|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 440
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 0
|
If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city [#permalink]
02 Nov 2006, 05:34
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city revenues will surely increase, since studies have conclusively shown that, if such parking regulations are put into effect, there is an increase in parking violations, and an increase in parking violations will result in a greater number of parking fines collected.
Which one of the following is closest, in terms of its logical features, to the reasoning used in the argument above?
(A) Last year’s increase in revenues can be easily explained. That was the year the city council instituted new parking regulations. No doubt the new law brought with it an increase in the number of parking violations.
(B) If taxes were increased, this act would naturally result in increased revenues for the city, and increased revenues would make some desirable social programs possible. So, if taxes were increased, some desirable social programs would become possible.
(C) Henry says that, if the city council goes into closed session, an important matter of personnel policy is being discussed. However, no personnel matters were discussed at the council meeting, so if Henry is right, the council did not go into closed session.
(D) All cars parked on the north side of the street were ticketed last night, and the same cars were towed away this morning. So beware! A car ticketed in this city also gets towed away.
(E) Allen says that, if the city council institutes new parking regulations, it is unlikely that revenues for the city will increase. If Allen is right, then the parking regulation plan should not be instituted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 1124
Schools: Chicago Booth
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
38
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR - City Council [#permalink]
02 Nov 2006, 05:40
arjsingh1976 wrote: If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city revenues will surely increase, since studies have conclusively shown that, if such parking regulations are put into effect, there is an increase in parking violations, and an increase in parking violations will result in a greater number of parking fines collected.
Which one of the following is closest, in terms of its logical features, to the reasoning used in the argument above? (A) Last year’s increase in revenues can be easily explained. That was the year the city council instituted new parking regulations. No doubt the new law brought with it an increase in the number of parking violations. (B) If taxes were increased, this act would naturally result in increased revenues for the city, and increased revenues would make some desirable social programs possible. So, if taxes were increased, some desirable social programs would become possible. (C) Henry says that, if the city council goes into closed session, an important matter of personnel policy is being discussed. However, no personnel matters were discussed at the council meeting, so if Henry is right, the council did not go into closed session. (D) All cars parked on the north side of the street were ticketed last night, and the same cars were towed away this morning. So beware! A car ticketed in this city also gets towed away. (E) Allen says that, if the city council institutes new parking regulations, it is unlikely that revenues for the city will increase. If Allen is right, then the parking regulation plan should not be instituted.
C)
A causes B and B causes C, therefore A causes C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1026
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 0
|
I would bet on B.
It depends roughly on the same logic as argument:
A leads to B
B leades to C.
Hence, A leads to C.
_________________
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 1124
Schools: Chicago Booth
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
38
[0], given: 0
|
ak_idc wrote: I would bet on B.
It depends roughly on the same logic as argument:
A leads to B B leades to C. Hence, A leads to C.
I meant B, not C. Honestly, I did!
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1481
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
59
[0], given: 13
|
Another B from me..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 718
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 0
|
Yes B sounds good
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 159
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
B follows the same pattern of logic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 92
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
B for me 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 758
Location: Dallas, Texas
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
The logial pattern is if A then B ; if B then C ; therefore if A then C
if parking regulations are put into effect, there is an increase in parking violations,
and if an increase in parking violations then a greater number of parking fines collected.
Therefore if parking regulations then more money from fine.
(B) If taxes were increased, this act would naturally result in increased revenues for the city,
if increased revenues then some desirable social programs possible.
Therefore if taxes were increased, some desirable social programs would become possible.
_________________
"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 536
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
Straight B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 12 May 2006
Posts: 186
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR - City Council [#permalink]
08 Jun 2008, 08:21
Guys,
Can someone explain why A is not the answer as it also follows the same pattern.
New parking regulation => increase in parking violations => increased revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 01 May 2008
Posts: 114
Location: São Paulo
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR - City Council [#permalink]
08 Jun 2008, 14:55
Another B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 747
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
65
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR - City Council [#permalink]
10 Jun 2008, 23:00
B,
anyone having OA/OE for this question?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: CR - City Council
[#permalink]
10 Jun 2008, 23:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar topics |
Author |
Replies |
Last post |
|
Similar Topics:
|
|
|
|
If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city
|
asandeep |
9 |
10 Dec 2003, 12:07 |
|
|
|
If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city
|
gmat_crack |
4 |
21 Feb 2006, 20:07 |
|
|
|
If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city
|
alimad |
4 |
23 Jul 2007, 13:02 |
|
|
|
If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city
|
financeguy |
8 |
15 Sep 2007, 04:59 |
|
|
|
If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city
|
noboru |
10 |
28 Jul 2009, 11:29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|