Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

1) is sufficient If x² <1 it means that x is between -1 and 1. So |x| < 1

In statement 2, we can notice that x can not be negative. So for any positive x, |x| = x and then x<1/x means that (x²-1 )/x <0 ==> x²-1 < 0 same as statement 1) sufficient.

D. 1) x^2<1 implies that -1<x<1 which is nothing but |x| < 1. SUFF. 2) If x>0, then the inequality becomes, x < 1/x. Is this possible for integers >= 1 ? No, because for integers >=1 the reciprocal is always smaller than the integer itself.

So we have to think about fractions between 0 and 1. Reciprocal of this fraction will an integer greater than 1. So all the fractions between 0 and 1 will satisfy the equality.

If x<0, then LHS becomes +ve and RHS becomes negative. Is this possible ? No, so anything <0 will not satisfy the inequality.

Hence, we can say for sure that if |x|<1, then |x|<1/x. SUFF.

D. 1) x^2<1 implies that -1<x<1 which is nothing but |x| < 1. SUFF. 2) If x>0, then the inequality becomes, x < 1/x. Is this possible for integers >= 1 ? No, because for integers >=1 the reciprocal is always smaller than the integer itself.

So we have to think about fractions between 0 and 1. Reciprocal of this fraction will an integer greater than 1. So all the fractions between 0 and 1 will satisfy the equality.

If x<0, then LHS becomes +ve and RHS becomes negative. Is this possible ? No, so anything <0 will not satisfy the inequality.

Hence, we can say for sure that if |x|<1, then |x|<1/x. SUFF.

1) is sufficient If x² <1 it means that x is between -1 and 1. So |x| < 1

In statement 2, we can notice that x can not be negative. So for any positive x, |x| = x and then x<1/x means that (x²-1 )/x <0 ==> x²-1 < 0 same as statement 1) sufficient.

hey , I did not get this can you please elobarate ? if x < 0

then the inequation becomes -x < 1/x ==> \(-x^2 < 1\)==> \(x^2 > -1\) how can we rule this out ?

please throw some light on this..

There are two problems in what you have derived:

1. if x<0, then value of |x| is always x. Note that |x| is ALWAYS positive no matter whatever is the value of x. That is why we can say that when x<0, |x| = -x....because -(-x) will be positive x.

2. This is not related to your question because if x<0 your derivation -x < 1/x is wrong(as I explained above)..it should be x < -1/x.

Now, just analyzing your statement, If x<0 and -x < 1/x ==> [m]-x^2 < 1. Here, if -x < 1/x then we can derive -x^2 < 1 only if x > 0. If x<0, then it becomes -x^2 > 1.

Originally posted on MIT Sloan School of Management : We are busy putting the final touches on our application. We plan to have it go live by July 15...