If (r+t)/(r-t)>0, is r>t? (1) t>0 (2) r>0 : DS Archive
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 05:22

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If (r+t)/(r-t)>0, is r>t? (1) t>0 (2) r>0

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 357
Location: Illinois
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

If (r+t)/(r-t)>0, is r>t? (1) t>0 (2) r>0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2004, 11:42
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

If (r+t)/(r-t)>0, is r>t?

(1) t>0
(2) r>0
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 273
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2004, 13:16
A is insuff. R can be positive and large then T, or negative and smaller than T.

B IS sufficient.

I choose B. ( if T is Bigger than R, than numerator is positive, denom is negative) By contradiction.
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 393
Location: Bangalore, India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2004, 10:52
Yes..it is B I believe. First I was tempted to go for E.
Agree with the reasons given by others..

gmatblast wrote:
If (r+t)/(r-t)>0, is r>t?

(1) t>0
(2) r>0

_________________

Awaiting response,

Thnx & Rgds,
Chandra

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 353
Location: Manhattan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2004, 17:23
1.5 min
B
plugged in 2 for t and got my answer by some minor plumbing for r
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5062
Location: Singapore
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 355 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2004, 18:41
(r+t)/(r-t) > 0
(r+t) > 0
r > -t

From (1), if t > 0, then t will have values 1,2,3... and -t will have values -1,-2,-3...
But we do not have a range for r. r could be having values 0,1,2,3,4... in which case it satisfies the equation
Conversely, r could be -3 when t is -2 and so smaller than -t
Therefore (1) is not sufficient.

From (2), we are told r > 0, so we know for sure it is bigger than any negative value and satisfies the equation.

And when we satisfy (r+t)/(r-t)>0, we will know r > t because if this isn't so, (r+t)/(r-t) may be < 0.
26 Aug 2004, 18:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by