Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

1) p-2 and q+2 are consecutive even integers 2) p is prime

(1) if p-2 and q+2 are consecutive also, then it MUST be the case that p>q. Suff.

(2) p is prime, then it´s =2. If p and q are consecutive even integers, then q = 0 or 4 (even integer can be +ve, -ve, or 0), then we cannot know for sure whether p<>q. Insuff.

1) P-2 and q+2 are consecutive even integers.
take the sample numbers where both numbers are positive and both are negative. you will see that p>q is always true for p-2 and q +2 to be consecutive even integers. you can also test this eith {-2, 0} and {0, 2}. - sufficient

2) p is prime. q could be 0 or 4. for 0 p >q holds up but not for 4. - not sufficient

Hey guys,
when i first looked at it, it also thought it was A, but if yo uthink about it's not enough to just say that p IS greater the q. In this case q is greater than p. (from the second option, where p is prime) The question asks if p>q, in this case you could you with certainty that it is not, therefore D, wither statement is suffiecient. One proves that p>q, and the other that P<q. Who cares if it is or not, point is that you could say it with certinty, and this is what GMAT wants.

For this DS question, I will examine each statement alone.

What's asked: is p>q ?
What's given: p and q are consecutive even integers

What do we know?
either p = q+2 or p = q-2

1) p-2 and q+2 are consecutive even integers
-------------------------------------------------------
if p = q-2, then p-2 = q-4 which can never be a consecutive even integer after or before q+2
Thus, p = q+2 and hence p>q

Statement 1 is sufficient

2) p is prime
----------------
We know that p is even, and the only even prime integer is 2. Since q and p are consecutive even integers, q can be either 0 or 4.