Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 11:12 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 11:12

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2010
Posts: 124
Own Kudos [?]: 3525 [4]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 May 2010
Status:Preparing for GMAT - March 2011
Posts: 89
Own Kudos [?]: 58 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: London
Concentration: finance
Schools:INSEAD, RSM, HEC, St. Gallen, IF, IESE
 Q48  V31
WE 1: Finance 6 years
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92902
Own Kudos [?]: 618785 [2]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Aug 2010
Posts: 65
Own Kudos [?]: 511 [0]
Given Kudos: 27
Location: Bangalore, India
Send PM
Re: If w and c are integers is w > 0 ? (1) w + c > 50 (2) [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
ajit257 wrote:
If w and c are integers is w > 0 ?

(1) w + c > 50
(2) c > 48

I have a doubt the ans.


Obviously each statement alone is not sufficient.

When taken together we can still have both Yes and No answers: if c=100 and w=10 then the answer is Yes but if c=100 and w=-10 then the answer is No.

Answer: E.

I feel that it should be w+c<50 for (1). Then as \(c\) is an integer then the least value of it according to (2) will be 49, so max value of \(w\) in order \(c+w\) to be less than 50 is 0 (as \(w\) is also an integer), which means that the answer to the question is \(w>0\) is No. So if it were \(w + c < 50\) the answer would be C and also the question would be much more interesting.

Hope it's clear.


Bunuel, taking the qtn as you specified i.e. w+c<50 Please clarify why am i getting w < 2
1) \(w+c<50\)
2) \(c > 48\)

now 2) can be written as \(-c < -48\)
as both the inequalities have the same sign, 1) + 2)
==> \(w < 50-48\)
==> \(w< 2\)
why am i not getting \(w <= 0\) for the answer to be C

Regards,
Murali.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92902
Own Kudos [?]: 618785 [2]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: If w and c are integers is w > 0 ? (1) w + c > 50 (2) [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
muralimba wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
ajit257 wrote:
If w and c are integers is w > 0 ?

(1) w + c > 50
(2) c > 48

I have a doubt the ans.


Obviously each statement alone is not sufficient.

When taken together we can still have both Yes and No answers: if c=100 and w=10 then the answer is Yes but if c=100 and w=-10 then the answer is No.

Answer: E.

I feel that it should be w+c<50 for (1). Then as \(c\) is an integer then the least value of it according to (2) will be 49, so max value of \(w\) in order \(c+w\) to be less than 50 is 0 (as \(w\) is also an integer), which means that the answer to the question is \(w>0\) is No. So if it were \(w + c < 50\) the answer would be C and also the question would be much more interesting.

Hope it's clear.


Bunuel, taking the qtn as you specified i.e. w+c<50 Please clarify why am i getting w < 2
1) \(w+c<50\)
2) \(c > 48\)

now 2) can be written as \(-c < -48\)
as both the inequalities have the same sign, 1) + 2)
==> \(w < 50-48\)
==> \(w< 2\)
why am i not getting \(w <= 0\) for the answer to be C

Regards,
Murali.


First of all:
You can only add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction:

If \(a>b\) and \(c>d\) (signs in same direction: \(>\) and \(>\)) --> \(a+c>b+d\).
Example: \(3<4\) and \(2<5\) --> \(3+2<4+5\).

You can only apply subtraction when their signs are in the opposite directions:

If \(a>b\) and \(c<d\) (signs in opposite direction: \(>\) and \(<\)) --> \(a-c>b-d\) (take the sign of the inequality you subtract from).
Example: \(3<4\) and \(5>1\) --> \(3-5<4-1\).

So, you can directly subtract \(c > 48\) from \(w+c<50\): \(w+c-c<50-48\) --> \(w<2\) (no need to rewrite and then add). But this approach won't work for this question: \(w<2\) would be correct if we were not told that both \(w\) and \(c\) are integers then for example c=48.5>48 and w=1>0 would be valid solutions but since both must be integers then \(c\) can be 49, 50, 51 ... and \(w\) can be 0, -1, -2, ... (so c=integer>48 and w=integer<1)

Hope it's clear.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Aug 2010
Posts: 65
Own Kudos [?]: 511 [0]
Given Kudos: 27
Location: Bangalore, India
Send PM
Re: If w and c are integers is w > 0 ? (1) w + c > 50 (2) [#permalink]
oops. Those are integers. Yes this will not apply in case of integers.
I missed it out.

Thanks Bunuel. Kudos for u...

regards,
Murali.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32650
Own Kudos [?]: 821 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: If w and c are integers, is w > 0? (1) w + c > 50 (2) c > 48 [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: If w and c are integers, is w > 0? (1) w + c > 50 (2) c > 48 [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92902 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne