If n is a 27-digit positive integer, all of whose digits are : GMAT Problem Solving (PS)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 18 Jan 2017, 23:44

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If n is a 27-digit positive integer, all of whose digits are

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 20 May 2014
Posts: 39
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 1

If n is a 27-digit positive integer, all of whose digits are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2014, 08:48
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

67% (01:44) correct 33% (00:53) wrong based on 141 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

If n is a 27-digit positive integer, all of whose digits are the same, which of the following must be true?

I. n is divisible by 3
II. n is divisible by 9
III. n is divisible by 27

A. I only
B. I and II only
C. I and III only
D. II and III only
E. I, II and III

Explanation given:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
Suppose n = 111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111. Then the digits of n sum up to 27 * 1, which is divisible by 9, so n is divisible by both 3 and 9 by the basic divisibility rules given in our Arithmetic book. (Any other 27-digit integer with all identical digits is just a multiple of this first one, so we know that all the other values of n will divide by 3 and 9.) We might conclude that the divisibility rule "generalizes", and that any number whose digits sum to a multiple of 27 divides by 27. Be careful, though! This is exact the sort of natural, intuitive thinking that the testwriters like to exploit, so let's see if we can test a number. Suppose n = 111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111. Noticing that 111/3 = 37, we can divide n by 3 and obtain n/3 = 37,037,037,037,037,037,037,037,037. The sum of the digits of this number is 90, so n/3 divides by 9. (n/3)/9 = n/27, so n divides by 27. Since any 27-digit number with one repeating digit is just a multiple of 111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111 -- i.e., a multiple of a multiple of 27 -- we conclude that n is divisible by 27.

CONFUSION :
[Reveal] Spoiler:
DO WE HAVE TO WRITE OUT THE WHOLE NUMBER? IS THERE ANOTHER WAY TO SOLVE? ALSO WHY DO WE DIVIDE 111 by 3? AND THEN HOW DO WE GET TO n/3 = 37,037,037,037,037,037,037,037,037?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by Bunuel on 23 Jul 2014, 08:55, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question.
Director
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Posts: 728
Location: India
GPA: 3.21
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 695 [0], given: 723

Re: If n is a 27-digit positive integer, all of whose digits are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2014, 23:19
sagnik2422 wrote:
If n is a 27-digit positive integer, all of whose digits are the same, which of the following must be true?

I. n is divisible by 3
II. n is divisible by 9
III. n is divisible by 27

A. I only
B. I and II only
C. I and III only
D. II and III only
E. I, II and III

Explanation given:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
Suppose n = 111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111. Then the digits of n sum up to 27 * 1, which is divisible by 9, so n is divisible by both 3 and 9 by the basic divisibility rules given in our Arithmetic book. (Any other 27-digit integer with all identical digits is just a multiple of this first one, so we know that all the other values of n will divide by 3 and 9.) We might conclude that the divisibility rule "generalizes", and that any number whose digits sum to a multiple of 27 divides by 27. Be careful, though! This is exact the sort of natural, intuitive thinking that the testwriters like to exploit, so let's see if we can test a number. Suppose n = 111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111. Noticing that 111/3 = 37, we can divide n by 3 and obtain n/3 = 37,037,037,037,037,037,037,037,037. The sum of the digits of this number is 90, so n/3 divides by 9. (n/3)/9 = n/27, so n divides by 27. Since any 27-digit number with one repeating digit is just a multiple of 111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111 -- i.e., a multiple of a multiple of 27 -- we conclude that n is divisible by 27.

CONFUSION :
[Reveal] Spoiler:
DO WE HAVE TO WRITE OUT THE WHOLE NUMBER? IS THERE ANOTHER WAY TO SOLVE? ALSO WHY DO WE DIVIDE 111 by 3? AND THEN HOW DO WE GET TO n/3 = 37,037,037,037,037,037,037,037,037?

Rule for divisibility by 3: The sum of the digits of the number should be multiple of 3

Rule for divisibility by 9: The sum of the nos digits of the number should be divisible by 9 or the number should be divisible by 3 two times.

Rules for divisibility by 27: The sum of the digits should a multiple of 27

Consider no 11111111...27 times = The sum 27*1=27----> divisbible by 3,9 and 27

consider number to be 222....27 times, then sum of the no. 27*2=54 divisibly by 3,9 and 27

So why so because when you sum the numbers either you can add the digits 27 times or multiply the digit *27..

Note that since 27 is divisble by 27,9 and 3 and thus the sum of the nos will be divisible by all the nos.

Ans is E

More on this: Refer to Number properties of GMAT CLUB Math Book
math-number-theory-88376.html
_________________

“If you can't fly then run, if you can't run then walk, if you can't walk then crawl, but whatever you do you have to keep moving forward.”

Manager
Joined: 28 May 2014
Posts: 64
Schools: NTU '16
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V27
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 31

Re: If n is a 27-digit positive integer, all of whose digits are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2014, 08:36
Wounded Tiger,

Do we have divisibility rule for 27 as "The sum of the digits should a multiple of 27"? Say we have 54 whose sum of digits is 9. Is 9 divisible by 27? Can you explain in detail? Thanks
Tutor
Joined: 20 Apr 2012
Posts: 101
Location: Ukraine
GMAT 1: 690 Q51 V31
GMAT 2: 730 Q51 V38
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 274 [1] , given: 36

Re: If n is a 27-digit positive integer, all of whose digits are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2014, 09:31
1
KUDOS
WoundedTiger wrote:
sagnik2422 wrote:
If n is a 27-digit positive integer, all of whose digits are the same, which of the following must be true?

I. n is divisible by 3
II. n is divisible by 9
III. n is divisible by 27

A. I only
B. I and II only
C. I and III only
D. II and III only
E. I, II and III

Explanation given:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
Suppose n = 111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111. Then the digits of n sum up to 27 * 1, which is divisible by 9, so n is divisible by both 3 and 9 by the basic divisibility rules given in our Arithmetic book. (Any other 27-digit integer with all identical digits is just a multiple of this first one, so we know that all the other values of n will divide by 3 and 9.) We might conclude that the divisibility rule "generalizes", and that any number whose digits sum to a multiple of 27 divides by 27. Be careful, though! This is exact the sort of natural, intuitive thinking that the testwriters like to exploit, so let's see if we can test a number. Suppose n = 111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111. Noticing that 111/3 = 37, we can divide n by 3 and obtain n/3 = 37,037,037,037,037,037,037,037,037. The sum of the digits of this number is 90, so n/3 divides by 9. (n/3)/9 = n/27, so n divides by 27. Since any 27-digit number with one repeating digit is just a multiple of 111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111 -- i.e., a multiple of a multiple of 27 -- we conclude that n is divisible by 27.

CONFUSION :
[Reveal] Spoiler:
DO WE HAVE TO WRITE OUT THE WHOLE NUMBER? IS THERE ANOTHER WAY TO SOLVE? ALSO WHY DO WE DIVIDE 111 by 3? AND THEN HOW DO WE GET TO n/3 = 37,037,037,037,037,037,037,037,037?

Rule for divisibility by 3: The sum of the digits of the number should be multiple of 3

Rule for divisibility by 9: The sum of the nos digits of the number should be divisible by 9 or the number should be divisible by 3 two times.

Rules for divisibility by 27: The sum of the digits should a multiple of 27

Consider no 11111111...27 times = The sum 27*1=27----> divisbible by 3,9 and 27

consider number to be 222....27 times, then sum of the no. 27*2=54 divisibly by 3,9 and 27

So why so because when you sum the numbers either you can add the digits 27 times or multiply the digit *27..

Note that since 27 is divisble by 27,9 and 3 and thus the sum of the nos will be divisible by all the nos.

Ans is E

More on this: Refer to Number properties of GMAT CLUB Math Book
math-number-theory-88376.html

Definitely not right criteria for divisibility by 27.
_________________

I'm happy, if I make math for you slightly clearer
And yes, I like kudos:)

Tutor
Joined: 20 Apr 2012
Posts: 101
Location: Ukraine
GMAT 1: 690 Q51 V31
GMAT 2: 730 Q51 V38
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 274 [0], given: 36

Re: If n is a 27-digit positive integer, all of whose digits are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2014, 09:34
sagnik2422 wrote:
If n is a 27-digit positive integer, all of whose digits are the same, which of the following must be true?

I. n is divisible by 3
II. n is divisible by 9
III. n is divisible by 27

A. I only
B. I and II only
C. I and III only
D. II and III only
E. I, II and III

Explanation given:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
Suppose n = 111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111. Then the digits of n sum up to 27 * 1, which is divisible by 9, so n is divisible by both 3 and 9 by the basic divisibility rules given in our Arithmetic book. (Any other 27-digit integer with all identical digits is just a multiple of this first one, so we know that all the other values of n will divide by 3 and 9.) We might conclude that the divisibility rule "generalizes", and that any number whose digits sum to a multiple of 27 divides by 27. Be careful, though! This is exact the sort of natural, intuitive thinking that the testwriters like to exploit, so let's see if we can test a number. Suppose n = 111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111. Noticing that 111/3 = 37, we can divide n by 3 and obtain n/3 = 37,037,037,037,037,037,037,037,037. The sum of the digits of this number is 90, so n/3 divides by 9. (n/3)/9 = n/27, so n divides by 27. Since any 27-digit number with one repeating digit is just a multiple of 111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111 -- i.e., a multiple of a multiple of 27 -- we conclude that n is divisible by 27.

CONFUSION :
[Reveal] Spoiler:
DO WE HAVE TO WRITE OUT THE WHOLE NUMBER? IS THERE ANOTHER WAY TO SOLVE? ALSO WHY DO WE DIVIDE 111 by 3? AND THEN HOW DO WE GET TO n/3 = 37,037,037,037,037,037,037,037,037?

I think the best solution is provided in spoiler.
_________________

I'm happy, if I make math for you slightly clearer
And yes, I like kudos:)

Director
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Posts: 728
Location: India
GPA: 3.21
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 695 [0], given: 723

Re: If n is a 27-digit positive integer, all of whose digits are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2014, 20:19
sri30kanth wrote:
Wounded Tiger,

Do we have divisibility rule for 27 as "The sum of the digits should a multiple of 27"? Say we have 54 whose sum of digits is 9. Is 9 divisible by 27? Can you explain in detail? Thanks

Hmmm....I agree with smyarga...

Look in general, we know a number is divisible by 3 if the sum of the digits of the nos is divisble by 3

For a number to divisible by 9, either the sum of the nos should be divisble by 9 or the number should be divisble by 3 two times

Similarly, for a no to be divisible by 27, it should be divisble by 3 three times...

There is no other method...

In my approach initially, I just extended the rule for 3 and 9 to 27 and as it can be seen it does not work out...Just went with flow I guess...

Like smyarga said, Best approach is the one given in the spoiler...
_________________

“If you can't fly then run, if you can't run then walk, if you can't walk then crawl, but whatever you do you have to keep moving forward.”

SVP
Status: The Best Or Nothing
Joined: 27 Dec 2012
Posts: 1858
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 47

Kudos [?]: 1930 [0], given: 193

Re: If n is a 27-digit positive integer, all of whose digits are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2014, 00:42
3 & 9 are multiples of 27; so divisibility applicable for 27, 3 & 9 would inherit from it

Lets take n = 2 (Neither divisible by 3, nor 6 nor 27)

Addition = 2*27 = 54 which is divisible by both 3,9 & 27

_________________

Kindly press "+1 Kudos" to appreciate

SVP
Status: The Best Or Nothing
Joined: 27 Dec 2012
Posts: 1858
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 47

Kudos [?]: 1930 [1] , given: 193

Re: If n is a 27-digit positive integer, all of whose digits are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2014, 00:46
1
KUDOS
sagnik2422 wrote:
If n is a 27-digit positive integer, all of whose digits are the same, which of the following must be true?

I. n is divisible by 3
II. n is divisible by 9
III. n is divisible by 27

A. I only
B. I and II only
C. I and III only
D. II and III only
E. I, II and III

Explanation given:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
Suppose n = 111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111. Then the digits of n sum up to 27 * 1, which is divisible by 9, so n is divisible by both 3 and 9 by the basic divisibility rules given in our Arithmetic book. (Any other 27-digit integer with all identical digits is just a multiple of this first one, so we know that all the other values of n will divide by 3 and 9.) We might conclude that the divisibility rule "generalizes", and that any number whose digits sum to a multiple of 27 divides by 27. Be careful, though! This is exact the sort of natural, intuitive thinking that the testwriters like to exploit, so let's see if we can test a number. Suppose n = 111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111. Noticing that 111/3 = 37, we can divide n by 3 and obtain n/3 = 37,037,037,037,037,037,037,037,037. The sum of the digits of this number is 90, so n/3 divides by 9. (n/3)/9 = n/27, so n divides by 27. Since any 27-digit number with one repeating digit is just a multiple of 111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111 -- i.e., a multiple of a multiple of 27 -- we conclude that n is divisible by 27.

CONFUSION :
[Reveal] Spoiler:
DO WE HAVE TO WRITE OUT THE WHOLE NUMBER? IS THERE ANOTHER WAY TO SOLVE? ALSO WHY DO WE DIVIDE 111 by 3? AND THEN HOW DO WE GET TO n/3 = 37,037,037,037,037,037,037,037,037?

Its not necessary to write the whole number. Though I have taken n=2 in my earlier post, its not necessary as well. We can also solve it by variable

nnn...........n ......... 27 times

Addition of digits = n+n+n+ ........... 27 times = 27n

27n is divisible by 27; so obviously by 3 & 9

_________________

Kindly press "+1 Kudos" to appreciate

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 13441
Followers: 575

Kudos [?]: 163 [0], given: 0

Re: If n is a 27-digit positive integer, all of whose digits are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2016, 19:59
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Oct 2016
Posts: 285
GPA: 3.98
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 26

If n is a 27-digit positive integer, all of whose digits are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2016, 03:16
sagnik2422 wrote:
If n is a 27-digit positive integer, all of whose digits are the same, which of the following must be true?

I. n is divisible by 3
II. n is divisible by 9
III. n is divisible by 27

A. I only
B. I and II only
C. I and III only
D. II and III only
E. I, II and III

Explanation given:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
Suppose n = 111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111. Then the digits of n sum up to 27 * 1, which is divisible by 9, so n is divisible by both 3 and 9 by the basic divisibility rules given in our Arithmetic book. (Any other 27-digit integer with all identical digits is just a multiple of this first one, so we know that all the other values of n will divide by 3 and 9.) We might conclude that the divisibility rule "generalizes", and that any number whose digits sum to a multiple of 27 divides by 27. Be careful, though! This is exact the sort of natural, intuitive thinking that the testwriters like to exploit, so let's see if we can test a number. Suppose n = 111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111. Noticing that 111/3 = 37, we can divide n by 3 and obtain n/3 = 37,037,037,037,037,037,037,037,037. The sum of the digits of this number is 90, so n/3 divides by 9. (n/3)/9 = n/27, so n divides by 27. Since any 27-digit number with one repeating digit is just a multiple of 111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111,111 -- i.e., a multiple of a multiple of 27 -- we conclude that n is divisible by 27.

CONFUSION :
[Reveal] Spoiler:
DO WE HAVE TO WRITE OUT THE WHOLE NUMBER? IS THERE ANOTHER WAY TO SOLVE? ALSO WHY DO WE DIVIDE 111 by 3? AND THEN HOW DO WE GET TO n/3 = 37,037,037,037,037,037,037,037,037?

$$N=aaaaaaaaaaaaa…$$. (27 times)

$$a+a+a+a+a+ … (27 times) = 27*a$$

Number is definitely divisible by 3 and 9. I and II are correct.

With 27 things are a bit trickier.

$$27*37=999$$ which is $$10^3 – 1$$

When we need to find remainder of a number in a form $$10^x – 1$$ we need to take clusters of digits taken by $$x$$ starting from the right and sum them up.

In our case $$aaaaaa… 27$$ times we split the number into the groups of $$aaa$$ starting from the right. We’ll get:

$$\frac{27}{3} *(aaa) = 9*aaa$$

Because we have particular case where all digits are the same, our group of aaa is divisible by 3. We can put

$$9*3x = 27x$$ and our number is divisible by 27. Option III is also correct.

In GENERAL divisibility by 3 and 9 does not automatically mean that number is divisible by 27. As example: 13779 (is divisible by 9 but not by 27). And we can't apply divisibility by 9 rule here. Although the sum of the diggits is 27 the number is not divisible by 27!
If n is a 27-digit positive integer, all of whose digits are   [#permalink] 12 Dec 2016, 03:16
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
54 Of the three-digit positive integers whose three digits are all differ 16 25 Apr 2016, 10:28
12 For all n such that n is a positive integer, the terms of a certain 7 08 Jun 2015, 08:08
7 Suppose x is a positive even number, all of whose digits are either 3 11 30 Jan 2015, 06:21
84 The sum of all the digits of the positive integer q is equal 23 21 Jan 2012, 15:02
17 If the two-digit integers M and N are positive and have the 7 12 Dec 2009, 08:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by