If n and r are positive integers and r is the remainder when : DS Archive
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 20 Jan 2017, 01:05

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If n and r are positive integers and r is the remainder when

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 281
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

If n and r are positive integers and r is the remainder when [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2006, 10:08
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

If n and r are positive integers and r is the remainder when 27 is divided by n, r=?
1). When 20 is divided by n, remainder is 7.
2). When 27 is divided by n, quotient is 2, remainder is r.
VP
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Posts: 1267
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2006, 10:26
Given n, r +ve integers

r = ? if 27 = n * k + r

S1: 20 = n * m + 7

or 13 = n * m

As 13 is prime, m =1, n = 13
or m=13, n = 1
As divisor is greater than remainder (only if the numbers are +ve),

n > 7 => n = 13. Sufficient.

S2: 27 = n * 2 + r
If n = 10, r = 7,
If n = 11, r = 5 .. and so on.
Not sufficient.

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Feb 2004
Posts: 290
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2006, 10:28
will go with D

from st 1. we have n =13
so 27/13 gives r = 1
SUFF

from st2: same as above
SUFF

so D
CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2911
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 24

Kudos [?]: 273 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2006, 10:30
apollo168 wrote:
If n and r are positive integers and r is the remainder when 27 is divided by n, r=?
1). When 20 is divided by n, remainder is 7.
2). When 27 is divided by n, quotient is 2, remainder is r.

Is it A?

Will explain if correct.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 281
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2006, 10:31
Unfortunately no OA was given
CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2911
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 24

Kudos [?]: 273 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2006, 10:42
apollo168 wrote:
Unfortunately no OA was given

OK then I will explain.
IMO its A.

St1:
20 = nx + 7
i.e nx must be 13. So either n = 1 or n = 13. But n must be greater than 7 to get a remainder of 7. So n = 13.
Reaminder of 27/13 = 1: SUFF

St2:
27 = 2n + r
So r must be an odd integer. So
r =1 for n = 13
r = 3 for n = 12
r = 5 for n = 11
r = 7 for n = 10
: INSUFF
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 281
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2006, 10:48
Thanks guys
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5238
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2006, 04:46
ps_dahiya wrote:
apollo168 wrote:
Unfortunately no OA was given

OK then I will explain.
IMO its A.

St1:
20 = nx + 7
i.e nx must be 13. So either n = 1 or n = 13. But n must be greater than 7 to get a remainder of 7. So n = 13.
Reaminder of 27/13 = 1: SUFF

St2:
27 = 2n + r
So r must be an odd integer. So
r =1 for n = 13
r = 3 for n = 12
r = 5 for n = 11
r = 7 for n = 10
: INSUFF

Statement 1 is sufficient as Dahiya has pointed out.

Statement 2, upon closer inspection, is just restating the question. No new information can be attained. What necromonger referred to as "twin trouble." Insuff.

(A)
Manager
Joined: 09 Aug 2005
Posts: 72
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2006, 06:03
I arrived upon A as well but without much of the hassle or even putting in numbers Should've prolly double checked!!!

Acc to the problem statement we have to find r if 27 = nk + r.

Now the first statement gives you 20 = nk + 7, so by substituting nk = 13 in the first statement we can solve for r. (since both should be true for all k). Therefore, SUFF.

In the second statement we get 27 = 2n + r, which is really a specific solution for the problem statement itself - like psdahiya says, no new information. INSUFF.

Hence A.

MG
31 Aug 2006, 06:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# If n and r are positive integers and r is the remainder when

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.