Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 26 Aug 2016, 23:45

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 02 Jan 2009
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2009, 06:21
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

60% (01:22) correct 40% (01:29) wrong based on 11 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she would be famous. She is not a concert pianist since she is not famous.
The conclusion above is unsound because the author does not consider that
(A) Sarah could be a famous actress.
(B) Sarah could be a harpist for a major orchestra.
(C) Sarah could be a pianist with a rock group.
(D) Sarah could be a concert pianist with a minor orchestra.
(E) Sarah could be famous for another reason.

Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 111
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 184 [1] , given: 0

Re: CR - concert pianist [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2009, 07:49
1
KUDOS
Hi janet1511,

Here's my explanation:
-------------------------
Premise 1: A person who is a concert pianist with a major orchestra is famous.
Premise 2: She is not famous.

Conclusion: She is not a concert pianist.

Let us solve this using Venn diagram. Consider a circle called 'Famous'. Another circle called 'major orchestra' (MAJ_ORCH). Let there be a third circle called 'minor orchestra' (MIN_ORCH).

Now according to premise 1, we can visualize the circle MAJ_ORCH completely inside the circle called 'Famous'. This is so because any person who is a concert pianist with a major orchestra IS famous. There is NO concert pianist with a major orchestra who is not famous. Everyone is!

Premise 1 does not say that 'A concert pianist who is NOT associated with a major orchestra cannot be famous'. Even they can be famous. We'll use this to show that option D was something that the author did not consider to arrive at the conclusion.

Now if we consider option D, we can safely think of a circle MIN_ORCH, which intersects (not overlaps) another circle Famous. This 'intersection' denotes that concert pianists who are working with 'minor orchestra' (MIN_ORCH) comprises 'Famous' & 'Not Famous' people.

Let Sarah be associated with 'minor orchestra' group. Now since premise 2 states that Sarah is not famous, she'll be a part of the circle MIN_ORCH, which is not common with the 'Famous' circle i.e., Sarah is a part of 'minor orchestra' and is NOT famous.

(A) Sarah could be a famous actress. ---> Not relevant. We should not change Sarah's occupation. Let her be pianist for the time being.

(B) Sarah could be a harpist for a major orchestra. ---> Not relevant. Why harpist? She is fine as a pianist.

(C) Sarah could be a pianist with a rock group. ---> So what? Even if she's with a rock group, how does it, in any way, make the conclusion unsound?

(D) Sarah could be a concert pianist with a minor orchestra. ---> Explained above

(E) Sarah could be famous for another reason. ---> Sarah is 'not' famous for any other reason as Premise 2 clearly rules this out. So, we can discard this out.

My choice is option D.

Hope that helps.

Regards,
Technext
_________________

+++ Believe me, it doesn't take much of an effort to underline SC questions. Just try it out. +++
+++ Please tell me why other options are wrong. +++

~~~ The only way to get smarter is to play a smarter opponent. ~~~

Intern
Joined: 11 Feb 2009
Posts: 13
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - concert pianist [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2009, 08:46
I totally agree with the answer choice and reasoning. Still, I would like to slightly shift the explanation in a way that seems easier to me to grasp.
Let Sarah be A and B - the set of all possible concert pianist ocupations (e.g. a concert pianist for a minor orchestra, a concert pianist for a major orchestra, a concert pianist for some other type of orchestra, etc.). Then, let b1 denote the quality of being a concert pianist for a major orchestra, b2 - a concert pianist for a minor orchestra, ... etc.
The premise can be depicted as If A is b1, then ---> famous (If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she would be famous).
Then, the conclusion made by the author could be desplayed as A is not B because A is not famous (She is not a concert pianist since she is not famous). By substituting the condition for the conclusion from If A is b1, then ---> famous for a portion of the conclusion in A is not B because A is not famous, that is famous, we have A is not B because A is not b1 or this could be rephrased as Sarah is not a concert pianist since she is not a concert pianist for a major orchestra, which is unsound. It is incorrect because for Sarah to belong into B she could also be b2 or any other element od B set. Therefore, the author's resoning is missing out on the point that she, for example, could be a concert pianist with a minor orchestra which is provided by D choice.
VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1431
Followers: 40

Kudos [?]: 329 [0], given: 1

Re: CR - concert pianist [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2009, 10:48
cp for a Major O -> Famous (given)

Contrapostive is

~ Famous -> ~ cp for a Major O (derived from given)

Possible that she is still a CP but not for Major O

Hence D
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 9238
Followers: 803

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Re: If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2015, 05:50
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she   [#permalink] 19 Feb 2015, 05:50
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
9 If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she 16 04 Jun 2008, 16:51
If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she 4 18 Feb 2008, 06:17
3 If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she 5 09 Feb 2008, 03:54
If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she 9 13 Jun 2007, 04:32
If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she 10 31 Oct 2006, 05:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by