence 'mpt' should be even. SUFFICIENT
we are down to Options A or D.
2. t-m=16.
this only says the diff of t and m is even. so t and m are either both 'odd' or both 'even'. INSUFFICIENT.
So the correct Answer ( in my opinion) is A.
kindly advise.
Hi. please post the OA inside the spoilers to give other a fair shot at the problem. Thanks.
you have said -> "if t+m is divisible by 2 and results in an integer 'p', then 'p' has to be a multiple of '2' which is even. hence 'mpt' should be even. SUFFICIENT"
P can or cannot be a multiple of 2, t+m is a multiple of 2. Take t=3 m =3 then t+m = 6, which is multiple of 2, and p can be 3 so that t+m = 2 (p) = 3+3 = 2 * 3 tmp = odd if we take t = m = 6 then tmp = Even t+m = 2p then only 2 things we can deduct both t and m are both odd or Even, as E+O would result in Odd,which cannot be a multiple of 2
Re: If m, p, and t are positive integers and m<p<t, is the [#permalink]
08 Dec 2012, 00:41
Thank you. How silly of me to miss that point. I was thinking of the odd numerator and totally wiped out the possibility that even/even can be an odd integer. btw point noted. this is my first post. Sorry that I gave the answer away.
Re: If m, p, and t are positive integers and m<p<t, is the [#permalink]
17 Feb 2014, 01:00
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________
Re: If m, p, and t are positive integers and m<p<t, is the [#permalink]
05 Jul 2014, 00:23
f m, p, and t are positive integers and m < p < t, is the product mpt an even integer?
For mpt to be even at least one should be even (as m, p, and t are integers).
(1) t-p=p-m --> \frac{t+m}{2}=p --> this algebraic expression means that p is halfway between t and m on the number line: ----m-------p-------t----
So m, p, and t are evenly spaced. Does this imply that any integer must be even? Not necessarily. If p is odd and m and t are some even constant below and above it, then all three will be odd. So we can have an YES as well as a NO answer. For example: If m=1, p=3, t=5 the answer is NO; If m=2, p=4, t=6 the answer is YES.
Not sufficient.
(2) t-m=16. Clearly not sufficient. No info about p.
(1)+(2) Second statement says that the distance between m and t is 16, so as from (1) m, p, and t are evenly spaced, then the distance between m and p and the distance betweenp and t must 8. But again we can have two different answers:
Re: If m, p, and t are positive integers and m<p<t, is the [#permalink]
06 Jul 2014, 05:14
h2polo wrote:
If m, p, and t are positive integers and m<p<t, is the product mpt an even integer?
(1) t - p = p - m (2) t - m = 16
1) t-m = 2p or t-m = even so, t,m = (even,even) or (odd,odd) and p can be even or odd so A alone is not sufficient.
2) t-m = 16 t,m = (17,1) or (18,2) .... again the same condition and p is unknown. so B alone is also insufficient.
(1)+(2) t+m = 2p t-m = 16 solving; t-p = 8 t,p = (100,92) or (101,93) ... when (t,p) = (100,92) then m = even and m*t*p = even when (t,p) = (101,93) then m = odd and m*t*p = odd hence (1)+(2) also is insufficient.
Therefore, answer is E.
------------------ +1 if you liked my solution. Tx. _________________
Re: If m, p, and t are positive integers and m<p<t, is the [#permalink]
15 Aug 2014, 22:58
Bunuel wrote:
Pkit wrote:
DS , Q. 76 page 313
If m, p, and t are positive integers and m < p < t, is the product mpt an even integer? (1) t – p = p – m (2) t – m = 16
My solution is: (1) t+m=2p ->, \((t+m)/2=p\), p can not be odd since: if t and m are even, then p is even , keep in mind that m < p < t, \(m<>t\) if t and m are odd, p is even, keep in mind that m < p < t, \(m<>t\),[(5+11)/2=8, but (5+5)/2=5 odd,but m<>t] if t is even and m is odd, then p can not be odd , since (even+odd)/2 must give us integer, so P could not be odd, thus it is even.
Then we know that P must be even, so either of results m*t when multiplied by even number P give us Even product, so the product m*p*t= even Sufficient.
If m, p, and t are positive integers and m < p < t, is the product mpt an even integer?
For \(mpt\) to be even at least one should be even (as m, p, and t are integers).
(1) \(t-p=p-m\) --> \(\frac{t+m}{2}=p\) --> this algebraic expression means that \(p\) is halfway between \(t\) and \(m\) on the number line: \(----m-------p-------t----\)
So m, p, and t are evenly spaced. Does this imply that any integer must be even? Not necessarily. If \(p\) is odd and \(m\) and \(t\) are some even constant below and above it, then all three will be odd. So we can have an YES as well as a NO answer. For example: If \(m=1\), \(p=3\), \(t=5\) the answer is NO; If \(m=2\), \(p=4\), \(t=6\) the answer is YES.
Not sufficient.
(2) \(t-m=16\). Clearly not sufficient. No info about \(p\).
(1)+(2) Second statement says that the distance between \(m\) and \(t\) is 16, so as from (1) \(m\), \(p\), and \(t\) are evenly spaced, then the distance between \(m\) and \(p\) and the distance between\(p\) and \(t\) must 8. But again we can have two different answers:
The “3 golden nuggets” of MBA admission process With ten years of experience helping prospective students with MBA admissions and career progression, I will be writing this blog through...
You know what’s worse than getting a ding at one of your dreams schools . Yes its getting that horrid wait-listed email . This limbo is frustrating as hell . Somewhere...