Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Sep 2014, 03:55

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

If the ice of Greenland and Antartica were to melt, the sea

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 252
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

If the ice of Greenland and Antartica were to melt, the sea [#permalink] New post 06 Dec 2003, 19:49
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:45) wrong based on 1 sessions
If the ice of Greenland and Antartica were to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet or more.

A. If the ice of Greenland and Antartica were to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet or more.
B. Were the ice of Greenland and Antartica to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet.
C. Was the ice of Greenland and Antartica to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet or more.
D. If the ice of Greenland and Antartica was melting, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet.
E. Should the ice of Greenland and Antartica melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet or more.

Don't forget to include your explanations.
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3470
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 670 [0], given: 781

Re: SC: Greenland and Antartica [#permalink] New post 06 Dec 2003, 20:14
pitts20042006 wrote:
If the ice of Greenland and Antartica were to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet or more.

a. same
B. Were the ice of Greenland and Antartica to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet.
C. Was the ice of Greenland and Antartica to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet or more.
D. If the ice of Greenland and Antartica was melting, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet.
E. Should the ice of Greenland and Antartica melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet or more.

Don't forget to include your explanations.



Subjunctive , pitts, read about subjunctive mood

this is a hypothetical situation.

correct verb is "were"..not "was"

also, atleast is enough...we dont need "atleast 100 feet or more"

B is best.

good enough?

thanks
praetorian
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 252
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Dec 2003, 20:43
I posted this question because the answer given is D :cry: .. which has to be wrong. Thanks for confirming that.

Also wanted to know, what if A reads "If the ice of Greenland and Antartica were to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet. "

Then which one is better A or B??
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3470
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 670 [0], given: 781

 [#permalink] New post 06 Dec 2003, 20:53
pitts20042006 wrote:
I posted this question because the answer given is D :cry: .. which has to be wrong. Thanks for confirming that.


Frankly, i didnt like B too much. i wouldnt write this sentence like this.
But as is , B is indeed the better choice.

i really think ...in D, "were" should have been there.
Where'd you get this?

Quote:
Also wanted to know, what if A reads "If the ice of Greenland and Antartica were to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet. "


In this case, A would be the best.

Good questions..
Do keep posting
praetorian
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 265
Location: sydney
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Dec 2003, 02:59
hey when there is a hypothetical situation we have to use "were", irrespective of plural or singular subject.

A is correct and idomatic.
_________________

When u r about to make ends meet, someone moves the ends.

CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3470
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 670 [0], given: 781

 [#permalink] New post 07 Dec 2003, 03:02
mbamantra wrote:
hey when there is a hypothetical situation we have to use "were", irrespective of plural or singular subject.

A is correct and idomatic.


Hmm...i see A has "atleast 100 feet or more"

i think or more is redundant.

"Atleast 100 feet" is enough.

thanks
praetorian
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1613
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Dec 2003, 04:03
Agree with B although I have read that such constructions as WERE IT TO DO is less preferable than is IF IT WERE TO DO. However, among the given options, B is the best.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Jun 2004
Posts: 169
Location: Noida, UP
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Aug 2004, 11:46
I was going through this questioon today, and marked E as the answer. I believe if people are not really happy with B, perhaps another look at E would help. I feel its the best way to put the sentence.

Any reasons why E should not be the correct choice?
_________________

--

./abisurd
Not absurd :)

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 182
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Aug 2004, 12:10
Any sentence formation with redundancy " atleast 100 feet or more" is wrong. "atleast 100 feet" means even that "or more".

I am very sure that B is not a way a subjunctive formation should me.

A would have been the best way to handle subjunctive, but it is redundant in a way.

I am choosing B because it doesnt harm any rule even though sentence structure is slightly new..

My choice is B
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3470
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 670 [0], given: 781

 [#permalink] New post 09 Aug 2004, 13:43
abisurd wrote:
I was going through this questioon today, and marked E as the answer. I believe if people are not really happy with B, perhaps another look at E would help. I feel its the best way to put the sentence.

Any reasons why E should not be the correct choice?


IMO, "atleast 100 feet or more " is incorrect... Atleast 100 feet is good enough. We dont need "or more"

thats why E may not be correct

Thanks
Praetorian
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Jun 2004
Posts: 169
Location: Noida, UP
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Aug 2004, 20:38
Praetorian wrote:
mbamantra wrote:
hey when there is a hypothetical situation we have to use "were", irrespective of plural or singular subject.

A is correct and idomatic.


Hmm...i see A has "atleast 100 feet or more"

i think or more is redundant.

"Atleast 100 feet" is enough.

thanks
praetorian


Thanks Paret :)
_________________

--

./abisurd
Not absurd :)

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 971
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: Greenland and Antartica [#permalink] New post 09 Aug 2004, 21:02
the only choices possible are B and D.

B entails a subjunctive clause. Subjuctive is used for a supposition or what is contrary.
eg: If I were ten years younger, I would consider entering the marathon.

D has the indicative.
When the situation described by the if clause is not presupposed to be false, however, that clause must contain an indicative verb. -- courtesy bartleby.

D provides a situation that will result in another. D should be it.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 358
Location: Manhattan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2004, 14:21
I also put B down and remain unclear with why D is correct. DJ's explanation didn't clear this up...
  [#permalink] 10 Aug 2004, 14:21
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic If the ice of Greenland and Antarctica vards 1 29 Jun 2014, 13:43
If the ice of Greenland and Antarctica were to melt,the sravan_m444 7 06 Oct 2006, 06:34
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic It will not be possible to implicate melting sea ice in the TeHCM 11 15 Dec 2005, 00:11
1 If the ice of Greenland and Anartica were to melt, the sea wild_desperado 5 15 Jun 2005, 00:32
1 If the ice of Greenland and Antarctica were to melt, the sea KristinHR 12 06 Apr 2005, 14:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

If the ice of Greenland and Antartica were to melt, the sea

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.