Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

If S is a set of Four numbers w,x,y, and z, is the range of [#permalink]
24 Aug 2010, 18:33

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

65% (02:02) correct
35% (00:40) wrong based on 79 sessions

If S is a set of Four numbers w,x,y, and z, is the range of the numbers in S greater than 2?

(1) w-z>2 (2) z is the least number in S.

If a problem says "S is a set of four numbers w,x,y,z...." Must one assume that w,x,y,z are 4 distinct numbers? Meaning w,x,y,z cannot be 3,3,3, and 3?

Re: If S is a set of Four numbers w,x,y, and z, is the range of [#permalink]
25 Aug 2010, 02:25

Statement 1:

The range is defined as the difference between the largest and the smallest number of a set. Since the difference between w and z is greater than 2, the range must exceed 2. => Sufficient

Statement 2:

Doesn't tell us anything about the other numbers in the set except for z. => Inusufficient

Hence, choice A is correct.

To answer your question, unless it is explicitly stated otherwise, different variables (such as w,x,z, etc.) can represent the same numbers. If this were not the case, the solution to the above problem would be D (i.e. both statements alone sufficient), not A.

Re: If S is a set of Four numbers w,x,y, and z, is the range of [#permalink]
25 Aug 2010, 03:12

Expert's post

vachir wrote:

If S is a set of Four numbers w,x,y, and z, is the range of the numbers in S greater than 2? 1) w-z>2 2) z is the least number in S.

If a problem says "S is a set of four numbers w,x,y,z...." Must one assume that w,x,y,z are 4 distinct numbers? Meaning w,x,y,z cannot be 3,3,3, and 3?

Thank you!

stanford2012 wrote:

Statement 1:

The range is defined as the difference between the largest and the smallest number of a set. Since the difference between w and z is greater than 2, the range must exceed 2. => Sufficient

Statement 2:

Doesn't tell us anything about the other numbers in the set except for z. => Inusufficient

Hence, choice A is correct.

To answer your question, unless it is explicitly stated otherwise, different variables (such as w,x,z, etc.) can represent the same numbers. If this were not the case, the solution to the above problem would be D (i.e. both statements alone sufficient), not A.

Above reasoning is correct and answer is A. Though I have little correction: even if it were stated that w, x, y, and z represent distinct numbers answer still would be A, as statement (2) would just tell us that from those four distinct unknowns z is the smallest one (obviously one of unknowns would be the smallest one, what difference it makes to know that it's z?).

If it were stated that w, x, y, and z are distinct integers then yes answer would be D, but in this case question does not makes any sense as stem would be enough to answer the question: any set with 4 distinct integers has a range more than or equal to 3.

Re: If S is a set of Four numbers w,x,y, and z, is the range of [#permalink]
23 Oct 2014, 10:42

Hi, I still am not convinced with the answer as "A" since it is not mentioned the set A has consecutive numbers the set may have A =(w,x,y,z) = (2,100,25,0)

in this case W=2 is not the largest number.

do we assume that W is the largest number? Please help me understand if i am going wrong.

Re: If S is a set of Four numbers w,x,y, and z, is the range of [#permalink]
24 Oct 2014, 02:06

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

Nab77 wrote:

Hi, I still am not convinced with the answer as "A" since it is not mentioned the set A has consecutive numbers the set may have A =(w,x,y,z) = (2,100,25,0)

in this case W=2 is not the largest number.

do we assume that W is the largest number? Please help me understand if i am going wrong.

It's not necessary w to be the largest number. Check complete solution below.

If S is a set of four numbers w, x, y, and z, is the range of the numbers in S greater than 2 ?

(1) w - z > 2. The range of a set is the difference between the largest and the smallest elements of the set, since the difference of some particular two numbers are already more than 2 then the the range must also be more than 2. Sufficient.

(2) z is the least number in S --> just says that from four unknowns z is the smallest one (obviously one of the unknowns would be the smallest one, what difference does it make to know that it's z?). Not sufficient.

On September 6, 2015, I started my MBA journey at London Business School. I took some pictures on my way from the airport to school, and uploaded them on...

When I was growing up, I read a story about a piccolo player. A master orchestra conductor came to town and he decided to practice with the largest orchestra...

I’ll start off with a quote from another blog post I’ve written : “not all great communicators are great leaders, but all great leaders are great communicators.” Being...