Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 04 Jul 2015, 20:56

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If n is a positive integer, is (n+1)! - (n-1)! greater than

Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Joined: 18 Apr 2005
Posts: 548
Location: Canuckland
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

If n is a positive integer, is (n+1)! - (n-1)! greater than [#permalink]  12 Jun 2005, 17:21
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
If n is a positive integer, is (n+1)! - (n-1)! greater than (n+1)!/(n-1)! ?
1) Square root of n is a positive integer
2) n is divisible by 2
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 May 2005
Posts: 272
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Statement (1) does not give any useful information that i can see

(n+1)!-(n-1)! is greater than (n+1)!/(n-1)! for any positive number except 1 (as (n-1)! would be 0...i think!...thus making (n+1)!/(n-1)! undefined).
If n is divisible by 2...the lowest possible value of n is two...
this is sufficient to say (n+1)!-(n-1)! > (n+1)!/(n-1)!

Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 853
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

cloudz9 wrote:
Statement (1) does not give any useful information that i can see

(n+1)!-(n-1)! is greater than (n+1)!/(n-1)! for any positive number except 1 (as (n-1)! would be 0...i think!...thus making (n+1)!/(n-1)! undefined).
If n is divisible by 2...the lowest possible value of n is two...
this is sufficient to say (n+1)!-(n-1)! > (n+1)!/(n-1)!

the whole equation reduces to (n-1)! * (n(n+1) -1) ... this needs to be compared with (n+1)!/(n-1)! = n(n+1)

I) Square root of n is a positive integer
n can be 1 or 2 or any number greater than 2

for n =1 0! =1 (not zero) - LHS will be less than RHS
for n = 2, LHS < RHS
for n - 3, LHS = 2*11 ; RHS = 12 => LHS > RHS
and for any number greater than 2, LHS > RHS

We need (2) to determine that n is greater than 2

(2) only this is not sufficient either as n can be equal to 2

and hence C
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 May 2005
Posts: 272
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

yeah true sorry

agree with C then
SVP
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1731
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

yah, agree with C. if n <3, second term is larger. if n>2, the first term is larger.

togather, n >2. so it is sufficient.

sparky nice problem..............
Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3387
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 2

How is it C! I am coming up with E

we need to know that if N is positive, greater than 2.....

I know it is positive from both statements, but dont know if it is greater than 2?
Director
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 868
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

I will go with C too
The equation reduces to (n-1)![n(n+1) -1] > n(n+1)
From statement 1: n can be 1, 4, 9,...
when n is 1: (n-1)![n(n+1) -1] is not > than n(n+1)
when n is 4: (n-1)![n(n+1) -1] is > than n(n+1)
when n is 9: (n-1)![n(n+1) -1] is > than n(n+1)
so statement 1 is not sufficient

From statement 2: n can be any even number such as 2, 4, 6, 8....
when n is 2: (n-1)![n(n+1) -1] is not > than n(n+1)
when n is 4: (n-1)![n(n+1) -1] is > than n(n+1)
so statement 2 is not sufficient

But both put together: n can be 4, 16, .....
As shown above the condition is satisfied for any number greater than 2
Hence C
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 374
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

The two values can be equal, or one can be greater than the other.

For n=1, the values are equal

For n=2, LHS < RHS

For n > 2 LHS < RHS

So we need to find if n=1 or n=2 or n > 2

I alone gives us not enough information. n could be 1,4,9 etc.

II alone gives us not enough information n could be 2,4,6 etc.

I&II together say that n could be 4,16,36 etc. which is sufficient to determine that LHS < RHS

So I'll go for C
Intern
Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

I will pick B.

Statement 1, it repets nothing but the original condition that n is a positive integer. It behaves differently for 1 and any higher positive integer. Hence Insufficient. Hence rule out option D as well.

Statement 2, says n is even. substraction operation on two positive integer ( Large positive integer- small positive integer) is always greater than division operation on of the same two numbers ( large positive number/small positive number). Hence B is sufficient.

So answer is B. No need to look at C and E.
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 375
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Re: DS X [#permalink]  14 Jun 2005, 10:52
sparky wrote:
If n is a positive integer, is (n+1)! - (n-1)! greater than (n+1)!/(n-1)! ?
1) Square root of n is a positive integer
2) n is divisible by 2

I think it is C.

The stem reduces to (n-1)! [ n^2 + n - 1 ] > [ n^2 + n ] ?

We need to know that if (n-1)! = 1 then it is NO , but if (n-1) ! > 1 then YES.

Since the least n which is a sqaure of a number and a multiple of 2 is 4. (n-1)! > 1 ,hece the aswer is YES always.

HMTG.
Intern
Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Quote:
tarungmat wrote:

substraction operation on two positive integer ( Large positive integer- small positive integer) is always greater than division operation on of the same two numbers ( large positive number/small positive number).

3 - 2 is not greater than 3 /2

Clarification: I meant in question's context (with factorial ). we will never have a situation 3-2 and 3/2 according to statement 2.
Please let me know why not B is correct as per my logic.
SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2246
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 0

Re: DS X [#permalink]  15 Jun 2005, 20:51
sparky wrote:
If n is a positive integer, is (n+1)! - (n-1)! greater than (n+1)!/(n-1)! ?
1) Square root of n is a positive integer
2) n is divisible by 2

(n+1)! - (n-1)!=(n-1)!*n*(n+1)-(n-1)!
(n+1)!/(n-1)! =n*(n+1)
(n+1)! - (n-1)! - (n+1)!/(n-1)! = (n-1)!*[n(n+1)-1]-n(n+1)

When n<=2, (n-1)!<=1
(n-1)!*[n(n+1)-1]-n(n+1)<=n(n+1)-1-n(n+1)=-1<0

When n>=3, (n-1)!>=2
(n-1)!*[n(n+1)-1]-n(n+1)>=2n(n+1)-1-n(n+1)=n(n+1)-1>0

(1) n is square of an integer, n could be 1 or 4 or greater, insufficient
(2) n is even, n could be 2 or 4 or greater, insufficient
Combined, n could only be 4 or greater, sufficient. (It's always >0 when n>=3)

(C)
_________________

Keep on asking, and it will be given you;
keep on seeking, and you will find;
keep on knocking, and it will be opened to you.

VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2005
Posts: 1001
Location: New York
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Quote:
Square root of n is a positive integer
n can be 1 or 2 or any number greater than 2

How can N be 2..N can be 1or 4 or 9
Sq root of 2 is 1.41414 some thing which is not a positive integer

correct me if i am wrong...

Cheers
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Are positive integers p and q both greater than n? 1) p-q is 1 01 Sep 2008, 03:52
2 Are positive integers p and q both greater than n? 1. p-q is 5 17 Jun 2008, 16:49
are positive integers p and q both greater than n? 1. 1 05 Feb 2008, 21:24
Are positive integers p and q both greater than n? 1) p-q is 4 30 Jan 2008, 11:54
Are positive integers P and Q both greater than n? 1.P-Q is 4 08 Jul 2007, 13:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by