Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Oct 2014, 16:09

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Jun 2008
Posts: 11
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [1] , given: 0

If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0? [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2008, 10:44
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (02:01) correct 43% (01:44) wrong based on 58 sessions
If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?

(1) m < p
(2) m < 0

OPEN DISCUSSION OF THIS QUESTION IS HERE: if-mv-pv-0-is-v-134718.html
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by Bunuel on 10 Jan 2014, 02:08, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic, edited the question and added the OA.
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2008
Posts: 45
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Quant - DS from Gmatprep - inequality.. [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2008, 11:09
Answer is B.

In case 2,

As we know mv < pv <0

so mv < 0.

so v > 0 as m < 0 ( option 2).

It is more than enough to say that v > 0.

So B alone is sufficient.

In case 1,

m < p now if v is -vs then both m and p has to be +ve.

and if v is +ve then both m and p has to -ve.

So we can't tell whether v is +ve or -ve.

so A is not sufficient.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 280
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Re: Quant - DS from Gmatprep - inequality.. [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2008, 11:18
onesome68 wrote:
DS question from Gmatprep - please provide explanation with answers:

if mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
(1) m < p
(2) m < 0


I believe it is D.

Case 1) m < p
mv < pv < 0
mv - pv < pv - pv < -pv ...subtract pv
v(m-p) < 0 < -pv

Since m < p OR (m - p) < 0 Therefore, v must be positive. SUFF

Case 2) m < 0
Since mv < 0 (given), v must be positive. SUFF
3 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 243
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 60 [3] , given: 0

Re: Quant - DS from Gmatprep - inequality.. [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2008, 11:32
3
This post received
KUDOS
IMO D.

if mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
(1) m < p

= > now if we mutiply both sides by a +ve number, then the inequality sign remains same and if we multiply both sides witha -ve number, the inequality sign changes.
as the sign remains same, after multiplying by V (mv < pv ) , so V >0

(2) m < 0

if v is -ve mv >0 and if v is +ve mv <0 ; as mv < 0 , v >0
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1829
Location: New York
Followers: 27

Kudos [?]: 472 [0], given: 5

Re: Quant - DS from Gmatprep - inequality.. [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2008, 11:32
devilmirror wrote:
onesome68 wrote:
DS question from Gmatprep - please provide explanation with answers:

if mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
(1) m < p
(2) m < 0


I believe it is D.

Case 1) m < p
mv < pv < 0
mv - pv < pv - pv < -pv ...subtract pv
v(m-p) < 0 < -pv

Since m < p OR (m - p) < 0 Therefore, v must be positive. SUFF

Case 2) m < 0
Since mv < 0 (given), v must be positive. SUFF



Hey devilmirror,

Agree with you. It should be D.. Little Tricky one.

if mv < pv < 0,

1) m<p suffcient.
mv-pv<0 --> v(m-p)<0
given m<p --> m-p<0 and v+ve

2 ) suffcient.

D
_________________

Your attitude determines your altitude
Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Jun 2008
Posts: 11
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: Quant - DS from Gmatprep - inequality.. [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2008, 13:14
OA is D only ..
Thanks to all for the explanation..
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1435
Followers: 35

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 1

Re: Quant - DS from Gmatprep - inequality.. [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2008, 17:21
ssandeepan wrote:
IMO D.

if mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
(1) m < p

= > now if we mutiply both sides by a +ve number, then the inequality sign remains same and if we multiply both sides witha -ve number, the inequality sign changes.
as the sign remains same, after multiplying by V (mv < pv ) , so V >0

(2) m < 0

if v is -ve mv >0 and if v is +ve mv <0 ; as mv < 0 , v >0


Excellent point about the inequality and sign change you brought up.

Even if we take part of the original inequality mv < pv we still have v(m-p) < 0 and we know that m < p. So V has to be +ve.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1551
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 236 [0], given: 1

Re: Quant - DS from Gmatprep - inequality.. [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2008, 18:29
onesome68 wrote:
DS question from Gmatprep - please provide explanation with answers:

if mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
(1) m < p
(2) m < 0



First of all, since mv < pv, we know that pv - mv > 0, therefore v(p-m) > 0. So whatever is the sign for (p-m), it should be the same as that of v so that their product remains positive:

(1) m < p, therefore p-m > 0, so if this is positive, then v is positive. Suff.

(2) m is negative, since the product of mv from the question is negative, v must be positive.

Answer is D.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Jun 2010
Posts: 37
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 5

Re: Quant - DS from Gmatprep - inequality.. [#permalink] New post 26 Feb 2011, 12:34
ssandeepan wrote:
IMO D.

if mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
(1) m < p

= > now if we mutiply both sides by a +ve number, then the inequality sign remains same and if we multiply both sides witha -ve number, the inequality sign changes.
as the sign remains same, after multiplying by V (mv < pv ) , so V >0

(2) m < 0

if v is -ve mv >0 and if v is +ve mv <0 ; as mv < 0 , v >0


There are various ways to solve this questions. I took the longer route of picking values for variables which helped me avoid mistake I would usually make in 'visualizing' inequalities. Although you could reach the same conclusion by solving the inequalities by subtracting a term (and thus avoiding the flipping of inequality sign required when multiplying/dividing with a -ve variable), the solution you provides is just excellent. A simple observation of the original question and the first statement already saves a ton of calculations and mistakes. Valuable point! Kudos!
_________________

-DK
---------------------------------------------------------
If you like what you read then give a Kudos! :-)
Diagnostic Test: 620
The past is a guidepost, not a hitching post.
---------------------------------------------------------

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 2858
Followers: 207

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: if mv < pv < 0, is v > 0? (1) m < p (2) m < 0 [#permalink] New post 09 Jan 2014, 19:22
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

GMAT Books | GMAT Club Tests | Best Prices on GMAT Courses | GMAT Mobile App | Math Resources | Verbal Resources

Expert Post
Math Expert
User avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 23409
Followers: 3613

Kudos [?]: 28917 [0], given: 2871

Re: If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0? [#permalink] New post 10 Jan 2014, 02:09
Expert's post
If mv < pv< 0, is v > 0?

Given: mv<pv<0 --> two cases:

If v>0 then when dividing by v we would have: m<p<0;
If v<0 then when dividing by v we would have: m>p>0 (flip the sign when dividing by negative value).

(1) m < p --> we have the first case, so v>0. Sufficient.
(2) m < 0 --> we have the first case, so v>0. Sufficient.

Answer: D.

OPEN DISCUSSION OF THIS QUESTION IS HERE: if-mv-pv-0-is-v-134718.html
_________________

NEW TO MATH FORUM? PLEASE READ THIS: ALL YOU NEED FOR QUANT!!!

PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!

RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory; 7. Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets; 9. PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders; 11. GMAT Prep Software Analysis NEW!!!; 12. SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) NEW!!!; 12. Tricky questions from previous years. NEW!!!;

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
25 extra-hard Quant Tests

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Re: If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?   [#permalink] 10 Jan 2014, 02:09
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
33 Experts publish their posts in the topic If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0? Stiv 7 20 Jun 2012, 01:53
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic If mv < pv< 0, is v > 0? enigma123 5 20 May 2012, 13:14
If mv<pv<0 is v>0? buckkitty 4 24 Feb 2007, 16:35
If mv < pv < 0, is v>0? 1) m < p 2) m < 0 lfox2 4 20 Dec 2006, 05:14
If mv<pv<0 , is v > 0 ? (1) m < p (2) m < 0 copper_waters 1 16 Feb 2006, 05:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by

If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.