Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

If n = 20! + 17, then n is divisible by which of the following?

I. 15 II. 17 III. 19

(A) None (B) I only (C) II only (D) I and II (E) II and II

20! is the product of all integers from 1 to 20, inclusive, thus it's divisible by each of the integers 15, 17, and 19.

Next, notice that we can factor out 17 from from 20! + 17, thus 20! + 17 is divisible by 17 but we cannot factor out neither 15 nor 19 from 20! + 17, thus 20! + 17 is not divisible by either of them.

Answer: C.

GENERALLY: If integers \(a\) and \(b\) are both multiples of some integer \(k>1\) (divisible by \(k\)), then their sum and difference will also be a multiple of \(k\) (divisible by \(k\)): Example: \(a=6\) and \(b=9\), both divisible by 3 ---> \(a+b=15\) and \(a-b=-3\), again both divisible by 3.

If out of integers \(a\) and \(b\) one is a multiple of some integer \(k>1\) and another is not, then their sum and difference will NOT be a multiple of \(k\) (divisible by \(k\)): Example: \(a=6\), divisible by 3 and \(b=5\), not divisible by 3 ---> \(a+b=11\) and \(a-b=1\), neither is divisible by 3.

If integers \(a\) and \(b\) both are NOT multiples of some integer \(k>1\) (divisible by \(k\)), then their sum and difference may or may not be a multiple of \(k\) (divisible by \(k\)): Example: \(a=5\) and \(b=4\), neither is divisible by 3 ---> \(a+b=9\), is divisible by 3 and \(a-b=1\), is not divisible by 3; OR: \(a=6\) and \(b=3\), neither is divisible by 5 ---> \(a+b=9\) and \(a-b=3\), neither is divisible by 5; OR: \(a=2\) and \(b=2\), neither is divisible by 4 ---> \(a+b=4\) and \(a-b=0\), both are divisible by 4.

Re: If n = 20! + 17, then n is divisible by which of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Apr 2013, 22:07

2

This post received KUDOS

Another crude way to answer this, if you did not know the properties above would be to consider that that 20! will have the number ending in 00 due to 10 and 20 being included.

So n!+17 = xxxx00 +17 = xxxx17 which is only possibly divisible by 17. Hence Option C is the answer.

Re: If n = 20! + 17, then n is divisible by which of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Apr 2013, 22:51

mal208213 wrote:

Another crude way to answer this, if you did not know the properties above would be to consider that that 20! will have the number ending in 00 due to 10 and 20 being included.

So n!+17 = xxxx00 +17 = xxxx17 which is only possibly divisible by 17. Hence Option C is the answer.

Please give Kudos if you found this useful!

Not true. 19*43 = _17. There are bigger numbers ending with 17 and are divisible by 19. By your logic, you can only eliminate 15.
_________________

Re: If n = 20! + 17, then n is divisible by which of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Apr 2013, 23:02

mal208213 wrote:

Another crude way to answer this, if you did not know the properties above would be to consider that that 20! will have the number ending in 00 due to 10 and 20 being included.

So n!+17 = xxxx00 +17 = xxxx17 which is only possibly divisible by 17. Hence Option C is the answer.

Please give Kudos if you found this useful!

This is not true mate.

Consider \(16!\), it has two \(00\) at the end (\(3\) if we want to be precise) but \(16! +17\) => \(xxx17\) is NOT divisible by \(17\)

In order for an \(n!\) to be divisible by \(17\) we have to be able to group/take 17 from both numbers \(17!+34=17(16!+2)\) Divisible by 17 \(17!+35\) Not divisible by 17

Hope this clarifies the concept, let me know
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Re: If n = 20! + 17, then n is divisible by which of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Apr 2013, 09:48

Zarrolou wrote:

mal208213 wrote:

Another crude way to answer this, if you did not know the properties above would be to consider that that 20! will have the number ending in 00 due to 10 and 20 being included.

So n!+17 = xxxx00 +17 = xxxx17 which is only possibly divisible by 17. Hence Option C is the answer.

Please give Kudos if you found this useful!

This is not true mate.

Consider \(16!\), it has two \(00\) at the end (\(3\) if we want to be precise) but \(16! +17\) => \(xxx17\) is NOT divisible by \(17\)

In order for an \(n!\) to be divisible by \(17\) we have to be able to group/take 17 from both numbers \(17!+34=17(16!+2)\) Divisible by 17 \(17!+35\) Not divisible by 17

Hope this clarifies the concept, let me know

Sure Zarroulou and Vinay that definitely clarifies.... Again my method was only in the moment when I found myself taking way too much time to solve this and my solution was at best an estimated guess or "guesstimate"

I totally understood the concept Bunuel!!Thanks a ton for your contribution, but my point is that I got confused with the wordings of the question stem. If it says n is divisible by 17, so that means it should be divisible completely which is not case in this question.So how to check in a question like this that what concept to apply like completely divisible or one of the factor is divisible? Please clarify.Hope you got my point.

Re: If n = 20! + 17, then n is divisible by which of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Jun 2013, 06:00

Bunuel wrote:

Walkabout wrote:

If n = 20! + 17, then n is divisible by which of the following?

I. 15 II. 17 III. 19

(A) None (B) I only (C) II only (D) I and II (E) II and II

20! is the product of all integers from 1 to 20, inclusive, thus it's divisible by each of the integers 15, 17, and 19.

Next, notice that we can factor out 17 from from 20! + 17, thus 20! + 17 is divisible by 17 but we cannot factor out neither 15 nor 19 from 20! + 17, thus 20! + 17 is not divisible by either of them.

Answer: C.

GENERALLY: If integers \(a\) and \(b\) are both multiples of some integer \(k>1\) (divisible by \(k\)), then their sum and difference will also be a multiple of \(k\) (divisible by \(k\)): Example: \(a=6\) and \(b=9\), both divisible by 3 ---> \(a+b=15\) and \(a-b=-3\), again both divisible by 3.

If out of integers \(a\) and \(b\) one is a multiple of some integer \(k>1\) and another is not, then their sum and difference will NOT be a multiple of \(k\) (divisible by \(k\)): Example: \(a=6\), divisible by 3 and \(b=5\), not divisible by 3 ---> \(a+b=11\) and \(a-b=1\), neither is divisible by 3.

If integers \(a\) and \(b\) both are NOT multiples of some integer \(k>1\) (divisible by \(k\)), then their sum and difference may or may not be a multiple of \(k\) (divisible by \(k\)): Example: \(a=5\) and \(b=4\), neither is divisible by 3 ---> \(a+b=9\), is divisible by 3 and \(a-b=1\), is not divisible by 3; OR: \(a=6\) and \(b=3\), neither is divisible by 5 ---> \(a+b=9\) and \(a-b=3\), neither is divisible by 5; OR: \(a=2\) and \(b=2\), neither is divisible by 4 ---> \(a+b=4\) and \(a-b=0\), both are divisible by 4.

Hope it helps.

Please tell me for the multiplication cases as well like you explained about addition & subtraction.

I totally understood the concept Bunuel!!Thanks a ton for your contribution, but my point is that I got confused with the wordings of the question stem. If it says n is divisible by 17, so that means it should be divisible completely which is not case in this question.So how to check in a question like this that what concept to apply like completely divisible or one of the factor is divisible? Please clarify.Hope you got my point.

What do you mean "divisible completely"? There is no such thing.

20!+17 is divisible by 17 means that (20!+17)/17=integer, which is the case here.
_________________

Re: If n = 20! + 17, then n is divisible by which of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Sep 2013, 13:07

Is this type of problem similar to remainder problems? My thinking was that n = 20(n) + 17 with zero remainder, meaning it had to be divisible by 17. If it were divisible by 17, then it was not divisible by 15 or 19. Does that make sense though?
_________________

Is this type of problem similar to remainder problems? My thinking was that n = 20(n) + 17 with zero remainder, meaning it had to be divisible by 17. If it were divisible by 17, then it was not divisible by 15 or 19. Does that make sense though?

I am not sure I understand what you did there.

How do you get n = 20a + 17 has to be divisible by 17? (I am assuming you meant the second variable to be different)

The reason 20! + 17 must be divisible by 17 is that 20! = 1*2*3*4*...17*18*19*20 So 20! is a multiple of 17 and can be written as 17a

n = 17a + 17 is divisible by 17.

Also, a number can be divisible by 17 as well as 15 as well as 19. e.g. n =15*17*19 is divisible by all three. But here n = 20! + 17 in which 20! is divisible by 15 as well as 19 but 17 is neither divisible by 15 nor by 19. So when you divide n by 15, you will get a remainder of 2. When you divide n by 19, you will get a remainder of 17.
_________________

Re: If n = 20! + 17, then n is divisible by which of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Oct 2013, 12:33

I was thinking that n = 20! + 17 -- knowing this you know that 20! is a multiple of all of the numbers 15, 17 and 19, because 20! = 20x19x18x17x16x15...etc.etc.

However by adding 17, the number is no longer a multiple of 15 or 19 because 17 is not divisible by 19 or 15.

i

VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:

TAL010 wrote:

Is this type of problem similar to remainder problems? My thinking was that n = 20(n) + 17 with zero remainder, meaning it had to be divisible by 17. If it were divisible by 17, then it was not divisible by 15 or 19. Does that make sense though?

I am not sure I understand what you did there.

How do you get n = 20a + 17 has to be divisible by 17? (I am assuming you meant the second variable to be different)

The reason 20! + 17 must be divisible by 17 is that 20! = 1*2*3*4*...17*18*19*20 So 20! is a multiple of 17 and can be written as 17a

n = 17a + 17 is divisible by 17.

Also, a number can be divisible by 17 as well as 15 as well as 19. e.g. n =15*17*19 is divisible by all three. But here n = 20! + 17 in which 20! is divisible by 15 as well as 19 but 17 is neither divisible by 15 nor by 19. So when you divide n by 15, you will get a remainder of 2. When you divide n by 19, you will get a remainder of 17.

I was thinking that n = 20! + 17 -- knowing this you know that 20! is a multiple of all of the numbers 15, 17 and 19, because 20! = 20x19x18x17x16x15...etc.etc.

However by adding 17, the number is no longer a multiple of 15 or 19 because 17 is not divisible by 19 or 15.

Yes, this is fine. Note that previously, you had written n = 20a + 17 is divisible by 17. I am assuming the 'a' was a typo.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...