Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 01:25 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 01:25

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 146
Own Kudos [?]: 723 [40]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92904
Own Kudos [?]: 618875 [9]
Given Kudos: 81592
Send PM
General Discussion
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92904
Own Kudos [?]: 618875 [1]
Given Kudos: 81592
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92904
Own Kudos [?]: 618875 [1]
Given Kudos: 81592
Send PM
Re: If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
TGC wrote:
Hi Bunuel,

I am still unable to get the solution.

When we can have an empty set {0} as a subset of each set, in that case we would have a average as 0 and thus consider the below example.

You have a set : {1,1,1}

One possible subset : {0}

Average of the set : 1

Average of subset:0

So still it exceeds the average of subset .

Can you advise on that?

Rgds,
TGC!


An empty set has no mean or the median.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92904
Own Kudos [?]: 618875 [1]
Given Kudos: 81592
Send PM
Re: If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Yash12345 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of set S , which of the following must be true about set S?

I. Set S contains only one element
II. All elements in set S are equal
III. The median of set S equals the mean of set S

A. none of the three qualities is necessary
B. II only
C. III only
D. II and III only
E. I, II, and III

"The mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of set S" --> set S can be:
A. \(S=\{x\}\) - S contains only one element (eg {7});
B. \(S=\{x, x, ...\}\) - S contains more than one element and all elements are equal (eg{7,7,7,7}).

Why is that? Because if set S contains two (or more) different elements, then we can always consider the subset with smallest number and the mean of this subset (mean of subset=smallest number) will be less than mean of entire set (mean of full set>smallest number).

Example: S={3, 5} --> mean of S=4. Pick subset with smallest number s'={3} --> mean of s'=3 --> 3<4.

Now let's consider the statements:

I. Set S contains only one element - not always true, we can have scenario B too (\(S=\{x, x, ...\}\));

II. All elements in set S are equal - true for both A and B scenarios, hence always true;

III. The median of set S equals the mean of set S - - true for both A and B scenarios, hence always true.

So statements II and III are always true.

Answer: D.

Also discussed here: ps-challenge-93565.html




hi bunuel , little confused here ..
Please explain me where am i going wrong.

I took the elements of set S={1,2,3,4)
And the subset elemets as ={2,3,4)

however this does not meet the second situation requirement. i.e. ( all elemets in set s are equal)


We are given that "the mean of set S does not exceed mean of ANY subset of set S".

Now, notice that S cannot be {1, 2, 3, 4), because it has subsets with the mean smaller than the mean of {1, 2, 3, 4):

Mean of S = 10/4 = 2.5. Mean of {1}, which is a subset of S, is 1 --> 2.5 > 1.

Does this make sense?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92904
Own Kudos [?]: 618875 [1]
Given Kudos: 81592
Send PM
Re: If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
vinraj wrote:
HI, Bunuel,

I dont understand how we can say that all elements in a set are equal in case of a set S={2} , which has only a single element.
Is this an established rule in Set Theory or is it a personal opinion.

If the set has just one element, then it is not comparable with anything else . So, according to English grammar & logic, it does not make sense to say that all elements are same in that Set.

Kindly tell me if this is an established Practice.. Thank you


Yes, if we have a set with just 1 element, we can say that all elements of the set are the same.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Posts: 88
Own Kudos [?]: 91 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Re: If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
angel2009 wrote:
If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of set S , which of the following must be true about set S ?

I. Set S contains only one element

II. All elements in set S are equal

III. The median of set S equals the mean of set S


A. none of the three qualities is necessary
B. II only
C. III only
D. II and III only
E. I, II, and III


"The mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of set S" --> set S can be:
A. \(S=\{x\}\) - S contains only one element (eg {7});
B. \(S=\{x, x, ...\}\) - S contains more than one element and all elements are equal (eg{7,7,7,7}).

Why is that? Because if set S contains two (or more) different elements, then we can always consider the subset with smallest number and the mean of this subset (mean of subset=smallest number) will be less than mean of entire set (mean of full set>smallest number).

Example: S={3, 5} --> mean of S=4. Pick subset with smallest number s'={3} --> mean of s'=3 --> 3<4.

Now let's consider the statements:

I. Set S contains only one element - not always true, we can have scenario B too (\(S=\{x, x, ...\}\));

II. All elements in set S are equal - true for both A and B scenarios, hence always true;

III. The median of set S equals the mean of set S - - true for both A and B scenarios, hence always true.

So statements II and III are always true.

Answer: D.



Why can't we consider the subset with the greatest number
Ex- S= (5,6,7) and subset s (7)
Please explain :?:
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 May 2010
Status:Simply - Chasing GMAT
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 281 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: International Business, Entrepreneurship
GMAT Date: 01-30-2012
GPA: 3
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of [#permalink]
Hi Bunuel,

Why the first statement is wrong...didn't understand.
I. Set S contains only one element.
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 615
Own Kudos [?]: 2930 [0]
Given Kudos: 25
Location: London
 Q51  V41
Send PM
Re: If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of [#permalink]
Because can contain the same element repeat an arbitrary number of times as well.
The set A={3,3,3,3,3} id different from B={3}

Yet in either case the condition of means is satisfied, whereas A has 5 elements and B has only 1
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 May 2010
Status:Simply - Chasing GMAT
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 281 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: International Business, Entrepreneurship
GMAT Date: 01-30-2012
GPA: 3
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of [#permalink]
Nope. Let's go my way...let say if set S={3}....then mean/median = 3 (this does satisfy with question stem "If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of set S")....then this is true.

please correct me if I am missing anything.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92904
Own Kudos [?]: 618875 [0]
Given Kudos: 81592
Send PM
Re: If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of [#permalink]
Expert Reply
appy001 wrote:
Hi Bunuel,

Why the first statement is wrong...didn't understand.
I. Set S contains only one element.

appy001 wrote:
Nope. Let's go my way...let say if set S={3}....then mean/median = 3 (this does satisfy with question stem "If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of set S")....then this is true.

please correct me if I am missing anything.


Question asks: "which of the following MUST be true about set S" (not COULD be true).

I. Set S contains only one element --> it's not necessarily true as S can contain more than one element and still satisfy the requirement in stem. For example if S={3, 3, 3, 3} then mean of S equals to 3 and it does not exceed the mean of ANY subset of S, which also will be equal to 3.

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2010
Posts: 139
Own Kudos [?]: 215 [0]
Given Kudos: 20
Send PM
Re: If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of [#permalink]
oh well.. :roll:

I read "one element" as one TYPE of element --- that is only the same unique element in what ever number for the whole set which is essentially the same as II...

elements is really a reference to the data points in the set
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 615
Own Kudos [?]: 2930 [0]
Given Kudos: 25
Location: London
 Q51  V41
Send PM
Re: If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of [#permalink]
gmat1011 wrote:
oh well.. :roll:

I read "one element" as one TYPE of element --- that is only the same unique element in what ever number for the whole set which is essentially the same as II...

elements is really a reference to the data points in the set


In set theory there is no requirement for uniqueness of elements, and in general elements does not refer to unique constituents

So {3,3,3} is different from {3}
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 587
Own Kudos [?]: 3156 [0]
Given Kudos: 322
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of [#permalink]
Hi Bunuel,

I am still unable to get the solution.

When we can have an empty set {0} as a subset of each set, in that case we would have a average as 0 and thus consider the below example.

You have a set : {1,1,1}

One possible subset : {0}

Average of the set : 1

Average of subset:0

So still it exceeds the average of subset .

Can you advise on that?

Rgds,
TGC!
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Sep 2013
Posts: 25
Own Kudos [?]: 110 [0]
Given Kudos: 82
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT Date: 10-25-2013
GPA: 3
WE:Operations (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Send PM
Re: If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of set S , which of the following must be true about set S?

I. Set S contains only one element
II. All elements in set S are equal
III. The median of set S equals the mean of set S

A. none of the three qualities is necessary
B. II only
C. III only
D. II and III only
E. I, II, and III

"The mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of set S" --> set S can be:
A. \(S=\{x\}\) - S contains only one element (eg {7});
B. \(S=\{x, x, ...\}\) - S contains more than one element and all elements are equal (eg{7,7,7,7}).

Why is that? Because if set S contains two (or more) different elements, then we can always consider the subset with smallest number and the mean of this subset (mean of subset=smallest number) will be less than mean of entire set (mean of full set>smallest number).

Example: S={3, 5} --> mean of S=4. Pick subset with smallest number s'={3} --> mean of s'=3 --> 3<4.

Now let's consider the statements:

I. Set S contains only one element - not always true, we can have scenario B too (\(S=\{x, x, ...\}\));

II. All elements in set S are equal - true for both A and B scenarios, hence always true;

III. The median of set S equals the mean of set S - - true for both A and B scenarios, hence always true.

So statements II and III are always true.

Answer: D.

Also discussed here: ps-challenge-93565.html




hi bunuel , little confused here ..
Please explain me where am i going wrong.

I took the elements of set S={1,2,3,4)
And the subset elemets as ={2,3,4)

however this does not meet the second situation requirement. i.e. ( all elemets in set s are equal)
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 May 2014
Status:PhD Student
Posts: 34
Own Kudos [?]: 41 [0]
Given Kudos: 19
WE:Account Management (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of [#permalink]
I read all explanation but I still think question should ask " what could be true" instead of what must be true because we can have few sets where mean of set S doesn't exceed the mean of Sub set of S without Same number in whole set

Same Example:
Set S: 5,6,7

Sub set A: 5
Sub set B: 7

for Sub set A set S doesn't exceed mean of its sub set and it is not dependent all similar integers in set. ( condition of question is met )
If we take both your choices correct II, III then we should not be able to find alternate sets consisting Dissimilar numbers and sub set has lower mean than set itself.

Please review your answer again.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92904
Own Kudos [?]: 618875 [0]
Given Kudos: 81592
Send PM
Re: If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of [#permalink]
Expert Reply
awal_786@hotmail.com wrote:
I read all explanation but I still think question should ask " what could be true" instead of what must be true because we can have few sets where mean of set S doesn't exceed the mean of Sub set of S without Same number in whole set

Same Example:
Set S: 5,6,7

Sub set A: 5
Sub set B: 7

for Sub set A set S doesn't exceed mean of its sub set and it is not dependent all similar integers in set. ( condition of question is met )
If we take both your choices correct II, III then we should not be able to find alternate sets consisting Dissimilar numbers and sub set has lower mean than set itself.

Please review your answer again.


S cannot be {5, 6, 7}. The stem says that the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of set S.

The mean of S is 6. One of the subsets of S is {5}, with mean of 5. So, the mean of S, which is 6, is greater than the mean of its subset {5}.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Jun 2014
Posts: 19
Own Kudos [?]: 80 [0]
Given Kudos: 23
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
Send PM
Re: If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of [#permalink]
HI, Bunuel,

I dont understand how we can say that all elements in a set are equal in case of a set S={2} , which has only a single element.
Is this an established rule in Set Theory or is it a personal opinion.

If the set has just one element, then it is not comparable with anything else . So, according to English grammar & logic, it does not make sense to say that all elements are same in that Set.

Kindly tell me if this is an established Practice.. Thank you
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 18756
Own Kudos [?]: 22050 [0]
Given Kudos: 283
Location: United States (CA)
Send PM
Re: If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of [#permalink]
Expert Reply
angel2009 wrote:
If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of set S , which of the following must be true about set S ?

I. Set S contains only one element
II. All elements in set S are equal
III. The median of set S equals the mean of set S


A. none of the three qualities is necessary
B. II only
C. III only
D. II and III only
E. I, II, and III


If the mean of set S does not exceed the mean of any subset of set S, then all the elements in S must be equal. That is because if there is an element that is not equal to the others, then the mean of S will exceed the mean of at least one subset of S. For example, if S = {1, 4, 4}, we see that the mean of S is 3, and the mean of a subset of S, say {1, 4}, is only 2.5.

Thus, we see that Roman numeral II is true. Furthermore, if all the elements in S are equal, then the median of S equals the mean of S, so Roman numeral III is true also.

Answer: D
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Sep 2019
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of [#permalink]
Hi Bunuel and ScottTargetTestPrep

If set S was empty, none of the conditions I, II and III must be true, yet the mean of set S would not exceed the mean of any subset of S. Hence, I chose A. I would highly appreciate if you could explain where my flaw is?

Many thanks!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: If the mean of set S does not exceed mean of any subset of [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
Math Expert
92901 posts
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne