Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: If S is a sequence of consecutive multiples of 3 [#permalink]
17 Jun 2014, 13:52

Expert's post

If S is a sequence of consecutive multiples of 3, how many multiples of 9 are there in S?

(1) There are 15 terms in S.

In every set of 3 consecutive multiples of 3, there will be one multiple of 9: {-9, -6, -3} {-6, -3, 0} {-3, 0, 3} {0, 3, 6} {3, 6, 9} ...

15 consecutive multiples of 3 could be break down into 5 different such sets, each of which will contain 1 multiple of 9. Therefore, there are 5 multiples of 9 in the set. Sufficient.

(2) The greatest term of S is 126. Clearly insufficient.

Re: If S is a sequence of consecutive multiples of 3 [#permalink]
17 Jun 2014, 14:05

ajithkumar wrote:

If S is a sequence of consecutive multiples of 3, how many multiples of 9 are there in S?

(1) There are 15 terms in S.

(2) The greatest term of S is 126.

I don't agree with the official answer. Any thoughts on this question?

Indeed the correct answer is (A) because whatever sequence with 15 terms you pick you will always have 5 multiples of 9, whether you start the sequence with a multiple of 9 or not (there's a pattern: every 3 numbers there's a multiple of 9 and in a 15 terms there're 5 sets of 3 terms ) Hope that helps _________________

Re: If S is a sequence of consecutive multiples of 3 [#permalink]
17 Jun 2014, 15:31

Bunuel wrote:

If S is a sequence of consecutive multiples of 3, how many multiples of 9 are there in S?

(1) There are 15 terms in S.

In every set of 3 consecutive multiples of 3, there will be one multiple of 9: {-9, -6, -3} {-6, -3, 0} {-3, 0, 3} {0, 3, 6} {3, 6, 9} ...

15 consecutive multiples of 3 could be break down into 5 different such sets, each of which will contain 1 multiple of 9. Therefore, there are 5 multiples of 9 in the set. Sufficient.

(2) The greatest term of S is 126. Clearly insufficient.

Answer: A.

{-6, -3, 0} {-3,0,3} in these sets there are no multiples of 9..

Re: If S is a sequence of consecutive multiples of 3 [#permalink]
17 Jun 2014, 15:32

clipea12 wrote:

ajithkumar wrote:

If S is a sequence of consecutive multiples of 3, how many multiples of 9 are there in S?

(1) There are 15 terms in S.

(2) The greatest term of S is 126.

I don't agree with the official answer. Any thoughts on this question?

Indeed the correct answer is (A) because whatever sequence with 15 terms you pick you will always have 5 multiples of 9, whether you start the sequence with a multiple of 9 or not (there's a pattern: every 3 numbers there's a multiple of 9 and in a 15 terms there're 5 sets of 3 terms ) Hope that helps

you are not considering 0, and negative multiples of 3. So the answer should be C

Re: If S is a sequence of consecutive multiples of 3 [#permalink]
17 Jun 2014, 15:38

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

ajithkumar wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

If S is a sequence of consecutive multiples of 3, how many multiples of 9 are there in S?

(1) There are 15 terms in S.

In every set of 3 consecutive multiples of 3, there will be one multiple of 9: {-9, -6, -3} {-6, -3, 0} {-3, 0, 3} {0, 3, 6} {3, 6, 9} ...

15 consecutive multiples of 3 could be break down into 5 different such sets, each of which will contain 1 multiple of 9. Therefore, there are 5 multiples of 9 in the set. Sufficient.

(2) The greatest term of S is 126. Clearly insufficient.

Answer: A.

{-6, -3, 0} {-3,0,3} in these sets there are no multiples of 9..

So the answer is C isn't it?

0 is divisible by EVERY integer except 0 itself, (or, which is the same, zero is a multiple of every integer except zero itself).

Re: If S is a sequence of consecutive multiples of 3 [#permalink]
18 Jun 2014, 01:27

Expert's post

pretzel wrote:

For the second statement, 126 terms can be divided into 42 sets isn't it?

The second statement does not say that there are 126 terms in the set. It says that the greatest term of S is 126, there can be any number of elements. _________________

If S is a sequence of consecutive multiples [#permalink]
19 Aug 2014, 03:59

If S is a sequence of consecutive multiples of 3, how many multiples of 9 are there in S?

(1) There are 15 terms in S.

(2) The greatest term of S is 126.

1) statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked; 2) statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked; 3) BOTH statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question asked, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient to answer the question asked; 4) EACH statement ALONE is sufficient to answer the question asked; 5) statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question asked, and additional data specific to the problem are needed.

Re: If S is a sequence of consecutive multiples of 3 [#permalink]
19 Aug 2014, 04:01

Expert's post

Saulius1 wrote:

If S is a sequence of consecutive multiples of 3, how many multiples of 9 are there in S?

(1) There are 15 terms in S.

(2) The greatest term of S is 126.

1) statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked; 2) statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked; 3) BOTH statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question asked, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient to answer the question asked; 4) EACH statement ALONE is sufficient to answer the question asked; 5) statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question asked, and additional data specific to the problem are needed.

Merging similar topics. Please refer to the discussion above. _________________

Hey everyone, today’s post focuses on the interview process. As I get ready for interviews at Kellogg and Tuck (and TheEngineerMBA ramps up for his HBS... ...

I got invited to interview at Sloan! The date is October 31st. So, with my Kellogg interview scheduled for this Wednesday morning, and my MIT Sloan interview scheduled...

Not all good communicators are leaders, but all leaders are good communicators. Communication is an essential tool that leaders need to use in order to get anything done. Almost...

Despite being a long weekend with Thanksgiving, this week was very tiring for me in various ways. Besides the pressure of learning materials I am not familiar with such...