Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/Login.

_________________

Cheers! JT........... If u like my post..... payback in Kudos!!

|Do not post questions with OA|Please underline your SC questions while posting|Try posting the explanation along with your answer choice| |For CR refer Powerscore CR Bible|For SC refer Manhattan SC Guide|

~~Better Burn Out... Than Fade Away~~

Last edited by Bunuel on 15 Oct 2013, 08:04, edited 1 time in total.

Renamed the topic, edited the question and added the OA.

It is true that the two statements will never contradict each other. However in this case you must also consider that 'q' can have multiple ranges of values

i.e.: q>1 and q<-2. If q>1, then q=1.5, 2, 3, 4,5, etc., thus statement 1 is INSUFFICENT but when q<-2, you have a clear and decisive answer to this yes/no DS question.

Re: If p/q > 5, is q<2? 1. q>1 2. -2p>20 SOURCE - PR [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Oct 2013, 05:41

jeeteshsingh wrote:

If p/q > 5, is q<2?

1. q>1 2. -2p>20

SOURCE - PR 1021

Please explain!

Hi all, I'll give this one a shot. So here we go.

If p/q > 5, is q<2?

Statement 1- Clearly Insuff Statament 2 - Now couple of things on inequalities

First of all, p/q > 5, We can multiply both sides by 'q' only because we know that p/q is positive (since it is >5) so then p and q will both have the same sign. So we have that p>5q Second, we have -2p>20. Note that in this case since we are dividing both sides by -2, we MUST switch the inequality sign. So p<-10. Now we need to combine both statements

-10>p>5q So we have that -10>5q, Hence q<2. Answer is B

Happy to discuss this nice inequalities problem further Cheers J

Notice that from p/q > 5 it follows that p and q have the same sign

(1) q > 1. If q = 2 and p = 100, then the answer is NO but if q = 1.5 and p = 100, then the answer is YES. Not sufficient.

(2) -2p > 20. Reduce by -2 and flip the sign: p < -10. So, we have that p is negative, thus q is negative too --> q = negative < 2. Sufficient.

Technically answer should be B, as statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked.

But even though formal answer to the question is B, this is not a realistic GMAT question, as: on the GMAT, two data sufficiency statements always provide TRUE information and these statements never contradict each other. But the statements above contradict each other: From (1) we have that q is positive and from (2) we have that q is negative. The statements clearly contradict each other.

So, the question is flawed. You won't see such a question on the test.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...