Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Question: what is the remainder when n is divided by 7 ?
(1) if n+1 has a remainder of 0 when divided by 7, then, if positive, n has a remainder of six, but, if negative, it has a remainder of one. insufficient
(2) if n+8 has a remainder of 0 when divided by 7, the same discrepancy between negative and positive numbers occurs. insufficient.
(1+2) if n+8 and n+1 have remainders of 0, then if n is positive, n still has a remainder of six, and, negative, n still has a remainder of one. Either is possible. insufficient.
If n is an integer, what is the remainder when n is divided by 7?
1) n+1 is divisible by 7 2) n+8 is divisible by 7
D. Reminder(s) can never be negative but is(are) always: 0 <= r =< 7. Lets say n = ax + r, where a = 7, x is quotient, and r is reminder. Or, n = 7x + r Then in each case above, r = 6.
1) If n = 7x + r, n+1 = (7x+r) + 1. If so, r must be 6. Suff............
If "n= 7x + r" is -ve, x has to be -ve. Then n +1 = (7x + r) + 1 If suppose x = -1, n+1 = 7(-1) + r + 1 = -6+r. What has to be r to have (n+1) divisible by 7? r = +6. Somebody might say -1 but remember r can never be -ve. So what is the minimum r can be 6 because r must be >0 but smaller than 7.
2) If n = 7x + r, n+8 = (7x+r) + 8. Or, n+8 = 7(x+1) + r +1 Now the equation is similar to the eq. in 1. Therefore r = 6 again. Suff................
yes but even if the remainder is always positive, but either expression could make the remainder either 1 or 6. n is not necessarily always positive, and if n+1 is divisible by 7, n could easily be -50 or 48, giving you two different remainders, whether they are 1<= r <= 7 .
yes but even if the remainder is always positive, but either expression could make the remainder either 1 or 6. n is not necessarily always positive, and if n+1 is divisible by 7, n could easily be -50 or 48, giving you two different remainders, whether they are 1<= r <= 7 .
Still say E.
Still D even if n = -50 or 48 because r = 6 in either case.
n +1 = 7(-8) + (r + 1) where (r+1) = 7 or r = 6. n +1 = -56 + 7 n = -49-1 = -50
Simple logic, if n+1 is divided by 7 leaves reminder 0, then n/7 must have 6 reminder no matter n is +ve or -ve.. _________________
Although there is a better method, my Finding The Pattern method-- when in doubt, FTP!!!!!!!! Because there is always a pattern.
Question: (N/7 remainder?)
(1)N+1 is divisible by 7
N=6,13,20,27,34,... Question=6,6,6,6,6,......
Sufficient
(2)N+8 is divisible by 7
N=6,13,20,27,34,... Question=6,6,6,6,6...
Sufficient
General rule of thumb generate the possible values and check the remainder really fast... if it changes insufficient, otherwise sufficient. _________________
I obviously need to brush up on division skills I guess.
pls explain how -50/7 has a remainder 6.
wouldn't it be -7 Remainder 1, because it divides seven times and has a remainder of 1, or would it be -8 Remainder 6, since it divides 8 times (-56) and has a positive 6 remainder?
Generally a remainder has to be between 0 & what you're dividing by--it can be negative, but you can always convert it to a positive integer. So as a rule of thumb on the GMAT, work with positive remainders.
If you do get a negative remainder you can always convert it to a positive one.
For example, what's the remainder when -83 is divided by -3?
I obviously need to brush up on division skills I guess.
pls explain how -50/7 has a remainder 6.
wouldn't it be -7 Remainder 1, because it divides seven times and has a remainder of 1, or would it be -8 Remainder 6, since it divides 8 times (-56) and has a positive 6 remainder?
Generally a remainder has to be between 0 & what you're dividing by--it can be negative, but you can always convert it to a positive integer. So as a rule of thumb on the GMAT, work with positive remainders.
If you do get a negative remainder you can always convert it to a positive one.
For example, what's the remainder when -83 is divided by -3?
-83 = -3*(27) - 2
or
-83 = -3*(28) + 1
The remainder is -2 or 1.
Does the OG has this rule in it ?
I just checked, it doesn't look like it's in the Quant review. I've never seen a remainder question where you're given negative numbers... _________________
Wikipedia has an interesting article on remainder. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remainder It says Remainder can have negative values as well, unless specified by the condition x < r ≤ x+|d| (or x ≤ r < x+|d|), where x is a constant, d is the divisor, and r is the remainder.
I obviously need to brush up on division skills I guess.
pls explain how -50/7 has a remainder 6.
wouldn't it be -7 Remainder 1, because it divides seven times and has a remainder of 1, or would it be -8 Remainder 6, since it divides 8 times (-56) and has a positive 6 remainder?
But generally we want the remainder to be \(0<=R<7\), so we'd go with remainder of 6.
As you have just shown, -ve numbers can be written in two ways (actually you have shown more than two) Given that the Q does not tell whether n is positive or negative or whether the remainder is exclusively positive to eliminate some of the candidates. we have to consider both cases. All that we need with DS is one case to make it E. I believe that there exists such a case.
Re: Remainder of n [#permalink]
18 Jun 2009, 11:25
It's the same same remainder, whether it's -6 or +1 as I explained above, and to make it simpler the standard convention is to express it between 0 & the divisor.
If your logic were correct then every single remainder question would be E on the GMAT as there is a billion different ways of rewriting it. _________________
Re: Remainder of n [#permalink]
18 Jun 2009, 12:03
Hades wrote:
It's the same same remainder, whether it's -6 or +1 as I explained above, and to make it simpler the standard convention is to express it between 0 & the divisor.
If your logic were correct then every single remainder question would be E on the GMAT as there is a billion different ways of rewriting it.
K, I guess you got me wrong. When ever we divide a number with x the remainder is between 0 and x-1. This is the general rule of thumb, Which I am not debating.
How ever, the concepts get dicey if n is just an integer and not positive integer and happens to be a -ve integer as it is here.
To be clear, I don t consider all re writes of a -ve integer. I only consider two of them the one with -ve remainder and +ve remainder. With out much fuss, I will agree that we need to know what GMAT thinks if an integer is not explicitly stated as positive.
Wikipedia has an interesting article on remainder. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remainder It says Remainder can have negative values as well, unless specified by the condition x < r ≤ x+|d| (or x ≤ r < x+|d|), where x is a constant, d is the divisor, and r is the remainder.
Several points here:
-First, as that wikipedia article makes clear, mathematicians do not allow remainders to be negative (see where they say "as is usual for mathematicians", when giving the positive solution). ;
-So, when you divide an integer by 7, there are only seven possible remainders: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Remainders can't be negative, they can't be decimals, and they can't be greater than or equal to what you're dividing by;
-I have never seen a real GMAT question that asks about remainders when dividing by a negative number. Nor have I seen questions which ask for the remainder when dividing a negative by a positive number;
-Still, we can see how to find the remainder when dividing, say, -15 by 7. First, we find the remainder when dividing, for example, 20 by 7 as follows:
--we find the nearest multiple of 7 which is *smaller* than 20. That's 14; --we subtract: 20 - 14 = 6. That is, 20 is 6 larger than the nearest smaller multiple of 7, so the remainder is 6 when we divide 20 by 7;
-Doing the same for -15:
--the nearest multiple of 7 which is *smaller* than -15 is -21; --now, -15 - (-21) = 6. That is, -15 is 6 greater than the nearest multiple of 7 which is smaller than -15, and the remainder is 6 when -15 is divided by 7.
So, going back to the original question in this post, the remainder is the same regardless of whether n is positive or negative, and the answer is D. _________________
GMAT Tutor in Toronto
If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
As I’m halfway through my second year now, graduation is now rapidly approaching. I’ve neglected this blog in the last year, mainly because I felt I didn’...
Perhaps known best for its men’s basketball team – winners of five national championships, including last year’s – Duke University is also home to an elite full-time MBA...
Hilary Term has only started and we can feel the heat already. The two weeks have been packed with activities and submissions, giving a peek into what will follow...