if r@s = rs+r+s, then for what value of s is r@sm equal to r : Quant Question Archive [LOCKED]
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 21 Jan 2017, 09:53

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# if r@s = rs+r+s, then for what value of s is r@sm equal to r

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 197
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 0

if r@s = rs+r+s, then for what value of s is r@sm equal to r [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2006, 10:54
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

if r@s = rs+r+s, then for what value of s is r@sm equal to r for all values of r?

-1
0
1
1/(r+1)
r
SVP
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 1743
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 317 [0], given: 49

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2006, 12:17
It is either i cant figure it out at all

or something is wrong about the question ...can you plz revise it
Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 57
Location: Moscow, Russia
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2006, 12:56
lan583 wrote:
if r@s = rs+r+s, then for what value of s is r@sm equal to r for all values of r?

-1
0
1
1/(r+1)
r

Apllying the defined operation we get:

find s such that

rsm+r+sm = r

holds for every r

since we know nothing about the "m" part of it, plugging in 1/-1/won't help 'cause m can still be anything and upset the equality.

only 0 works because them the 1st and 3rd terms are always zero and r=r, hich is always true

_________________

________________________________
"Amicus Plato, sed magic amica veritas"

SVP
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 1743
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 317 [0], given: 49

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2006, 13:09
I think C is the right answer and the clue is ( for all values of r)

because without this statment ( we could have assumed that r =zero

and thus we can never solve it
06 Sep 2006, 13:09
Display posts from previous: Sort by