Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 21:35

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 656
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2004, 12:10
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (01:41) wrong based on 1 sessions
If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothesтАФall are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.

17. Which one of the following is an assumption made by the author of the passage?

(A) The arts of life have no useful end.

(B) The artificial is not better than the natural.

(C) Digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes are better than nature.

(D) The injunction to follow nature should not be violated.

(E) The arts of life are indirect means of following nature.



18. If the authorтАЩs argument were challenged on the grounds that the construction of buildings has adverse effects on the natural environment, which of the following replies might the author use to respond to the challenge logically?

(A) There are human activities, such as making music, that are environmentally harmless.

(B) Harming the environment is not an end, of purpose, of the arts of life.

(C) The construction could involve the use of natural, not artificial, materials.

(D) Constructing buildings is not an тАЬart of life.тАЭ

(E) Even if the natural environment is disturbed by the construction of buildings, it is improved for human use.

What is the meaning of the phrase "to what end are all the arts of life?"
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 503
Location: 55405
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2004, 12:20
Those are two difficult questions.

By POE, I get C and B, but I suspect that I'm wrong.

These are Studa questions?

"To what end are all the arts of life?" means, more or less, "What good are the arts of life?", "What is the purpose of the arts of life?" or "What are the arts of life for?"
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 656
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2004, 12:57
stoolfi wrote:

"To what end are all the arts of life?" means, more or less, "What good are the arts of life?", "What is the purpose of the arts of life?" or "What are the arts of life for?"


Then, can the premise
"If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life?"
be losely construed as
"If the artificial is not better than the natural, then aritfical is no good"
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2004, 13:05
For the first question, B cannot be the answer as it is a restatement of the premise rather than an assumption. C should be the answer to the first question because if you try to negate it, you will destroy the very argument that the author is trying to prove, that Digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes, which are artificial and arts of life, are not better than the natural. Still working on the second one which is giving me the goose bumps :?
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Aug 2003
Posts: 325
Location: dallas , tx
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2004, 17:09
I go with C for the first one. not sure abt 2nd qustion
_________________

shubhangi

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Posts: 462
Location: In the middle of nowhere
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2004, 19:57
A for the first one and E for the 2 nd one...

The first was quite mind-boggling.... :wall

Vivek.
_________________

"Start By Doing What Is Necessary ,Then What Is Possible & Suddenly You Will Realise That You Are Doing The Impossible"

GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 771
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

Re: LS-T1-CR4-17& 18 [#permalink] New post 03 Feb 2004, 03:56
kpadma wrote:
If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothesтАФall are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.

17. Which one of the following is an assumption made by the author of the passage?

(A) The arts of life have no useful end.

(B) The artificial is not better than the natural.

(C) Digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes are better than nature.

(D) The injunction to follow nature should not be violated.

(E) The arts of life are indirect means of following nature.



18. If the authorтАЩs argument were challenged on the grounds that the construction of buildings has adverse effects on the natural environment, which of the following replies might the author use to respond to the challenge logically?

(A) There are human activities, such as making music, that are environmentally harmless.

(B) Harming the environment is not an end, of purpose, of the arts of life.

(C) The construction could involve the use of natural, not artificial, materials.

(D) Constructing buildings is not an тАЬart of life.тАЭ

(E) Even if the natural environment is disturbed by the construction of buildings, it is improved for human use.

What is the meaning of the phrase "to what end are all the arts of life?"


C and E.The rhetorical question is the first passage asks if "technology" didn't improve life, then why did it evolve in the first place? The unstated/implied assumption is that "arts of life" clearly and obviously are an improvement over raw nature. Hence, while stating the "clothing, et al" violate the "injuction" to follow nature, he implies that there is no reason to follow such injunction if our lives are clearly improved. Another way of analyzing this is to restate the author's point in pure logic:

Premise: If "arts of life" are not better than nature, then we would not have adopted "arts of life" in our culture. (Not P->Not Q)
Premise: We have adopted "arts of life" in our culture. (Q)
Conclusion: "arts of life" are better than nature (P: contrapositive of 1st premise, hence a valid conclusion).

Hence, C is the only choice that fits that interpretation of the stimulus.

Consequently, it is clear that the more important criterion for the author is whether something improves life for humans, not whether it is "natural" (he couldn't care less). This lead to the conclusion that the author would agree most with choice E in the second passage.
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 656
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Re: LS-T1-CR4-17& 18 [#permalink] New post 03 Feb 2004, 14:35
AkamaiBrah wrote:
C and E.The rhetorical question is the first passage asks if "technology" didn't improve life, then why did it evolve in the first place? The unstated/implied assumption is that "arts of life" clearly and obviously are an improvement over raw nature. Hence, while stating the "clothing, et al" violate the "injuction" to follow nature, he implies that there is no reason to follow such injunction if our lives are clearly improved. Another way of analyzing this is to restate the author's point in pure logic:

Premise: If "arts of life" are not better than nature, then we would not have adopted "arts of life" in our culture. (Not P->Not Q)
Premise: We have adopted "arts of life" in our culture. (Q)
Conclusion: "arts of life" are better than nature (P: contrapositive of 1st premise, hence a valid conclusion).

Hence, C is the only choice that fits that interpretation of the stimulus.

Consequently, it is clear that the more important criterion for the author is whether something improves life for humans, not whether it is "natural" (he couldn't care less). This lead to the conclusion that the author would agree most with choice E in the second passage.


What a splindid explanation! Thanks !!
Re: LS-T1-CR4-17& 18   [#permalink] 03 Feb 2004, 14:35
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what gmatcracker2010 5 13 Jun 2010, 00:25
If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what tkarthi4u 1 21 Jun 2009, 01:21
2 If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what tenaman10 7 17 Jun 2009, 06:38
5 If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what bsd_lover 10 29 May 2008, 23:28
1 If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what neelabhmahesh 8 29 Jan 2008, 00:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.