Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

If p and q are consecutive positive integers, is p a multiple of 3 ? [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Dec 2011, 08:51

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

46% (01:25) correct
54% (00:24) wrong based on 24 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

If p and q are consecutive positive integers, is p a multiple of 3 ?

(1) \(q\) is not a multiple of 3. (2) \(q - 1\) is not a multiple of 3.

The question is easy; however, I have a doubt in relation to the number 0. Should we consider 0 a multiple of 3? I think we should because a multiple of an integer is that integer multiplied by other integer. So , if 0 is that other integer, \(3 x 0 = 0\); thereofore, 0 is a multiple of 3. In other words, 0 would be a multiple of every number.

But I don't know whether it is the reasoning of the GMAT. Or, do they consider only positive multiples? In other words, they don't consider 0 "the other integer" to create a multiple. If they think in that way, how is the answer for this question affected? For example, in statement (2), could \(q\) be 1? In that sense, \(q-1\) would be 0, and if they only consider positive multiples, \(q-1\) would not be a multiple of 3. I know that the answer to my question is not necessary to solve this problem, but I prefer to solve that doubt for future problems.

Good question. 0 is a multiple of 3. Negative numbers can also be multiples of 3. The set of multiples of 3 is {...-9, -6, -3, 0, 3, 6, 9...}

Typically, questions on the GMAT specifically call out positive multiples. And by rule, questions that ask about Least Common Multiples (LCMs) refer to the least common positive multiples.

Re: If p and q are consecutive positive integers, is p a multiple of 3 ? [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Dec 2011, 09:19

bhavinp wrote:

Good question. 0 is a multiple of 3. Negative numbers can also be multiples of 3. The set of multiples of 3 is {...-9, -6, -3, 0, 3, 6, 9...}

Typically, questions on the GMAT specifically call out positive multiples. And by rule, questions that ask about Least Common Multiples (LCMs) refer to the least common positive multiples.

I hope that helps!

Thank you bhavnip!, kudos for you

So, if this question were in the real exam, I should think that 0 is a multiple of 3, right?
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

We know that p and q are consecutive positive integers. So p could be q+1 or it could be q-1

From statement 1 we know that q is not a multiple of 3. So we know that either q+1 or q-1 is a multiple of 3, since 1 of every 3 consecutive integers must be a multiple of 3. Statement 2 tells us that q-1 is not a multiple of 3, so combining this with Statement 1, we now know that q+1 is a multiple of 3. However, we still don't know if p=q+1 or if p=q-1.

So combining both statements is not sufficient.
_________________

Bhavin Parikh Magoosh Test Prep

gmatclubot

Re: If p and q are consecutive positive integers, is p a multiple of 3 ?
[#permalink]
14 Dec 2011, 10:38

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...