Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

If n is an integer and n^3 is between 1 and 100 inclusive, [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Aug 2011, 12:56

If n is an integer and n^3 is between 1 and 100 inclusive, what is the value of n? (1) n= 2k +1, where k is an integer (2) n is a prime number.

This is an example question from Manhattan Gmat Numbers Properties guide 1. When I initially did the question, I chose statement 1. as sufficient on its own.

Firstly, in the question stem you can narrow down the choices for n as being between 1 and 4. I then tested numbers in the equation in statement 1 and felt able to conclude that n was 3, as plugging any other integers higher than 1 for k made n>4. Statement 2 only allows me to narrow the choice down to 2 or 3 so its insufficient. BUT when i read through the answer explanation, they dismiss statement 1 as only telling us that n is odd, meaning it leaves us with a choice of 1 or 3, therefore, you'd need both statements to be able to conclude that n was 3.

K can be zero and zero is an integer. Thus, I don't think statement 1 alone is sufficient.

yes, it can be zero! that'll give me 1 as the answer. I guess I'm not out of the habit of think of integers as 1 and beyond. i don't think i'll forget the importance of the almighty zero from now on! thanks for the quick response.

If n is an integer and n^3 is between 1 and 100 inclusive, what is the value of n?

(1) n= 2k +1, where k is an integer (2) n is a prime number.

This is an example question from Manhattan Gmat Numbers Properties guide 1. When I initially did the question, I chose statement 1. as sufficient on its own.

Firstly, in the question stem you can narrow down the choices for n as being between 1 and 4. I then tested numbers in the equation in statement 1 and felt able to conclude that n was 3, as plugging any other integers higher than 1 for k made n>4. Statement 2 only allows me to narrow the choice down to 2 or 3 so its insufficient.

BUT when i read through the answer explanation, they dismiss statement 1 as only telling us that n is odd, meaning it leaves us with a choice of 1 or 3, therefore, you'd need both statements to be able to conclude that n was 3.

Could someone tell me where I went wrong?

If n is an integer and n^3 is between 1 and 100 inclusive, what is the value of n

From the question n can be only be positive integers: either 1 or 2 or 3 or 4.

(1) If n = 2k +1, where k is an integer: Here, k can only be 0 and 1 and n could be 1 or 3. not sufficient.

If n is an integer and n^3 is between 1 and 100 inclusive, what is the value of n?

(1) n= 2k +1, where k is an integer (2) n is a prime number.

This is an example question from Manhattan Gmat Numbers Properties guide 1. When I initially did the question, I chose statement 1. as sufficient on its own.

Firstly, in the question stem you can narrow down the choices for n as being between 1 and 4. I then tested numbers in the equation in statement 1 and felt able to conclude that n was 3, as plugging any other integers higher than 1 for k made n>4. Statement 2 only allows me to narrow the choice down to 2 or 3 so its insufficient.

BUT when i read through the answer explanation, they dismiss statement 1 as only telling us that n is odd, meaning it leaves us with a choice of 1 or 3, therefore, you'd need both statements to be able to conclude that n was 3.

Could someone tell me where I went wrong?

If n is an integer and n^3 is between 1 and 100 inclusive, what is the value of n

From the question n can be only be positive integers: either 1 or 2 or 3 or 4.

(1) If n = 2k +1, where k is an integer: Here, k can only be 0 and 1 and n could be 1 or 3. not sufficient.

(2) If n is a prime number, n could be 2 or 3.

from 1 and 2, n is 3. So that's C.

Can you pls help me understand why K will ONLY b "0" or "1"??

From Question n^3 is between 1 & 100 so n can not be negative now 1^3=1 2^3=8 3^3=27 4^=64 values greater than 4 ruled out 1. n = 2k+1, not sufficient to identify the answer 2. n= Prime number not sufficient to identify the answer

combining both k can be 0 or 1 as we are restricted to values of n=1, 2, 3 & 4 so 4 is also ruled out we are left with 1, 2 & 3 Now A natural number is called a prime number (or a prime) if it is bigger than one and has no divisors other than 1 and itself. So left with 2 & 3 now here k value becomes 1 so answer come to 3

So C is right Answer

Give Kudos if you understood it

gmatclubot

Re: Number properties question
[#permalink]
19 Aug 2011, 21:37

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...