Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 29 Aug 2014, 02:10

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

If n is a positive integer, is (n+1)! - (n-1)! greater than

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 18 Apr 2005
Posts: 551
Location: Canuckland
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
If n is a positive integer, is (n+1)! - (n-1)! greater than [#permalink] New post 12 Jun 2005, 17:21
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
If n is a positive integer, is (n+1)! - (n-1)! greater than (n+1)!/(n-1)! ?
1) Square root of n is a positive integer
2) n is divisible by 2
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2005
Posts: 273
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 12 Jun 2005, 18:32
Statement (1) does not give any useful information that i can see

(n+1)!-(n-1)! is greater than (n+1)!/(n-1)! for any positive number except 1 (as (n-1)! would be 0...i think!...thus making (n+1)!/(n-1)! undefined).
If n is divisible by 2...the lowest possible value of n is two...
this is sufficient to say (n+1)!-(n-1)! > (n+1)!/(n-1)!

thus, my answer is B
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 854
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 12 Jun 2005, 18:39
cloudz9 wrote:
Statement (1) does not give any useful information that i can see

(n+1)!-(n-1)! is greater than (n+1)!/(n-1)! for any positive number except 1 (as (n-1)! would be 0...i think!...thus making (n+1)!/(n-1)! undefined).
If n is divisible by 2...the lowest possible value of n is two...
this is sufficient to say (n+1)!-(n-1)! > (n+1)!/(n-1)!

thus, my answer is B


the whole equation reduces to (n-1)! * (n(n+1) -1) ... this needs to be compared with (n+1)!/(n-1)! = n(n+1)

I) Square root of n is a positive integer
n can be 1 or 2 or any number greater than 2

for n =1 0! =1 (not zero) - LHS will be less than RHS
for n = 2, LHS < RHS
for n - 3, LHS = 2*11 ; RHS = 12 => LHS > RHS
and for any number greater than 2, LHS > RHS

We need (2) to determine that n is greater than 2

(2) only this is not sufficient either as n can be equal to 2

and hence C
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2005
Posts: 273
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 12 Jun 2005, 18:50
yeah true sorry
made a stupid mistake

agree with C then
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1736
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 12 Jun 2005, 21:45
yah, agree with C. if n <3, second term is larger. if n>2, the first term is larger.

togather, n >2. so it is sufficient.

sparky nice problem..............
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3405
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 13 Jun 2005, 07:12
How is it C! I am coming up with E

we need to know that if N is positive, greater than 2.....

I know it is positive from both statements, but dont know if it is greater than 2?
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 870
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 13 Jun 2005, 09:53
I will go with C too
The equation reduces to (n-1)![n(n+1) -1] > n(n+1)
From statement 1: n can be 1, 4, 9,...
when n is 1: (n-1)![n(n+1) -1] is not > than n(n+1)
when n is 4: (n-1)![n(n+1) -1] is > than n(n+1)
when n is 9: (n-1)![n(n+1) -1] is > than n(n+1)
so statement 1 is not sufficient

From statement 2: n can be any even number such as 2, 4, 6, 8....
when n is 2: (n-1)![n(n+1) -1] is not > than n(n+1)
when n is 4: (n-1)![n(n+1) -1] is > than n(n+1)
so statement 2 is not sufficient

But both put together: n can be 4, 16, .....
As shown above the condition is satisfied for any number greater than 2
Hence C
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 374
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 13 Jun 2005, 13:29
The two values can be equal, or one can be greater than the other.

For n=1, the values are equal

For n=2, LHS < RHS

For n > 2 LHS < RHS

So we need to find if n=1 or n=2 or n > 2

I alone gives us not enough information. n could be 1,4,9 etc.

II alone gives us not enough information n could be 2,4,6 etc.

I&II together say that n could be 4,16,36 etc. which is sufficient to determine that LHS < RHS

So I'll go for C
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 Jun 2005, 04:12
I will pick B.

Statement 1, it repets nothing but the original condition that n is a positive integer. It behaves differently for 1 and any higher positive integer. Hence Insufficient. Hence rule out option D as well.

Statement 2, says n is even. substraction operation on two positive integer ( Large positive integer- small positive integer) is always greater than division operation on of the same two numbers ( large positive number/small positive number). Hence B is sufficient.

So answer is B. No need to look at C and E.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 377
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: DS X [#permalink] New post 14 Jun 2005, 10:52
sparky wrote:
If n is a positive integer, is (n+1)! - (n-1)! greater than (n+1)!/(n-1)! ?
1) Square root of n is a positive integer
2) n is divisible by 2


I think it is C.

The stem reduces to (n-1)! [ n^2 + n - 1 ] > [ n^2 + n ] ?

We need to know that if (n-1)! = 1 then it is NO , but if (n-1) ! > 1 then YES.

Since the least n which is a sqaure of a number and a multiple of 2 is 4. (n-1)! > 1 ,hece the aswer is YES always.

HMTG.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 Jun 2005, 23:50
Quote:
tarungmat wrote:

substraction operation on two positive integer ( Large positive integer- small positive integer) is always greater than division operation on of the same two numbers ( large positive number/small positive number).


3 - 2 is not greater than 3 /2



Clarification: I meant in question's context (with factorial ). we will never have a situation 3-2 and 3/2 according to statement 2.
Please let me know why not B is correct as per my logic.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2255
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: DS X [#permalink] New post 15 Jun 2005, 20:51
sparky wrote:
If n is a positive integer, is (n+1)! - (n-1)! greater than (n+1)!/(n-1)! ?
1) Square root of n is a positive integer
2) n is divisible by 2


(n+1)! - (n-1)!=(n-1)!*n*(n+1)-(n-1)!
(n+1)!/(n-1)! =n*(n+1)
(n+1)! - (n-1)! - (n+1)!/(n-1)! = (n-1)!*[n(n+1)-1]-n(n+1)

When n<=2, (n-1)!<=1
(n-1)!*[n(n+1)-1]-n(n+1)<=n(n+1)-1-n(n+1)=-1<0

When n>=3, (n-1)!>=2
(n-1)!*[n(n+1)-1]-n(n+1)>=2n(n+1)-1-n(n+1)=n(n+1)-1>0

(1) n is square of an integer, n could be 1 or 4 or greater, insufficient
(2) n is even, n could be 2 or 4 or greater, insufficient
Combined, n could only be 4 or greater, sufficient. (It's always >0 when n>=3)

(C)
_________________

Keep on asking, and it will be given you;
keep on seeking, and you will find;
keep on knocking, and it will be opened to you.

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 14 Feb 2005
Posts: 1001
Location: New York
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 15 Jun 2005, 21:00
Quote:
Square root of n is a positive integer
n can be 1 or 2 or any number greater than 2


How can N be 2..N can be 1or 4 or 9
Sq root of 2 is 1.41414 some thing which is not a positive integer

correct me if i am wrong...

Cheers
  [#permalink] 15 Jun 2005, 21:00
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic If n is a positive integer greater than 1, then 2^{n-1} + 2^ fozzzy 4 06 Sep 2013, 23:46
Are positive integers p and q both greater than n? 1) p-q is rnemani 1 01 Sep 2008, 03:52
2 Are positive integers p and q both greater than n? 1. p-q is vksunder 5 17 Jun 2008, 16:49
Are positive integers p and q both greater than n? 1) p - q sondenso 4 19 Feb 2008, 18:56
are positive integers p and q both greater than n? 1. el1981 1 05 Feb 2008, 21:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

If n is a positive integer, is (n+1)! - (n-1)! greater than

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.