Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: If m, p, s and v are positive, and m/p<s/v, which of the fol [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Sep 2013, 07:31

29

This post received KUDOS

17

This post was BOOKMARKED

imhimanshu wrote:

If m, p, s and v are positive, and \(\frac{m}{p} <\frac{s}{v}\), which of the following must be between \(\frac{m}{p}\) and \(\frac{s}{v}\)

I. \(\frac{m+s}{p+v}\) II. \(\frac{ms}{pv}\) III. \(\frac{s}{v} - \frac{m}{p}\)

A. None B. I only C. II only D. III only E. I and II both

Given that \(\frac{m}{p}<\frac{s}{v} \to \frac{m}{s}<\frac{p}{v}\)Adding 1 on both sides we have \(\frac{m+s}{s}<\frac{p+v}{v} \to \frac{m+s}{p+v}<\frac{s}{v}\)

Again,\(\frac{m}{p}<\frac{s}{v} \to \frac{v}{p}<\frac{s}{m}\) Adding 1 on both sides, we have \(\frac{v+p}{p}<\frac{s+m}{m} \to \frac{m}{p}<\frac{s+m}{v+p}\) . Thus, I is always true. We just have to check for Option II now.

Assming it to be true, we should have\(\frac{ms}{pv}<\frac{s}{v} \to \frac{m}{p}<1\) Which is not always true. Thus the answer is B.
_________________

Re: If m, p, s and v are positive, and m/p<s/v, which of the fol [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Sep 2013, 00:37

igotthis wrote:

How can I solve this using numbers?

You can take numbers such 1,2,3 and 4 as m,p,s and v find the value between m/p and s/v try to enter the numbers in the answer choices. only option B will satisfy .

If m, p, s and v are positive, and \(\frac{m}{p} <\frac{s}{v}\), which of the following must be between \(\frac{m}{p}\) and \(\frac{s}{v}\)

I. \(\frac{m+s}{p+v}\) II. \(\frac{ms}{pv}\) III. \(\frac{s}{v} - \frac{m}{p}\)

A. None B. I only C. II only D. III only E. I and II both

Responding to a pm:

You can work on this question using some number line and averaging concepts. Let's look at statement II and III first since they are very easy.

We know \(\frac{m}{p} <\frac{s}{v}\)

On the number line: .............0....................m/p ........................s/v (since m, p, s and v are all positive so m/p and s/v are to the right of 0)

II. \(\frac{ms}{pv}\) Think of the case when m/p and s/v are both less than 1. When you multiply them, they will become even smaller. Say .2*.3 = .06. So the product may not lie between them.

III. \(\frac{s}{v} - \frac{m}{p}\) Think of a case such as this: .............0..............................m/p .......s/v \(\frac{s}{v} - \frac{m}{p}\) will be much smaller than both m/p and s/v and will lie somewhere here: .............0.......Here...........................m/p .......s/v So it needn't be between them.

Now only issue is (I). You can check some numbers for it including fractions and non fractions. Or try to understand it using number line. Think of 4 numbers as N1, N2, D1, D2 for ease and given fractions as N1/D1 and N2/D2.

\(\frac{m+s}{p+v} = \frac{m+s/2}{p+v/2}\) = (Avg of N1 and N2)/(Avg of D1 and D2)

Now numerator of avg will lie between N1 and N2 and denominator of avg will lie between D1 and D2. So Avg N/Avg D will lie between N1/D1 and N2/D2. Try to think this through.

If N1/D1 < N2/D2, it could be because N1 < N2 and D1 = D2. So AvgN will lie between N1 and N2 and AvgD = D1 = D2. It could also be because N1 < N2 and D1 > D2. AvgN will be larger than N1 but smaller than N2. AvgD will be smaller than D1 but greater than D2 so AvgN/AvgD will be greater than N1/D1 but smaller than N2/D2. It could also be because N1 << N2 and D1 < D2 i.e. N1 is much smaller than N2 as compared to D1 to D2. It could be because N1=N2 but D1>D2. Again, AvgD will lie between D1 and D2 and AvgN = N1 = N2. It could also be because N1 > N2 but D1 >> D2. Take some numbers to understand why this makes sense.
_________________

Re: If m, p, s and v are positive, and m/p<s/v, which of the fol [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Nov 2013, 00:08

1

This post received KUDOS

rahultripathi2005 wrote:

igotthis wrote:

How can I solve this using numbers?

You can take numbers such 1,2,3 and 4 as m,p,s and v find the value between m/p and s/v try to enter the numbers in the answer choices. only option B will satisfy .

Thanks Rahul

Hi,

I make the plug in as follows but it does not work: 1/2 < 3/4

1. (1+3)/(2+4) = 4/6 = 2/3 so in between 2. (1*3)/(2*4) = 3/8 less than 1/2 3. (3-1)/(4-2) = 1 > 3/4

So this problem cannot solve by using plugin?? Please help to correct me if I went wrong.

I make the plug in as follows but it does not work: 1/2 < 3/4

1. (1+3)/(2+4) = 4/6 = 2/3 so in between 2. (1*3)/(2*4) = 3/8 less than 1/2 3. (3-1)/(4-2) = 1 > 3/4

So this problem cannot solve by using plugin?? Please help to correct me if I went wrong.

Thanks!

Statement 3 is (s/v) - (m/p) When you take values as 1, 2, 3 and 4, it becomes (3/4) - (1/2) = 1/4 (This is not between 1/2 and 3/4 and hence you know that statement 3 may not hold always)

Plugging in numbers is not the best strategy for 'must be true' questions. You know that statement 1 holds for these particular values of m , p, s and v (1, 2, 3 and 4) but how do you know that it will be true for every set of valid values of m, p, s and v? You cannot try every set. You can certainly ignore statements II and III since you have already got values for which they are not satisfied. But you must focus more on statement I and try to figure out using logic whether it must always hold.
_________________

which of the following 'must be' between m/p and s/v?

I didn't understand the question. What does the question mean here by 'must be'?

"Must be" means for any (possible) values of m, p, s and v. So, \(\frac{m}{p}< (option) <\frac{s}{v}\), must hold true fo any positive values of m, p, s and v.

Re: If m, p, s and v are positive, and m/p<s/v, which of the fol [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Apr 2014, 09:45

Bunuel wrote:

siriusblack1106 wrote:

which of the following 'must be' between m/p and s/v?

I didn't understand the question. What does the question mean here by 'must be'?

"Must be" means for any (possible) values of m, p, s and v. So, \(\frac{m}{p}< (option) <\frac{s}{v}\), must hold true fo any positive values of m, p, s and v.

m, p, s, and v are positive and m/p < s/v [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 May 2014, 09:51

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

If \(m\), \(p\), \(s\), and \(v\) are positive and \(\frac{m}{p}\) \(<\) \(\frac{s}{v}\), which of the following must be between \(\frac{m}{p}\) and \(\frac{s}{v}\)?

1 - \(\frac{m+s}{p+v}\)

2 - \(\frac{ms}{pv}\)

3 - \(\frac{s}{v} - \frac{m}{p}\)

A - None B - 1 only C - 2 only D - 3 only E - 1 & 2

Last edited by dxx on 17 May 2014, 10:38, edited 2 times in total.

Re: m, p, s, and v are positive and m/p < s/v [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 May 2014, 09:52

I couldn't get my head around this one, so I used numbers:

\(\frac{m}{p}\) = \(\frac{1}{2}\) and \(\frac{s}{v}\) = \(\frac{3}{4}\)

This fulfils the condition that \(\frac{m}{p}\) \(<\) \(\frac{s}{v}\)

Now,

\(\frac{m+s}{p+v}\) is \(\frac{1+3}{2+4}\) \(=\)\(\frac{4}{6}\) \(=\)\(\frac{2}{3}\), so sufficient as it is between \(\frac{1}{2}\) and \(\frac{3}{4}\).

\(\frac{ms}{pv}\) is \(\frac{1*3}{2*4} = \frac{3}{8}\), which is less than \(\frac{1}{2}\), so not sufficient

\(\frac{s}{v} - \frac{m}{p}\) is \(\frac{3}{4}-\frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{4}\), which is less than \(\frac{1}{2}\), so not sufficient

Answer is B (1 only).

Is this approach suitable for such questions? Both in terms of accuracy and time: is this valid solution valid for all fractions and is there a faster way to solve this?

If \(m\), \(p\), \(s\), and \(v\) are positive and \(\frac{m}{p}\) \(<\) \(\frac{s}{v}\), which of the following must be between \(\frac{m}{p}\) and \(\frac{s}{v}\)?

1 - \(\frac{m+s}{p+v}\)

2 - \(\frac{ms}{pv}\)

3 - \(\frac{s}{v} - \frac{m}{p}\)

A - None B - 1 only C - 2 only D - 3 only E - 1 & 2

Merging similar topics. Please refer to the discussion above.
_________________

I couldn't get my head around this one, so I used numbers:

\(\frac{m}{p}\) = \(\frac{1}{2}\) and \(\frac{s}{v}\) = \(\frac{3}{4}\)

This fulfils the condition that \(\frac{m}{p}\) \(<\) \(\frac{s}{v}\)

Now,

\(\frac{m+s}{p+v}\) is \(\frac{1+3}{2+4}\) \(=\)\(\frac{4}{6}\) \(=\)\(\frac{2}{3}\), so sufficient as it is between \(\frac{1}{2}\) and \(\frac{3}{4}\).

\(\frac{ms}{pv}\) is \(\frac{1*3}{2*4} = \frac{3}{8}\), which is less than \(\frac{1}{2}\), so not sufficient

\(\frac{s}{v} - \frac{m}{p}\) is \(\frac{3}{4}-\frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{4}\), which is less than \(\frac{1}{2}\), so not sufficient

Answer is B (1 only).

Is this approach suitable for such questions? Both in terms of accuracy and time: is this valid solution valid for all fractions and is there a faster way to solve this?

Re: If m, p, s and v are positive, and m/p<s/v, which of the fol [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Apr 2015, 14:25

10

This post received KUDOS

mau5 wrote:

imhimanshu wrote:

If m, p, s and v are positive, and \(\frac{m}{p} <\frac{s}{v}\), which of the following must be between \(\frac{m}{p}\) and \(\frac{s}{v}\)

I. \(\frac{m+s}{p+v}\) II. \(\frac{ms}{pv}\) III. \(\frac{s}{v} - \frac{m}{p}\)

A. None B. I only C. II only D. III only E. I and II both

Given that \(\frac{m}{p}<\frac{s}{v} \to \frac{m}{s}<\frac{p}{v}\)Adding 1 on both sides we have \(\frac{m+s}{s}<\frac{p+v}{v} \to \frac{m+s}{p+v}<\frac{s}{v}\)

Again,\(\frac{m}{p}<\frac{s}{v} \to \frac{v}{p}<\frac{s}{m}\) Adding 1 on both sides, we have \(\frac{v+p}{p}<\frac{s+m}{m} \to \frac{m}{p}<\frac{s+m}{v+p}\) . Thus, I is always true. We just have to check for Option II now.

Assming it to be true, we should have\(\frac{ms}{pv}<\frac{s}{v} \to \frac{m}{p}<1\) Which is not always true. Thus the answer is B.

You have the best approach in this thread, but I would never have thought of your solution to #1. I think you made it more complicated than it needed to be.

This is actually a very easy problem once you spend a few moments understanding what you need to do.

You're told the following: 1) m, p, s and v are positive 2) \(\frac{m}{p} <\frac{s}{v}\)

So, you need to know whether each option is both less than \(\frac{s}{v}\) and greater than \(\frac{m}{p}\). That's it. Once that clicks, it's very easy.

I. \(\frac{m+s}{p+v}\)

So part A:

Is \(\frac{m+s}{p+v} < \frac{s}{v}\) ? Is \(mv+sv < sp + sv\) ? Is \(mv < sp\) ? Hmmm, that looks familar. In fact, it's the second thing they gave us: \(\frac{m}{p} <\frac{s}{v}\). So yes!

Part B:

Is \(\frac{m+s}{p+v} > \frac{m}{p}\) ? Is \(mp+sp > mp + mv\) ? Is \(sp > mv\) ? Hmmm, that looks familar too. In fact, it's also the second thing they gave us: \(\frac{m}{p} <\frac{s}{v}\). So yes!

Then you perform the same (quicker) process for II.

If m, p, s and v are positive, and m/p<s/v, which of the fol [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Jun 2015, 10:13

Hi guys,

I got this problem on an exam pack 1 CAT and failed to solve it correctly due to a technical error (DRIVING ME CRAZY). Otherwise I picked numbers and was 99% on the right path. One question I have for you is:

Do you think testing one pari of numbers is enough? I picked 2 pairs: - m=1, p=3, s=3 and v=4 - m=3, p=1, s=4 and v=1

These 2 options are more conservative as I wanted to test these equations for fractions and integers. Do you think this was overkill (question stem says we're talking about positive numbers and not integers)? As far as I can see, all of you tested just one pair of numbers, which of course almost certainly decreases the time needed to solve the problem.

Thanks!
_________________

Thank you very much for reading this post till the end! Kudos?

I got this problem on an exam pack 1 CAT and failed to solve it correctly due to a technical error (DRIVING ME CRAZY). Otherwise I picked numbers and was 99% on the right path. One question I have for you is:

Do you think testing one pari of numbers is enough? I picked 2 pairs: - m=1, p=3, s=3 and v=4 - m=3, p=1, s=4 and v=1

These 2 options are more conservative as I wanted to test these equations for fractions and integers. Do you think this was overkill (question stem says we're talking about positive numbers and not integers)? As far as I can see, all of you tested just one pair of numbers, which of course almost certainly decreases the time needed to solve the problem.

Thanks!

Testing numbers for "must be true" doesn't always work. One set of values could help you establish that statements II and III do not hold. But how can you PROVE that statement I will always hold just because it holds for one set of values? You do need to establish algebraically or logically that it will hold.

Then I. = 0.3, which is between the two values Then II. = 0.05, which is not between the two values Then III. = -0.05, which is not between the two values
_________________

Saving was yesterday, heat up the gmatclub.forum's sentiment by spending KUDOS!

PS Please send me PM if I do not respond to your question within 24 hours.

gmatclubot

Re: If m, p, s and v are positive, and m/p<s/v, which of the fol
[#permalink]
19 Sep 2015, 03:43

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...