Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: If r and s are positive integers, is r/s an integer? [#permalink]
23 Feb 2012, 07:26

3

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

If r and s are positive integers, is r/s an integer?

(1) Every factor of s is also a factor of r. If every factor of s is also factor of r, then in fraction r/s, s will just be reduced and we get an integer. Sufficient.

(2) Every prime factor of s is also a prime factor of r. The powers of prime factors of s could be higher than powers of prime factors of r. eg 25/125=1/5 not an integer. Not sufficient.

Re: If r and s are positive integers, is r/s an integer? [#permalink]
11 Apr 2012, 12:25

Bunuel what about the word "every" - according to this i picked up numbers which satisfied this condition. And one more point-official explanation "takes" the numbers 18 and 8, to explain the answer. But 18 has the prime factors 2 and 3, but 8 hasn't 3 as a prime factor - what means not every factor of x is also a prime factor of y - and this contradicts with the statement I just need to clarify -to avoid such a confusion on the exam

Re: If r and s are positive integers, is r/s an integer? [#permalink]
11 Apr 2012, 12:28

Expert's post

Galiya wrote:

Bunuel what about the word "every" - according to this i picked up numbers which satisfied this condition. And one more point-official explanation "takes" the numbers 18 and 8, to explain the answer. But 18 has the prime factors 2 and 3, but 8 hasn't 3 as a prime factor - what means not every factor of x is also a prime factor of y - and this contradicts with the statement I just need to clarify -to avoid such a confusion on the exam

Let's refer to the question in the initial post: which statement are you talking about? _________________

Re: If r and s are positive integers, is r/s an integer? [#permalink]
11 Apr 2012, 12:40

Expert's post

Galiya wrote:

i mean this one (2) Every prime factor of s is also a prime factor of r.

There is an example given in my post which satisfies the given condition and doesn't give an integer value of r/s.

(2) Every prime factor of s is also a prime factor of r. The powers of prime factors of s could be higher than powers of prime factors of r.

For example: if s=5^3 and r=5^2 then every prime of 125 (in fact its only prime 5) IS also a prime of 25 but r/s=25/125 is not an integer. _________________

Re: If r and s are positive integers, is r/s an integer? [#permalink]
24 Aug 2012, 01:04

Expert's post

KAS1 wrote:

What if S>R? It doesn't say that R>S. It just says they are positive integers.

For first statement: R>S = 20/10 = 2 --> Integer S>R = 10/20 = .5 --> Not an integer

For the second statement: R>S = 50/5 = 10 --> Integer S>R = 5/50 = .5 --> Not an integer

That is why I picked E. Can you please explain why my reasoning is incorrect? Thanks!

For the first statement s cannot be greater than r. If every factor of s is also factor of r, then r\geq{s}. Your example, (r=10 and s=20), is not possible, because 4 is a factor of s but not a factor of r.

Re: If a and b are positive integers, is ‘a’ a multiple of b? [#permalink]
25 Sep 2012, 10:24

ankit0411 wrote:

If a and b are positive integers, is ‘a’ a multiple of b?

(1) Every prime factor of b is also a prime factor of a (2) Every factor of b is also a factor of a

(1) Consider for example a = 2\cdot3=6 and b = 2^2\cdot3=12, so obviously a is not a multiple of b. If a = 12 and b = 6, then of course a is a multiple of b. Not sufficient.

(2) b is a factor of itself, so it is also a factor of a, which means that a is a multiple of b. Sufficient.

Answer B. _________________

PhD in Applied Mathematics Love GMAT Quant questions and running.

Re: If r and s are positive integers, is r/s an integer? [#permalink]
12 Jan 2014, 05:35

BANON wrote:

If r and s are positive integers, is r/s an integer?

(1) Every factor of s is also a factor of r. (2) Every prime factor of s is also a prime factor of r.

Basically, the question asks us if s is a factor of r.

1) This is significant, because we are told something about every factor of s. Let's say the products of the factors of s = n, then 1) gives us n*r.. is n*r/n an integer? Of course.. So 1) is sufficient

2) This only tells us a fraction of the information that 1) tells us, since 2) restricts the factors to primes.. But we don't know if s has other factors that are NOT shared by r, and thus 2) is insufficient..

Re: If r and s are positive integers, is r/s an integer? [#permalink]
04 May 2014, 10:23

Bunuel wrote:

If r and s are positive integers, is r/s an integer?

(1) Every factor of s is also a factor of r. If every factor of s is also factor of r, then in fraction r/s, s will just be reduced and we get an integer. Sufficient.

(2) Every prime factor of s is also a prime factor of r. The powers of prime factors of s could be higher than powers of prime factors of r. eg 25/125=1/5 not an integer. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunuel,

If we look at the two statements above: (1) Every factor of s is also a factor of r. (2) Every prime factor of s is also a prime factor of r.

I'm having a hard time differentiating the two statements. I realize that one is talking about PF and one is talking about All Factors, but how can we assume that in statement 2, S could have it's factors raised to a higher value. Isn't the verbiage between 1 and 2 identical?

Re: If r and s are positive integers, is r/s an integer? [#permalink]
05 May 2014, 01:40

Expert's post

russ9 wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

If r and s are positive integers, is r/s an integer?

(1) Every factor of s is also a factor of r. If every factor of s is also factor of r, then in fraction r/s, s will just be reduced and we get an integer. Sufficient.

(2) Every prime factor of s is also a prime factor of r. The powers of prime factors of s could be higher than powers of prime factors of r. eg 25/125=1/5 not an integer. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunuel,

If we look at the two statements above: (1) Every factor of s is also a factor of r. (2) Every prime factor of s is also a prime factor of r.

I'm having a hard time differentiating the two statements. I realize that one is talking about PF and one is talking about All Factors, but how can we assume that in statement 2, S could have it's factors raised to a higher value. Isn't the verbiage between 1 and 2 identical?

No, they are not identical.

(2) says that r and s have the same primes but this does not mean that r and s have the same factors. For, example, 2, 4, 8, 16, ..., 2^n all have the same prime: 2. But they certainly do not share all their factors: the factors of 8 (1, 2, 4, 8) are not the same as the factors of 4 (1, 2, 4).

Re: If r and s are positive integers, is r/s an integer? [#permalink]
26 Jul 2014, 10:21

Factors of 4 is 1, 2 and 4. Factors of 6 is 1, 2, 3 and 6. Therefore, your example is not a true representation of statement 1. If every factor of s is also a factor of r, then what it is really saying is that r is a multiple of s, i.e. Factor of s=4 is 1, 2 and 4. Factor of r=8 is 1, 2, 4 and 8, while r=12 has factors 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 12. Since multiples are defined as whole numbers, it is sufficient.

Statement 2 is not sufficient since it is simply stating that each prime factor of s is also a prime factor of r. It does not state how many of each prime factor is present.