Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

statement (1) says 2 is not a factor of n. let n = 3, (n-1)(n+1) = 2*4/24 = 8/24 (remainder 8). let n be 5. then (n-1)n+1)/24 = 4* 6/24 (remainder zero). different remainders, insuffiecient.

statement 2 also insuffiecient, plug in value of n as 2 and 5 and we get different remainders.

combining both statements we have to take n as integer which is not a factor of 2 and 3. let us take n= 5. then (5-1)(5 +1)/24 remainder zero. again take n 7, then (7-1)(7+1)/24 = 8*6/24. remainder zero. so combining statement1 and 2 is sufficient to let us know that remainder of (n-1)(n+1)/24 is always going to be zero when n is not a factor of 2 or 3.

If n is a positive integer and r is the remainder when (n-1)(n+1) is divided by 24, what is the value of r?

(1) 2 is not a factor of n (2) 3 is not a factor of n

Another approach:

(n-1), n and (n+1) are consecutiveintegers.

If 2 is not a factor of n (i.e. n is odd), it must be a factor of (n-1) and (n+1) (the numbers around n must be even). Also, out of any two consecutive even numbers, one has to be divisible by 4 because every alternate multiple of 2 is divisible by 4. Hence, (n-1)*(n+1) must be divisible by 8.

Out of any 3 consecutiveintegers, one has to be divisible by 3 because every third integer is a multiple of 3. Out of (n-1), n and (n+1), one has to be divisible by 3. If n is not divisible by 3, one of (n-1) and (n+1) must be divisible by 3. Hence, (n-1)*(n+1) must be divisible by 3.

Using both statements, (n-1)*(n+1) must be divisible by 8*3 = 24. Remainder must be 0.

Re: If n is a positive integer and r is the remainder when [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Sep 2013, 23:15

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

If n is a positive integer and r is the remainder when (n-1)(n+1) is divided by 24, what is the value of r?

Number plugging method:

\((n-1)(n+1)=n^2-1\)

(1) n is not divisible by 2 --> pick two odd numbers: let's say 1 and 3 --> if \(n=1\), then \(n^2-1=0\) and as zero is divisible by 24 (zero is divisible by any integer except zero itself) so remainder is 0 but if \(n=3\), then \(n^2-1=8\) and 8 divided by 24 yields remainder of 8. Two different answers, hence not sufficient.

(2) n is not divisible by 3 --> pick two numbers which are not divisible by 3: let's say 1 and 2 --> if \(n=1\), then \(n^2-1=0\), so remainder is 0 but if \(n=2\), then \(n^2-1=3\) and 3 divided by 24 yields remainder of 3. Two different answers, hence not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Let's check for several numbers which are not divisible by 2 or 3: \(n=1\) --> \(n^2-1=0\) --> remainder 0; \(n=5\) --> \(n^2-1=24\) --> remainder 0; \(n=7\) --> \(n^2-1=48\) --> remainder 0; \(n=11\) --> \(n^2-1=120\) --> remainder 0. Well it seems that all appropriate numbers will give remainder of 0. Sufficient.

Algebraic approach:

(1) n is not divisible by 2. Insufficient on its own, but this statement says that \(n=odd\) --> \(n-1\) and \(n+1\) are consecutive even integers --> \((n-1)(n+1)\) must be divisible by 8 (as both multiples are even and one of them will be divisible by 4. From consecutive even integers one is divisible by 4: (2, 4); (4, 6); (6, 8); (8, 10); (10, 12), ...).

(2) n is not divisible by 3. Insufficient on its own, but form this statement either \(n-1\) or \(n+1\) must be divisible by 3 (as \(n-1\), \(n\), and \(n+1\) are consecutiveintegers, so one of them must be divisible by 3, we are told that it's not \(n\), hence either \(n-1\) or \(n+1\)).

(1)+(2) From (1) \((n-1)(n+1)\) is divisible by 8, from (2) it's also divisible by 3, therefore it must be divisible by \(8*3=24\), which means that remainder upon division \((n-1)(n+1)\) by 24 will be 0. Sufficient.

Check out this awesome article about Anderson on Poets Quants, http://poetsandquants.com/2015/01/02/uclas-anderson-school-morphs-into-a-friendly-tech-hub/ . Anderson is a great place! Sorry for the lack of updates recently. I...

As you leave central, bustling Tokyo and head Southwest the scenery gradually changes from urban to farmland. You go through a tunnel and on the other side all semblance...

Ghibli studio’s Princess Mononoke was my first exposure to Japan. I saw it at a sleepover with a neighborhood friend after playing some video games and I was...